Fox News: Lies Lies Lies
Collapse
X
-
ok it isn't rick roll -
-
They dont promote a left wing agenda,thats a myth created by fox. If the media was so left wing it wouldnt of been the national enquirer outting him as a drug addict.
http://www.whatliberalmedia.com/apndx_3.htmComment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
The Washington Post almost single handedly brought down Richard Nixon, a democratic president. Try to get your facts straight.Comment
-
didn't even look at the vid ... It is true that the talk show ( that is what those shows are ) host interrupts the guest to give his opinion that he labels as facts ... Even the substitutes do the same .... It is, aside from impolite, not very balanced ....I know that Asspimple is stoopid ... As he says, it is a FACT !
But I can't figure out how he can breathe or type , at the same time ....Comment
-
When Fox News and ABC News reported on Obama and Rev. Wright, i began searching for confirmations from CNN, the NY Times, AP, Reuters...etc. Not a single article.
Later, when Obama made his race speech, it was all over the news, all of them praising Obama, while in the meantime his popularity was declining rapidly according to polls.
Obama = Left wing cult of personality.
Fox News, Bush and Wal-Mart = Left wing obsessions.
Last edited by xmas13; 03-26-2008, 02:53 PM.ICQ 557504926Comment
-
Comment
-
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...on&btnG=Search
NY Daily News, Huffington Post, US News, ABC News.
What a cover-up.
ICQ 557504926Comment
-
-
"As pornographers we must act responsibly! ;))"- Nickatilynx
I might be Old and Tired, but at least I don't support a whiney cuntComment
-
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Nixon
Navy lieutenant commander in the Pacific.
Political party: Republican.ICQ 557504926Comment
-
does it hurt to be so ignorant? CNN et al are what until very recently was considered center right until Fox moved the goalposts. They are actual news organizations. Fox is a propaganda dissemination center. This is all waaaaaaay over your head.http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...on&btnG=Search
NY Daily News, Huffington Post, US News, ABC News.
What a cover-up.
Comment
-
-
Comment
-
-
Because Dieboldt is a tool for corrupt republicans, that's why, and also in large part because of people like you who believe there's a liberal media (among many other deeply, deeply retarded ideas) because that's what you're told to believe.
Note: This was written before September 11th, so don't
write to explain that Barbara Olson is dead, OK?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Myth of the "liberal" media
Let's do a "what if" so I can make a point. I think it's a good one.
I think it's so good, I'd like to hear from anyone who disagrees.
What if a show like Dateline did a "hatchet job" on George W. Bush?
It wouldn't have to really be a hatchet job, but any honest appraisal of that idiot's
qualifications would prove he's a non-thinking rich man's boy - and that's all.
But what would happen if Dateline did an unflattering portrait of Bush?
I'll tell you what would happen:
The vulgar Pigboy would spend at least three hours saying it wasn't true
and he'd offer hours of rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.
Bill O'Reilly would spend at least an hour on his show saying
it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.
Sean Hannity would walk all over Alan Colmes for an hour that night,
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.
Eva Von Zahn would spend at least an hour that night saying it wasn't true
and she'd offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.
The Beltway Boys would spend at least an hour that night saying it
wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.
Brit Hume and Tony Snow would spend at least an hour on Sunday
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.
Juan Williams and Mara Liason would spend their entire allotted time
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.
John McLaughlin would spend at least an hour on his syndicated show
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.
Chris the Screamer would spend at least an hour on his show
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.
G. Gordon Liddy would spend at least three hours on his radio show
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.
Laura the Whore would spend at least an hour on her radio show
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.
Michael Medved would spend at least an hour on his radio show
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.
Sam and Cokie would spend at least an hour on This Whore
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.
George (Judas Maximus) Steffi and George (dumb as a chimp) Will
would spend their entire allotted time swearing that it wasn't true.
Bob Scheiffer would spend at least an hour on Face the Whore
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.
Tim the Catholic would spend at least an hour on Meet the Whore
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.
John Hockenberry would spend at least an hour on his show
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.
Ollie North would spend at least an hour on his radio show
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.
Robert Novak would spend at least an hour on his cable TV show
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.
Paul Weyrich would spend at least an hour on his cable TV show
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.
Still with me? We're close to the end...
BSNBC's Brian Williams would spend at least an hour on his show
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.
Wolf the Whore would spend at least an hour on his show saying
it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.
Bill Schneider and Candy Crowley would do an hour special on CCN
(Clinton Cock Network) saying it wasn't true, and offering rebuttal.
John Stossel would have a special on ABC: Is lying OK for liberals?
Then Howie Kurtz would spend 30 minutes on Reliable Sources asking
if the media wasn't being too hard on a developmently-disabled child.
Barbara Olson would write a book condemning Dateline.
Ann Coulter would write a book condemning Dateline.
Laura Ingraham would write a book condemning Dateline.
Peggy Noonan would write a book condemning Dateline.
Andrew Sullivan would write a book condemning Dateline.
William Safire would write a book condemning Dateline.
OK, we're going to call the above "Exhibit A."
Now, everyone on that list has done at least a dozen hit pieces on Clinton.
My question is, Where is "Exhibit B?"
When those 38 people attack Clinton and his cock, who does the rebuttal?
Even you ditto-sheep have to admit that nobody on that list
has EVER defended a fabricated lie against the president.
There is no "Exhibit B," because there are so few liberal voices on television.
The closest you can get is Eleanor on McLaughlin or Geraldo, but there is barely
a liberal whisper on television, even though there are DOZENS of right-wing,
Smirk-apologist shows whose livelyhood is lying about liberals.
I don't think you ditto-heads can offer an answer.
Prove me wrong.
http://www.bartcop.com/libmedia.htm
------------
if anything, the situation has gotten MUCH more biased since this was written.Comment
-
Tell me why 2/3 of non-African American voters re-elected Bush in 2004?
Don't you fucking understand?
You only win elections by bribing African Americans with nice words and welfare checks. Without their 90%+ bloc vote, the Democratic Party would not even have a single chance to win an election in America.
Someone said, a guy without information is more likely to provide a fair judgement than one with plenty of false information.Last edited by xmas13; 03-26-2008, 03:40 PM.ICQ 557504926Comment
-
Comment
-
....................The latest polls reflecting Obama’s near-collapse should serve as a morality tale of John Edwards’s two Americas — the political obtuseness of the intellectual elite juxtaposed to the common sense of the working classes.
For some bizarre reason, Obama aimed his speech at winning praise from National Public Radio, the New York Times, and Harvard, and solidifying an already 90-percent solid African-American base — while apparently insulting the intelligence of everyone else.Last edited by xmas13; 03-26-2008, 03:47 PM.ICQ 557504926Comment
-
Leftist and Islamist keyboard warriors working together. They openly call for the assassination of government officials, advocate civil war, revolt, and the ban of every word, cartoon, expression, thought or idea they don't like.
Last edited by xmas13; 03-26-2008, 04:03 PM.ICQ 557504926Comment
-
this is part of a much longer fox news doc that was on google video a while back, i can't remember what the fuck it was called though. very informative though. faux news is a joke and a half....Comment
-
They will ignore this. lolBecause Dieboldt is a tool for corrupt republicans, that's why, and also in large part because of people like you who believe there's a liberal media (among many other deeply, deeply retarded ideas) because that's what you're told to believe.
Note: This was written before September 11th, so don't
write to explain that Barbara Olson is dead, OK?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Myth of the "liberal" media
Let's do a "what if" so I can make a point. I think it's a good one.
I think it's so good, I'd like to hear from anyone who disagrees.
What if a show like Dateline did a "hatchet job" on George W. Bush?
It wouldn't have to really be a hatchet job, but any honest appraisal of that idiot's
qualifications would prove he's a non-thinking rich man's boy - and that's all.
But what would happen if Dateline did an unflattering portrait of Bush?
I'll tell you what would happen:
The vulgar Pigboy would spend at least three hours saying it wasn't true
and he'd offer hours of rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.
Bill O'Reilly would spend at least an hour on his show saying
it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.
Sean Hannity would walk all over Alan Colmes for an hour that night,
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.
Eva Von Zahn would spend at least an hour that night saying it wasn't true
and she'd offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.
The Beltway Boys would spend at least an hour that night saying it
wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.
Brit Hume and Tony Snow would spend at least an hour on Sunday
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.
Juan Williams and Mara Liason would spend their entire allotted time
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.
John McLaughlin would spend at least an hour on his syndicated show
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.
Chris the Screamer would spend at least an hour on his show
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.
G. Gordon Liddy would spend at least three hours on his radio show
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.
Laura the Whore would spend at least an hour on her radio show
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.
Michael Medved would spend at least an hour on his radio show
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.
Sam and Cokie would spend at least an hour on This Whore
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.
George (Judas Maximus) Steffi and George (dumb as a chimp) Will
would spend their entire allotted time swearing that it wasn't true.
Bob Scheiffer would spend at least an hour on Face the Whore
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.
Tim the Catholic would spend at least an hour on Meet the Whore
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.
John Hockenberry would spend at least an hour on his show
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.
Ollie North would spend at least an hour on his radio show
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.
Robert Novak would spend at least an hour on his cable TV show
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.
Paul Weyrich would spend at least an hour on his cable TV show
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.
Still with me? We're close to the end...
BSNBC's Brian Williams would spend at least an hour on his show
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.
Wolf the Whore would spend at least an hour on his show saying
it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.
Bill Schneider and Candy Crowley would do an hour special on CCN
(Clinton Cock Network) saying it wasn't true, and offering rebuttal.
John Stossel would have a special on ABC: Is lying OK for liberals?
Then Howie Kurtz would spend 30 minutes on Reliable Sources asking
if the media wasn't being too hard on a developmently-disabled child.
Barbara Olson would write a book condemning Dateline.
Ann Coulter would write a book condemning Dateline.
Laura Ingraham would write a book condemning Dateline.
Peggy Noonan would write a book condemning Dateline.
Andrew Sullivan would write a book condemning Dateline.
William Safire would write a book condemning Dateline.
OK, we're going to call the above "Exhibit A."
Now, everyone on that list has done at least a dozen hit pieces on Clinton.
My question is, Where is "Exhibit B?"
When those 38 people attack Clinton and his cock, who does the rebuttal?
Even you ditto-sheep have to admit that nobody on that list
has EVER defended a fabricated lie against the president.
There is no "Exhibit B," because there are so few liberal voices on television.
The closest you can get is Eleanor on McLaughlin or Geraldo, but there is barely
a liberal whisper on television, even though there are DOZENS of right-wing,
Smirk-apologist shows whose livelyhood is lying about liberals.
I don't think you ditto-heads can offer an answer.
Prove me wrong.
http://www.bartcop.com/libmedia.htm
------------
if anything, the situation has gotten MUCH more biased since this was written.Comment
-
K... so, 30 replies later without an answer to this, I'm guessing it's the later.-D.
ICQ: 202-96-31Comment
-
Democrats killed Republicans in the last major election.
Actually, red states have higher crime rates than blue states. They also have higher poverty rates and put more of a deficit on the federal government than blue states (meaning they take in more tax dollars than they put in). Your wealthiest states are blue, your poorest are red.
Again xmas13, have you ever thought of picking up a book? This is almost as bad as your "democracy" "free market" rant the other day.Comment
-
It's my problem because the of ignorant masses that believe the bullshit coming from it then voting, DOES affect my life. shut the fuck up already you retard. How can you be pro neo-republican and be in this business. That's like being a jew and being pro-Hitler. I say neo-republican because the republican party isn't even really the republican party anymore. Just in name only. Ron Paul ironically enough was he only TRUE republican running for the nomination.Comment
-
You want one party rule. Others that share/shared this idea
Hitler
Stalin
Saddam
Mao Tse Tung
Kim Jong Il
Castro
Quite some company you keep.Comment
-
I think that's true by old standards, but the now the Republican party is much more toward the center than they were. They are no longer pushing State's rights and no longer are about smaller government and less spending.
Democrats are not much like old school Democrats either. Decades ago, it was Democrats who pushed for war while Republicans wanted isolation. They have also moved much farther to the center on economic issues than they previously were.
I guess I'm saying that the two parties don't really differ much. They throw their "loyal constituents" a bone on some fringe social issues that don't matter and play the game the same way. Democrats were elected in 2006 when people wanted change. They didn't get that. It's a one party system more or less.Comment





already made it clear above.
Comment