GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   3-D TV Sales Very Flat (article) (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=992512)

GTS Mark 10-14-2010 02:35 PM

3-D TV Sales Very Flat (article)
 
Sales of the much-hyped 3-D televisions have been limp in 2010, a new report says.

Total shipments of the 3-D-capable televisions totalled just 2% of all flat-panel TVs that were shipped to retailers in 2010.

http://technology.canoe.ca/2010/10/14/15690196.html


They should have listened to Kenny Powers, he called it!!!

https://youtube.com/watch?v=Sd43Z_eGIv8

bronco67 10-14-2010 04:09 PM

When they put out a no-glasses TV, then I'll buy one.

GatorB 10-14-2010 04:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bronco67 (Post 17607809)
When they put out a no-glasses TV, then I'll buy one.

basically impossible from a pratical point of view.

GatorB 10-14-2010 04:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GTS Mark (Post 17607468)
3-D TV Sales Very Flat (article)

If you read the report with the glasses it stops looking flat.

Quote:

They should have listened to Kenny Powers, he called it!!!

https://youtube.com/watch?v=Sd43Z_eGIv8
Heck I called it. Common sense really.

RyuLion 10-14-2010 06:37 PM

We got ours 3 months ago..KICKS FUCKING ASS!

TidalWave 10-14-2010 07:05 PM

No point unless they come up with one that doesnt need glasses.

Wheres my holographic tv at?

topsiteking 10-14-2010 07:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RyuLion (Post 17608171)
We got ours 3 months ago..KICKS FUCKING ASS!

As well.
Best thing ever.

jackknoff 10-14-2010 07:27 PM

It's too expensive and too much of a gimmick right now. The glasses gave me a major headache. Sure, the picture looks great, but it simply isn't worth it.


Jack

Zuzana Designs 10-14-2010 07:38 PM

I have a 3d tv and love it. Once the glasses are gone it will make the technology even better.

MaDalton 10-14-2010 07:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB (Post 17607832)
basically impossible from a pratical point of view.

that was also once said about travelling with speeds above 35 kilometers per hour

bronco67 10-14-2010 08:19 PM

Uh oh, look at this....

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-501465_1...13-501465.html

pornmasta 10-14-2010 08:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB (Post 17607832)
basically impossible from a pratical point of view.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencete...V-glasses.html

also there is holograms

pornmasta 10-14-2010 08:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bronco67 (Post 17608395)

i would rep you :p

Socks 10-14-2010 08:30 PM

Upgrading from a huge old crappy TV to a big one for ~$1k was on people's minds.

Upgrading from their nice big LCD TV to a slightly better one with a cool factor, nobody is thinking about.

Sly 10-14-2010 08:33 PM

Like I have said before... watching TV is often a community event. You do it with family and friends. It's not practical to sit around the TV with five friends all wearing glasses. There needs to be some other reason for people to buy. Now if 3-D TVs completely replaced other TVs, that's one thing... but expecting people to buy just for the 3-D experience is not practical at the moment.

bronco67 10-14-2010 09:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sly (Post 17608420)
Like I have said before... watching TV is often a community event. You do it with family and friends. It's not practical to sit around the TV with five friends all wearing glasses. There needs to be some other reason for people to buy. Now if 3-D TVs completely replaced other TVs, that's one thing... but expecting people to buy just for the 3-D experience is not practical at the moment.

Yeah, and it'll get expensive to do that also. You know there will always be one person that won't be able to see Bruce Willis sweat in 3D, because you were too cheap to buy that 6th pair of $200 glasses.

GatorB 10-15-2010 01:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pornmasta (Post 17608397)

I said PRACTICAL. Learn to read. I already know about these crappy TVs.

Toshiba will offer two sizes - 12 inches and 20 inches. The technology is not advanced enough yet to integrate into larger screens. Suggested viewing distance for the 20-inch model is 90 centimetres (35.4 inches) and 65 centimetres (25.6 inches) for the 12-inch size.

These no glasses 3-D TVs require a SPECIFIC viewing distance and you can't be more than 40 degrees off angle. As I said not very practical.

GatorB 10-15-2010 01:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaDalton (Post 17608320)
that was also once said about travelling with speeds above 35 kilometers per hour

Yeah ok in 15 years when they finally figure this shit out and 3-D fad will have faded, how pratcial is that then?

sojproductions 10-15-2010 01:31 AM

3d only works well in the cinema, 3d on a much smaller screen just dont cut it, its a fad that will never quite take off

cordoba 10-15-2010 03:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sojproductions (Post 17608819)
3d only works well in the cinema, 3d on a much smaller screen just dont cut it, its a fad that will never quite take off

You're right, 3D is a fad that will never take off. Anyone who thinks there is money to be made in 3D porn is crazy.

Antonio 10-15-2010 04:05 AM

Glasses aren't the biggest problem - is the availability of the content. Once you get your 3D TV, what are you going to do? Watch Avatar 69 times in a row????

They only started offering enough content in HD yesterday morning, so it would take some time for the 3D to get established, but we are definitely going in that direction ... I would probably wait at least another year or two before I buy a 3D TV as at this point is pretty pointless

SGS 10-15-2010 04:24 AM

Toshiba are the first non-glasses 3D

Stomped 10-15-2010 04:28 AM

I'm looking into buying one just to play games in 3D
That's a killer
I tested Motorstorm in 3D and I was totally sucked in, great shit

CPimp 10-15-2010 04:30 AM

Well, maybe if these ridiculous-priced $2k + TV's would go down in price, people might buy them. I know I will NEVER waste my money on them until they go way down, and they get rid of the fucking $300 glasses.

Not everyone swims in cash like Mallick

:2 cents:

GatorB 10-15-2010 05:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SGS (Post 17609026)

Hey turd this has bene posted 3 times. Also do you wish to sit EXACTLY at a certian distance and at a EXACTLY angle to watch 3-D TV? Who in the fuck watches TV like that?

ShellyCrash 10-15-2010 06:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sly (Post 17608420)
Like I have said before... watching TV is often a community event. You do it with family and friends. It's not practical to sit around the TV with five friends all wearing glasses. There needs to be some other reason for people to buy. Now if 3-D TVs completely replaced other TVs, that's one thing... but expecting people to buy just for the 3-D experience is not practical at the moment.

Quote:

Originally Posted by bronco67 (Post 17608563)
Yeah, and it'll get expensive to do that also. You know there will always be one person that won't be able to see Bruce Willis sweat in 3D, because you were too cheap to buy that 6th pair of $200 glasses.


This was also my issue with it. The sets I have seen only came with 2 pairs, additional pairs were $200 a pop. That's gouging and pretty ridiculous, it's almost as much as a pair of eye glasses. Te fact that you need glasses doesn't bother me as much as the cost. They need to bring the glasses down to what they hand out in the theatres. Cheap plastic frames, cheap plastic lenses, etc. Pick them up for $5 a pop. This way everyone can see and when they get broken it's no big deal.

I only have friends and pets and to me that's impractical, I can't imagine for families with kids (and kids friends coming and going). Right now it seems like way too much money for an occasional thrill. :2 cents:

Emil 10-15-2010 06:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB (Post 17607832)
basically impossible from a pratical point of view.

No, they're already working on it and have made some progress.

Kenny B! 10-15-2010 07:11 AM

Let's see, a 58" 1080p plasma for $1300 or a similar size 3-D and spend $3500 with glasses, that's a steep premium to pay to watch the occasional movie in 3-D. Maybe I'm cheap but I like to think of it as value oriented, I watched a 3D flick and it was cool, but it seems like much more of a novelty.

Rankings 10-15-2010 07:27 AM

If i had more time for T.V. i would have an opinion, but at this point, could care less

bronco67 10-15-2010 07:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kenny B! (Post 17609324)
Let's see, a 58" 1080p plasma for $1300 or a similar size 3-D and spend $3500 with glasses, that's a steep premium to pay to watch the occasional movie in 3-D. Maybe I'm cheap but I like to think of it as value oriented, I watched a 3D flick and it was cool, but it seems like much more of a novelty.

this is the whole problem with the 3D...they're pushing it as the second coming, but it is ultimately just a novelty that doesn't really add that much. I'd rather watch a well written, acted and shot TV show -- I really don't care if its in 3D -- and I'm as techno-geeky as they come.

CIVMatt 10-15-2010 07:55 AM

I like everyone else I know, has no interest in buying a 3D tv

quiet 10-15-2010 07:56 AM

the glasses give me a massive headache, plus you look like a moron wearing them. on top of all that, it's over priced, and doesn't really add all that much to the experience. l'll stick with my new LED 52" until they come up with something better.

Pornopat 10-15-2010 10:42 AM

I just bought the new samsung 3d 9000 series with equipment.
I was down 7000 euro and I am very much looking forward.
I also bought me some movie theather chairs yesterday costing another 6000 euro.
This winter is going to be fun!

96ukssob 10-15-2010 10:44 AM

glass-less technology will be here soon and will be WAY better than having to wear glasses. i cant stand wearing glasses, even sunglasses. Id rather squint my brains out than put on sunglasses

plus, what happens if you have more friends over than you have glasses? "sorry pal, your going to have to just listen to the sound" :1orglaugh

i thought about buying one last year but not worth the $$ IMO

Phoenix 10-15-2010 10:48 AM

what this means to me is, soon i can buy the tv i picked out for myself...at a much lower cost :)

ill wait another 2-3 years to get 3d

i hate buying technology at the highest price, cause after 6 months you feel like an idiot...well i do anyway

bronco67 10-15-2010 11:24 AM

I'm also hoping the 3D effect is subtle, or can at least be dialed to a desired level.

GatorB 10-15-2010 11:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Emil (Post 17609247)
No, they're already working on it and have made some progress.

You lack of reading comprehension is astounding.

Toshiba will offer two sizes - 12 inches and 20 inches. The technology is not advanced enough yet to integrate into larger screens. Suggested viewing distance for the 20-inch model is 90 centimetres (35.4 inches) and 65 centimetres (25.6 inches) for the 12-inch size.

yes sounds like fun. don't forget you can't sit more than 40 degrees off angle either


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:09 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc