Obama .... Will he get a "2nd Term" or is gonna be gone????????
 

:helpme:helpme:helpme:helpme

I think unless he does a royal fuckup in the next year or two he will o go on for a second term..

If not I hope no republicans get in there :helpme

This is probably the dozenth thread here about this, but I would say he likely will get 2nd term much in the same way Bush got a 2nd term - lack of a viable competitor.

i think it depends on the republican nominee again.

Too hard to predict this early. A lot of people didn't think Bush would win a second term and were surprised to see it.

i'll wait until november to make my prediction...



.

You mean like enabling a great depression type economy?

You mean like directly causing unprecedented huge deficits?

You mean like directly causing millions of job losses?

You mean like golfing and partying while millions are suffering?

You mean like waiting months to address a serious environmental disaster?

You mean like lying to the American people after promising transparency, CSPAN for healthcare reform, no lobbyists, etc..

How bad does he have to fuckup, in your opinion?

You have really turned Political Lately. What's up with that?

Aren't these prerequisites for being President?

Na na na na, na na na na, hey hey, goodbye!

The American people where dumb enough to vote for Bush twiceish and vote for Obama once, I can see how they would be dumb enough to vote for Obama again.

probably, if he runs against this guy

I fear who's next. It's gonna take a miracle and the help of Jesus to put things together.

Honestly, I can't wait for the next boob in line to step up and put on the President hat. Don't care if it's GOP, someone from Donkeyville, or even a full-blown bagger nut straight off the turnip truck..... but for the love of jeebuz, make him entertaining. Probably have the best chance of that with a bagger. (although Bush was more than entertaining... he was a gold mine of comedy).

I dont know watching Obama continue to walk into windows at the White House is pretty funny. It would be funnier if the MSM actually made fun of him.

https://www.nydailynews.com/news/pol...mistake_a.html

I think he is busy so he rather put our Country to Sleep calling it "The End"

Wow, your post and way of thinking truly shows what is wrong with this Country. Your brain is so mashed with incorrect information that I'm afraid the reeducation camps aren't going to help you.

I am running for congress soon shhhhhhhhhhhhh :winkwink:

[QUOTE=DaddyHalbucks;17444340]
You mean like enabling a great depression type economy?

You mean like directly causing unprecedented huge deficits?

You mean like directly causing millions of job losses?

You mean like golfing and partying while millions are suffering?

You mean like waiting months to address a serious environmental disaster?

You mean like lying to the American people after promising transparency, CSPAN for healthcare reform, no lobbyists, etc..

How bad does he have to fuckup, in your opinion?

- Bushs fault

- Cleaning up Bushs crap

- Golfing is ok

- Cant blame him for BPs mess

- All politicians lie...

Yep gonna take more than 4 years to clear up the previous administrations fuck ups.

But, let me say this: I do believe Obama has got to start stepping up. If I were him, I'd dump Geithner and Summers like yesterday ....

:2 cents:

there's .04 from me..

He's the first black president, so he can't be made fun of, ever. That seems to be the rules.

I have traveled by car and bike fairly extensively in the past few years and I have to say that I have never seen the amount of obvious displeasure with the current administration ever. And it is all over the country.

One term.

Those same people are very obviously "displeased" when they don't make it to the McDonald's drive-thru in time for morning breakfast cutoff at 10:30.

Every day.

The thread is about Obama, not Bush. :2 cents:

I was humming that when I opened the thread! Haha, See Ya, don't let the door hit cha where your great lord split ya!!!!!:Kissmy

The irony and hypocrisy of this statement shows us why you're either braindead or delusional.

[QUOTE=Juicy D. Links;17444409]Actually, his deficit makes Bush look like a cheapskate in comparison. His grasp of economics is even less than Bush, and I didn't that was possible. He's fucked up this country more than anyone ever imagined. To be "cleaning up Bush's mess", you have to make an iota of progress, not do worse than Bush.

[QUOTE=The Demon;17444729]i have to disagree here and point out that although i think the spending should have been more controlled, this failed economy is the work of several presidents...

i think this administration did what they thought was right or what the big bankers wanted..

unfortunately, no one since little dub knows what the fuck they are doing.

i laugh when i hear comparisons to the great depression.. jesus fucking christ, get your head out of your ass washington.. does anyone there realize that we are a global economy now and that game is entirely different than during the great depression..

there are so many simple factors that drove us to this point.. trade deficits, too loose lending, unregulated banking/wall street, and letting corporations shape policy, to name a few...

i hope obama doesnt get re elected so people can see what the next president will do, which is fuck all..

until people stand up and demand radical changes within govt, we are headed down a darp a long path..

i am just thankful i am still making money in this economy because there is a ton of opportunity right now..

i now realize how people go from being wealthy to mega wealthy in a down economy..

cash is king....




.

You need to recheck your numbers and get a new set of facts to read... it's not even in question that Bush created the deficit we have and Obama himself only added a tiny fraction in comparison. It was Bush that hid the war spending and Obama that corrected it. The rest of your spew is normal crap opinions from you that have no leg to stand on.

Using the Obama administration's own projections, the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates that, including the record 2009 budget deficit of $1.85 trillion, and huge annual deficits over 2009-2019 will result in an additional $11.1 trillion in national debt, on top of the current $11.4 trillion. As I will discuss below, the national debt will very likely more than double in the next decade because some of the CBO's economic assumptions may be too optimistic.

http://www.investorsinsight.com/blog...onal-debt.aspx

Sorry bro, you're arguing with a mentally handicapped child who refuses to abide by facts because they don't suit his viewpoints. I mean look, he just blatantly argued against reality (Obama has added a tiny amount).

i think what most people miss is that somewhere around $15 trillion, the entire taxable input doesnt even cover the interest on the debt....

if the US govt tried to get a home loan, they would get laughed out the door for too high dti ratio.... :1orglaugh

its comical and sad at the same time.... :2 cents:



.

The correction in the war costs being added to the budget and deficit is what added to the 2009 costs and is now what is projected into future budget. He didn't create this error, someone else did. He isn't hiding it, like someone else did. This is what 8 years of lies created for our Country's future.

Bush did 1.3 - 1.4 trillion in bailouts/stimulus, straight up - zero money back. Obama's stimulus was 700 billion to be used over 4 years. As the article states, Obama has only spent $37 billion of the 700 billion bailout. And as we know, some money has come back.

As I stated, Obama himself only added a tiny fraction in comparison.

You should try shutting your mouth for once and actually read up and educate yourself. Here's the article that was posted, read up chump.

http://www.investorsinsight.com/blog...onal-debt.aspx

Here's a quote from the article you think is so spot on. "To-date as of late May, according to the Congressional Budget Office, Obama has only spent $37 billion of the $787 billion stimulus package this year. Are you surprised?"

Of course you are..... it's totally opposite of what the tea baggers tell you, it's not like you've actually read up on what really happens with Obama.

ice ???

http://donaldmeissner.com/blog1/sara...e-magazine.jpg

Thread is over...done.

True, but those are the people that actually show up and vote.


One term, unless something huge happens (which it will) leading up to the election.

there, fixed it for you.... :thumbsup









.

http://www.nataliedee.com/041708/crap-detector.jpg

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_1...76-503544.html
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/ni...towering-debt/

What now? Reject

oh snappppppppppp what did i starttttttttttt

It's election time again already? Didn't you guys JUST get obama?

Obama did not create the 2 trillion in debt, we can see exactly what he spent his stimulus on and how much - and it isn't anywhere close to 2 trillion. You can't find where Obama spent 2 extra trillion dollars, you can't find it in the budget, on the books, war records, any place. Because a big part of it is a correction. And of course Jobs being down makes the debt go up, the automatic stabilizer kicks in. Again, not Obama's doing or fault. Bah....

People like you make American one sad place to live.. uneducated shit stains running all over this Country pretending like they have any type of clue - you make me sick.

It's simple, in the next 2 years the economy turns around then yes, if it doesn't than no... :winkwink:

I think that it really depends on who the Republicans can put up against him. In the current climate the only way one will be able to get the nomination is if they pander to the tea party and by doing that they will be moving to a too extreme point which will not appeal to the overall electorate.

So unless the Republicans can start to move more towards the middle I think they do not have a chance at the White House in 2012

I think you are wrong. McCain was in the middle, Bush was in the middle. We know how that worked out. The more libertarian the republican candidate is the better chance they have.

Isn't Libertarian in the middle? I really don't know, I just assumed it was.