![]() |
Digital Playground Prohit You From Using Keywords!
Just got this from my mailbox. Just thought it was interesting ....
Quote:
|
Several companies don't allow this... nothing new
|
very common in mainstream, rarer in adult.
|
Only a fucking idiot would have a policy like this. But most program owners are idiots.
|
almost all mainstream aff programs (esp big brand names) have a similar policy
|
In adult all this does is ensure you share search results with torrents and tubes with your own content on them INSTEAD of affiliate sites sending you sales.
YES it is listed for adwords, but nobody with a clue about SEO will ever push them. Sure it's brand protection, but it's not protecting shit when you force the hands of google. They have no choice but to fill up the other 9 spots on a page with other sites, and if affiliates can't do it legally, who do you think those other results will be? Great brand protection. |
Quote:
|
is dd1gitalplAygroundd still ok i need clarification.
|
Quote:
|
Digital Playground have some of the best content, but their program is a joke. For years the voice in their movie FHG's were out of sync with the movie - that is IF the FHG was loading to begin with.
The people in charge are/were clueless. I heard they had a new team taking over the affiliate program, but I have heard that one before. |
Did they really give 0 day notice or was this posted earlier? :disgust
Seems fair otherwise. At least they aren't bitching about people ranking high in the organic results. Oh wait. Scratch that. They are bitching about what you use for an url? Fuck them. |
lol what a losers ... another way how to fight with less sales ... not work harder, but fuck with your affiliates ... fuck off digital playground idiots. you have no copyright on typos or so, so i hope everyone who have some typo or seo traffic will point your traffic to other sponsors ... ass will get what ass deserve
|
"we sucks at seo so affiliates are making almost all of our sales, what to do?" "i checked one affiliate, he stole our sales from google, he is on top and he make sales, our sales!" "ok, fuck him, lets ban him and we will get the sales then, woohoo lets rock like in 1998!"
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Personally, I don't see any problem with prohibiting affiliates from bidding on their trademarks and misspellings. As others have said, it's common practice with large mainstream affiliate programs. TeenCat, you should learn the difference between a copyright and a trademark, because your comments sound very ignorant. |
Quote:
|
anyway, its seventh day here with no sun, just rain and under heavy clouds, so i am nervous and aggressive like a shit and is better to do not talk and to get drunk, excuse everyone, i am not happy with myself last few fucking days ... :upsidedow
|
Digital playground actually own the term 'virtual sex' as a trademark.
|
what a bunch of fucking losers, another program on the DO NOT PROMOTE LIST!
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Your 100% correct! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I am sorry your having a bad day but don't take that out on us. We have nothing against Affiliates nor are we trying to screw anyone. In the notice I offered to help anyone that asks and we still allow Affiliates to bid up to position 3. |
I can understand not wanting to bid on your company name, but on pornstar names? Really? I guess they don't want traffic to their model names. Bye bye.
WG |
Quote:
I have been under the radar while things were being fine tuned. I have 12 years of experience in the business and I am slowly getting things back on track. I have worked for Hustler, Playboy, AEBN and Adult Friend Finder. I have a lot to offer any Affiliate that wants to work with us. All my contact info is below hit me up I am always around. Our new Affiliate program and new sites are launching soon so stay tuned this should be a good ride. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Let me be 100% clear here because it seems that a lot of people are having trouble with this. Affiliates CAN bid up to position 3. |
Quote:
you can direct link on efforts that are not paid search related, but this just relates to paid search efforts. |
fuckers, you build up their brand and then they want all juice just for them...
|
@theharvman,
Are u going to get GFY to remove this thread because I post your trademark "Digital Playground" on the title? |
Quote:
Just 2 points of clarification, the Digital Playground "Brand" has been around for 18 Years. Long before an Affiliate Program was even thought of. We have spent Millions of dollars on PR, Advertising, Marketing and Promotions to build what we now have. Sure Affiliate marketing has played a role in our success but by no means the only reason for it. If you read the notice or read the multiple times in the thread that this fact is mentioned Affiliates CAN still bid up to position 3. |
Quote:
Bidding on the keyword dd1gitalplAygroundd or any other misspelling is not allowed. This directly ties to a user who is looking for digitalplayground.com and thereby they should click on our brand paid listing. As outlined bidding on our brand keywords or any misspellings are no longer allowed. you need to decide whether or not you want affiliates buying domains of your misspellings they could impact your seo because they could cause duplicate content or just write better content and out rank you for your own keywords they can also take up more space on some of your keywords which could be a good thing so it's up to you. |
Quote:
|
I wonder where they have been when another idiot program did this a while ago. Not to mention the other program was never successful in taking down the biggest site that they claim to infringe on their trademark. Don't they ever learn? The bad publicity and backlash they get from the very people who support their program is more damaging they trying to protect shitty fuck word that doesn't even spell right.
|
I?m sorry to hear your feelings, we obviously do not want you to leave our program. As I said previously we have increased our search efforts and affiliates just picking up our brand traffic is not cost effective to our business.
Our actual paid search program would be capturing those conversions if it wasn?t for the fact that some affiliates are keeping us from showing at all due to Google?s policies. Trademark restrictions are a common practice in affiliate marketing and while these are in place going forward we are happy to have you continue to drive conversions for us through other measures. |
you have no possitions on first page google, some affiliates have. now, you will lost also the affiliates possitions, and the possitions will be replaced by warez and tube sites ... go, enjoy your business, go but it will be short run ... boooom! :error
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
While I know the idea behind this is to keep your own costs down such that you don't compete with affiliates (hence why you'd allow positions 3-10 to be openly bid on), I think you'll find over time this will encourage webmasters to promote other sites that have your models content licensed (ie: Jesse Jane) on the landing page or members area. Like others have pointed out in this thread, this isn't anything new but take it from someone who's been buying PPC traffic for over 10 years, you'll find out that affiliates would rather take their business elsewhere than have their hands tied. WG |
Trademark restrictions are a common practice for affiliate marketing and not unique to Digital Playground. Affiliates with unique content who are providing a value by driving traffic to there own unique are welcome. We are just not going to have people hijack our Trademarked terms.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
We are not trying to tie anyones hands we are trying to control our brand to the best of our ability. There is nothing preventing Affiliates from promoting any of the other 600+ girls we have on our site. This is simply Trademark issue. |
Quote:
Sorry to break it to you but this is 2010, not adwords year one There is a whole bunch of adwords metrics an affiliate has zero control over, ads with low bids can be displayed sporadically in position 1, go to 5 for a while, back to 2...it is IMPOSSIBLE to bid for position 3. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Can't you see why people are upset? You can protect your TM from abuse, no one is complaining. But using your TM to take profits away from the very own people who support and made you successful all these years is like giving your good friend a stab in the back.
I suggest you guys reconsider. |
Quote:
Then you can safely bid from 4-10 and so on. applying pressure to our program, which raises all of our cost per clicks is not beneficial to anyone |
Quote:
Sara Jay comes to mind just from this week alone. My personal adwords account is almost 7 years old and loyalty has its rewards. Did you go to the DirtyD school for adwords? |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:55 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123