The term webmaster is too broad, we need more levels to indicate experience and success
 

1. webmaster, qualified webmasters only, voted by peers, or success in web development...major site owners...new technology developers etc

2. web worker...you work on projects, which end up on the web,

3. troll...no need to explain this one


i think ideally we would have 5 levels to let people know where you stand
its like telling anyone you are a webmaster, when all you do is own a domain and talk shit on gfy or some other forum..lol

its like a guy who took a first aid course saying he is a doctor

we need an association to grade everyone

4. smart asses (they know all, not trolls, programing, creating, manipulating, owning many paysites etc...)

5. contra/opposite (always saying opposite of what you say. you say some girl is hot, he say it's not, you say well is not hot, he say, hmm she is hot at the end :p)

6. pic masters (posting just pics, fail, facepalms, funny pics etc :) )

7. make your own forum with your own rules

Sure, you can give whatever details you want. You know that you can describe someone in 50 words or in 1,000 words. It's just a matter of whether someone has the time to read it or not. You could even give an abbreviation of 3 letters or 4 letters such as Milf.

you're so smart fatfoo :1orglaugh

Best advise.
:2 cents:

congrats to the winners ... :thumbsup