GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   No webcam sponsors use Paxum! Why? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=994360)

xiaomaster 10-25-2010 06:37 PM

No webcam sponsors use Paxum! Why?
 
Hi,
I just checked out PussyCash, AWE, Webcams and noticed that they did not use Paxum as payout option :( Most of them use Payoneer which totally sucks. Anyone know why?
Share your view.
Regards.

Tempest 10-25-2010 06:51 PM

Some of them (webcams, streamate) are using EMC2Payouts now.

V_RocKs 10-25-2010 06:52 PM

Because Payoneer apparently gives away blowjobs with each new business account...?

The only thing I can think of is that they pay the sponsor a kickback or something for each payout and webcams possibly pay the girls, the affiliates and the pimps all out and get those kickbacks?

lagcam 10-25-2010 07:05 PM

The difference between Payoneer and a lot of these companies who claim to have been around for years is that people had actually heard of Payoneer before epassporte's demise, and many already had accounts with them.

That is why Payoneer are considered the safer option for many merchants......because adult business is EXTRA income for them rather than ALL of their income.

Barry-xlovecam 10-25-2010 09:39 PM

Any payment agent can become unstable, or worse, fold like ePassporte just did. The problem for us is that we may have large amounts of funds that we have 'loaded' with such a payment agent for the purpose of paying ALL affiliates and that money (our payment monies for your Rev-Share) is at risk, thousands of Dollars or Euros.

So, we seek security. Paxum is a new company ? that in itself is not really a bad thing.

I am investigating Paxum now. From the ATM card point of view, both Paxum and Payoneer are using offshore banks in Belize. So in essence, from the affiliate point of view, the risk is about the same.

However, we do understand our affiliates need to aggregate their affiliate pay-outs (from multiple sponsors) so in light of this ? a payment card solution is currently being sought out with its probable security, its world-wide availability and that withdrawals may be made by an ATM card being the necessary criteria.

One thing that I do like about Paxum are the comments that I have read here by their representatives ? the $2,500 ATM withdrawal limit and their prompting to take your money out. The problem that I have in this is that they believe that they can comfortably exist within their current fee structures.

Maybe, with the volume and some interest that they would receive from their banks ? I'll be blunt, if any money transfer agent would be willing to bond our payout "loads" with a $25,000 bond naming us as the beneficiary of any loss, they would most likely get our business. I would consider helping them to raise the 10% bond fee for a bond from an accredited surety company.

Hermes 10-25-2010 10:48 PM

Not sure about pussycash but at least AWE used Payoneer already before epass went down.

Anyway XXXL Money has cams and Paxum and CashX.

epitome 10-25-2010 10:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam (Post 17640944)
Any payment agent can become unstable, or worse, fold like ePassporte just did. The problem for us is that we may have large amounts of funds that we have 'loaded' with such a payment agent for the purpose of paying ALL affiliates and that money (our payment monies for your Rev-Share) is at risk, thousands of Dollars or Euros.

So, we seek security. Paxum is a new company ? that in itself is not really a bad thing.

I am investigating Paxum now. From the ATM card point of view, both Paxum and Payoneer are using offshore banks in Belize. So in essence, from the affiliate point of view, the risk is about the same.

However, we do understand our affiliates need to aggregate their affiliate pay-outs (from multiple sponsors) so in light of this ? a payment card solution is currently being sought out with its probable security, its world-wide availability and that withdrawals may be made by an ATM card being the necessary criteria.

One thing that I do like about Paxum are the comments that I have read here by their representatives ? the $2,500 ATM withdrawal limit and their prompting to take your money out. The problem that I have in this is that they believe that they can comfortably exist within their current fee structures.

Maybe, with the volume and some interest that they would receive from their banks ? I'll be blunt, if any money transfer agent would be willing to bond our payout "loads" with a $25,000 bond naming us as the beneficiary of any loss, they would most likely get our business. I would consider helping them to raise the 10% bond fee for a bond from an accredited surety company.

Now that is a thoughtful and professional response! So refreshing to see that here on GFY.

The bonding is a great idea. If maid services and moving companies are willing to get bonded, then a money transfer business should as well. :2 cents:

NickB. 10-25-2010 11:18 PM

camspotcash.com

Hermes 10-25-2010 11:29 PM

1 more more cam sponsor that just added Paxum as a payment option:
Payserve

:2 cents:

Phooq 10-26-2010 03:21 AM

Don't forget LoadedCash also have the webcam to videochat member site, Sex Play Cam.

and IA Cash have one as well I believe

seeandsee 10-26-2010 03:23 AM

they will add them, wait a little bit


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:24 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc