OK. 2257 Requirements..............
 

If a website is not the "producer" within the meaning and intent of the law and merely shows links, iframes, banners, etc procued by others, is any sort of 2257 notice required to appear on that website? Seems to me a clear "NOT!" but I'm interested in your opinions, recommendations and experience. See, you never know what the gov is going to do.

2257 Requirements:

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18...7----000-.html

Thanks in advance.

Sally.

oh shut up.

welcome to two years ago

I would be worried if sarah palin were president

Sally






.

Move to a sensible country.

Thank you for your worthless and irrelevant reply.

GFY.

Sally.

I'm worried as we already have a self-admitted fundamentalist Christian occupying the White House but thank your for your Red Herring irrelevant reply.


GFY.

Sally.

GFY.

Sally.

Yes, perhaps a sensible country like the UJ. You know, the place settled because people on their way South got lost in the Channel fog and wrecked up on the rocks, stranding themselves on that pitiful protrusion in the Atlantic.

You mean the place in which enforcement of Sharia law is permitted, the place in which punitive taxes rule, the health care system is collapsing and the place which maintains a dangerously inbred and corrupt monarchy paid for by the people?

That place?

The place which has virtually outlawed firearms and is now experiencing a nightmarishly severe increase in firearms violence?

The place which has essentially outlawed pocket knives due to "knife crimes"?

Yeah, I soooooooooooooooooooo want to move to a "sensible" country like that!

Thank you for your completely irrelevant reply.

Sally.

I definitely wasn't inviting you to come here.

Thank you for your xenophobic reply.

Otto.

You evidently do not understand the definnition of xenophobia and further, you failed to challenge anything that I wrote as you would find it very difficult to do so, as everything I wrote is verifiable fact.

Just the facts, Ma'am!

Perhaps you have a "more sensible" country in mind?

Sally.

SallyRand, Sabby, JaneB

All psycho-retarded.

asshole :321GFY:321GFY:321GFY

low IQ .that's all about you :disgust:disgust

With your broken English, you're either in a shit hole third world country or you're retarded just like your girlfriend Sally over here. Which one is it?

Area 51's home page, maybe?

http://zapatopi.net/afdb/

Could be.

Sally.

Never mind.

There is no intelligent life responding.

Sally.

The government will find a way to charge you as primary producer if they want to. They can bend the law and interpret it a different way and bring a lousy case knowing that they'll probably lose because they have limitless funds and nothing else to do, and you could win but still go bankrupt in the process. If they want to prove a point, if for some reason their attention is drawn to your little website with dirty pictures on it. The safest thing is either not do it at all, or try to blend in.

Sally, XBiz in feb is going to have a siminar
http://www.xbiz.com/news_piece.php?id=19250

Yeah, I found that in my google search but that was in 2007. There have been minor updates to the law since then.

Thank, though.

Sally.

Very true! There is a lot of proposed legislation out there which is what prompted my question in the first place and am only looking to not give them an excuse as you can't really stay low and earn.

Thanks for your reply.

Sally.

I never paid that shit much attention.

You never know what the gov is going to do so you want all of our opinions, recommendations, and experiences... LOL

Isn't that why people pay attorneys?

oh forget it

Attorneys are not actually trained in the practical aspects of the law but instead are highly trained in courtroom procedure, how to give a case perpetual life through incessant motions and filings, the generation and falsification of billable hours and most know dick about the internet in the first place. So-called internet law, except for 2257 and the CAN-SPAM act, is much more than vague and nebulous, so speaking to a legal beagle about it is tantamount to talking to a wooden post. Aside from that, attorneys are also trained to be deal killers rather than deal doers.

Practical experience in the field will trump a law dregree any day, which is why I seek such practical advice and opinions from those in the trenches.

Sally.

yes my english is broken,in my country english language is not required ,but there is about IQ ,and from what i can see u have a very low one

cool :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

U dun goofed...

http://memegenerator.net/jessi-slaug...e-the-same.jpg

ADG

Clearly you have been speaking to the wrong attorneys.

Very few people on GYF have clue fucking one about 2257. Most of them think they know but they sure as hell don't show or practice following it.

Why would I need to challenge your Daily Mail quality facts?

As for a sensible country, anywhere with no possibly of an internet connection would be a good start.

Except for the last bit a good post.

Sally what will you tel the judge if you stand in front of him? "On GFY they told me it was alright." Will piss him off no end. Go see a lawyer and take his advice. If you can afford one.

If you're working from home and scared to put up the address, go work in a different industry.

You don't worry about your English; you are doing fine and I will tell those who deprecate you

"GFY!"

Sally.

AT LAST!

A sentinet and responsive reply to my original question and thank you so much for your kind reply!

Of course, compliance with that shit is virtually impossible; fucking feds and sexually repressed people, anyway.

The near impossiblity of compliance is of course the point of the legislation.

Thanks again!

Sally.

Being in business requires keeping records and keeping them accurate. Try getting your tax returns wrong and see what the IRS have to say. Same goes for complying to federal, state and zoning business laws. Same goes for insurance.

As pornographers we will always be judged by harsher rules than your local shops. Live by it or go find a new trade.

I've lived with a form of 2257 for decades and it was no problem. Ask me for the documents of an image or video on my sites and I can pull them out in minutes. What I see continually in these threads is an attitude that as the publisher is on the Internet they don't need to adhere to these rules.

http://www.justice.gov/criminal/optf...nce-guide.html

Live by it or go find a new trade.

OK, I think I've got the 2257 thing down but as a marketer essentially doing CPA, just how do I get the 2257 records from the original publisher or do I merely indicate on my sites that the 2257 docs are held by the original creators? That doesn't seem to be quite enough to meet the letter of the law. Will the networks provide these to me? I suppose I could ask them to find out if this is the correct way.

Thanks in advance.

Sally.

This is a question you should be asking your lawyer.

However if you host it and don't have the documents, DON'T PUBLISH IT. Is the safest thing.