SEO Thread: First 10k inbound links!

[Marshal]

Pages | Inlinks (10,008)

My first 10k inbound links for www.0-dix.com

10k links to 0-dix.

<a title="porn" href="http://www.0-dix.com/">Free Porn</a>

Feel free to submit your sites there! (check out the signature)

[Splum]

"Inlinks (38,272)"

[LiveDose]

Nice man, nice...

[aless]

That's nice, congrats. How's se traffic with this amount of backlinks ?

[cpt. insaino]

You should put up Camazon its converting better then Fling for me

[StarkReality]

That's nice, congrats. How's se traffic with this amount of backlinks ?

Hard to tell in general, you can get big traffic with 1k backlinks and a few hundred hits only with 50k.

But anyway, congrats, Nettrust, great directory

[dynastoned]

You should put up Camazon its converting better then Fling for me

lol your fucked up photoshop stats don't count as conversions.

http://www.gfy.com/showthread.php?t=705881

[tenderobject]

wow i tried one of my domain it has 12k hmmm and another one is 17k.

[xenilk]

Inlinks (12,294) sweet. Cool tool. Congrats

[Marshal]

you are welcome to submit your sites and get some nice niched traffic!

[lucas131]

Inlinks (19,955)

[Klen]

Nice.But still you need to have more outlinks.

[Fizzgig]

wow i tried one of my domain it has 12k hmmm and another one is 17k.

Very nice!

@)}---'------
Fizzgig

[tranza]

Congrats dude...

[Andiz]

Inlinks (47,316)

[DarkJedi]

all those links and your site is still isnt worth shit

nowhere to be found in either Yahoo or Goolge

[rowan]

My first 10k inbound links for www.0-dix.com

First time I clicked on your URL I was redirected to hxxp://85.255.115.220/ind.htm?src=198&surl=www.0-dix.com&sport=80&suri=%2F . what's the deal?

[CaptainWolfy]

congrats man

[Violetta]

Inlinks (10,977) (my blog)

[Quickdraw]

First time I clicked on your URL I was redirected to hxxp://85.255.115.220/ind.htm?src=198&surl=www.0-dix.com&sport=80&suri=%2F . what's the deal?

same here but this url
85.255.115.220/site.htm?lng=1&trg=cln&oip=0

[pornguy]

I dont see a PR. and your alexa is not that great. And can not find you in google or yahoo.

[madawgz]

Inlinks (7,359)

[Marshal]

I dont see a PR. and your alexa is not that great. And can not find you in google or yahoo.

try to type in right url!

this site survived 2 Google PR updates.

[rowan]

try to type in right url!

this site survived 2 Google PR updates.

You gonna answer the question about your redirect? If you've got people linking to you in return for an entry do they know you do this?

[Marshal]

You gonna answer the question about your redirect? If you've got people linking to you in return for an entry do they know you do this?

what kind of redirection??? there's no redirects on my site!

[Quickdraw]

what kind of redirection??? there's no redirects on my site!

Yes there is, or was. I was sent to a different spot than Rowan, but same IP.

Hope you find out what it is.

[Tagir]

I am submit blogs yo you

[Linkster]

Hmmm - Inlinks (49,841) - guess Im doing something right

[rowan]

what kind of redirection??? there's no redirects on my site!

Dude... I run everything through a web cache which logs requests.

Your server returned a 302 redirect.

[themonk]

congrats man

[rowan]

Here's what happened when I loaded your site... 2 redirects. The first came from your server (www.0-dix.com/38.96.6.100)


1171726936.408 1458 203.x.x.x TCP_MISS/302 777 GET http://www.0-dix.com/ - DIRECT/38.96.6.100 text/html

1171726937.038 630 203.x.x.x TCP_MISS/302 278 GET http://85.255.115.220/ind.htm?src=19...0&suri=%2F - DIRECT/85.255.115.220 text/html

1171726937.471 432 203.x.x.x TCP_MISS/200 664 GET http://85.255.115.220/site.htm?lng=1&trg=cln&oip=0 - DIRECT/85.255.115.220 text/html


You'll note that someone else independently reported the redirect and showed the second URL, which I hadn't mentioned.

Just a warning for anyone linking to his site, you can make your own conclusions. If he's innocent, then he needs to get his shit fixed.

[Marshal]

Here's what happened when I loaded your site... 2 redirects. The first came from your server (www.0-dix.com/38.96.6.100)


1171726936.408 1458 203.x.x.x TCP_MISS/302 777 GET http://www.0-dix.com/ - DIRECT/38.96.6.100 text/html

1171726937.038 630 203.x.x.x TCP_MISS/302 278 GET http://85.255.115.220/ind.htm?src=19...rt=80&suri=%2F - DIRECT/85.255.115.220 text/html

1171726937.471 432 203.x.x.x TCP_MISS/200 664 GET http://85.255.115.220/site.htm?lng=1&trg=cln&oip=0 - DIRECT/85.255.115.220 text/html


You'll note that someone else independently reported the redirect and showed the second URL, which I hadn't mentioned.

Just a warning for anyone linking to his site, you can make your own conclusions. If he's innocent, then he needs to get his shit fixed.

please hit me up on icq#:53667259.

i was trying to figure out what was the problem. i had the same problem here. i found out it was a windows trojan overriding DNS connection settings. similar to this one:

http://www3.ca.com/securityadvisor/v....aspx?ID=39921

after i removed it, everything was back to normal.

please contact me, i just want to be sure it's not a problem with my server.

thanks!

[RyuLion]

submitted two sites..

[rowan]

please hit me up on icq#:53667259.

i was trying to figure out what was the problem. i had the same problem here. i found out it was a windows trojan overriding DNS connection settings. similar to this one:

http://www3.ca.com/securityadvisor/v....aspx?ID=39921

after i removed it, everything was back to normal.

please contact me, i just want to be sure it's not a problem with my server.

thanks!

Unless someone has written a virus for FreeBSD that affects Squid logs, the redirect came from your server. I don't see what your Windows workstation has to do with it.

[rowan]

Just to clarify...

Squid (my web cache software) does its own DNS lookups. It decided www.0-dix.com lives at the IP 38.96.6.100 (which I presume is correct), connected to port 80, requested "/" and got back a 302 redirect.

The server that runs my web cache uses unix, the server that runs your web site also appears to use unix, so there's no windoze involved

[Linkster]

That IP is correct:
Search Results for 38.96.6.100 [no reverse DNS set]
1 Results for 38.96.6.100

Website
1. 0-dix.com

[dissipate]

It's not that hard to build massive massive backlinks if you know a few good tricks =)

[OzMan]

please hit me up on icq#:53667259.

i was trying to figure out what was the problem. i had the same problem here. i found out it was a windows trojan overriding DNS connection settings. similar to this one:

http://www3.ca.com/securityadvisor/v....aspx?ID=39921

after i removed it, everything was back to normal.

please contact me, i just want to be sure it's not a problem with my server.

thanks!

I would have used the "uh I think my friend did it" excuse instead
...more believable

[Turboface]

nettrust, for some reason your site does not load in for me when I go to it. When I try a second time, I get there.

It's not my cache, ISP, or anything else on my end. Have you had anyone else tell you about this?

[V_RocKs]

Pages (480) | Inlinks (9,528)

[Marshal]

nettrust, for some reason your site does not load in for me when I go to it. When I try a second time, I get there.

It's not my cache, ISP, or anything else on my end. Have you had anyone else tell you about this?

thanks for the notice. i didn't have problems like this...

btw, i didn't have those 302 problems, nor anyone else except rowan. to be honest i have no idea what could be the problem. just to be sure i recompiled apache, php and all the modules.

[Marshal]

Here's what happened when I loaded your site... 2 redirects. The first came from your server (www.0-dix.com/38.96.6.100)


1171726936.408 1458 203.x.x.x TCP_MISS/302 777 GET http://www.0-dix.com/ - DIRECT/38.96.6.100 text/html

1171726937.038 630 203.x.x.x TCP_MISS/302 278 GET http://85.255.115.220/ind.htm?src=19...rt=80&suri=%2F - DIRECT/85.255.115.220 text/html

1171726937.471 432 203.x.x.x TCP_MISS/200 664 GET http://85.255.115.220/site.htm?lng=1&trg=cln&oip=0 - DIRECT/85.255.115.220 text/html


You'll note that someone else independently reported the redirect and showed the second URL, which I hadn't mentioned.

Just a warning for anyone linking to his site, you can make your own conclusions. If he's innocent, then he needs to get his shit fixed.

looks like the problem is not on my side. check out this page:
http://gabrielharrison.co.uk/consult...search_hijack/

[rowan]

looks like the problem is not on my side. check out this page:
http://gabrielharrison.co.uk/consult...search_hijack/

Read my message carefully again: it clearly shows the IP that my web cache connected to. It is the web cache, not the browser, that does the DNS lookup... and that is unix based, nothing to do with Windows.

Read it again, 0-dix.com = 38.96.6.100, that's right ? That is the IP is connected to, and that is what returned the redirect.

I dunno why you bothered bumping this...

[Martin3]

Majority of your links are all internal. Check the external links and the number is closer to 3,000 and of those 3000 the majority are all on the same sites.

Any script kiddie with a few domains could accomplish the same thing.

[INever]

It's not that hard to build massive massive backlinks if you know a few good tricks =)

Are you drunk enough to explain how?

[Vick!]

Actual number of links

http://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt=...Awww.0-dix.com


Links from your own site doesn't count when it comes to link popularity.

[Linkster]

Actual number of links

Links from your own site doesn't count when it comes to link popularity.

Neither do the links coming from his other sites that have the same whois included in that list

[abshard]

i have 50,000 on one site and 96,000 on another

[Vick!]

Neither do the links coming from his other sites that have the same whois included in that list

[Jamie]

88,254 .... shrug