Webcams.com is stealing your PageRank and traffic

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • thehand
    235 Pound Gorilla
    • Apr 2003
    • 3470

    #151
    Originally posted by Quagmire
    If you re-read my post it covers your first question.

    If VS had any business ethics they would have kicked the 'studio' in Toronto to the curb. There is absolutely no possible way to excuse the actions of that 'studio' from a professional standpoint. He took advantage of a situation that he had purely because of representing them. Had he not been representing them he would never have had her personal information.

    Of course the clueless jerkoffs at VS don't seem to be able to grasp this concept.
    Unfortunately the "ignore list" doesn't work when you are quoted but now that I see it - Strait from the models mouth one post before you:

    Originally posted by miss_bellabellini
    That's right Aaliyah, I've mentioned this a few times already but since it is being brought up again I have to say that it was resolved 100% to my satisfaction.

    VS responded to me immediately when I spoke with them directly and sorted out the situation much faster than I anticipated. There will be problems in ANY company, what matters is how the company responds and solves the problems.
    Theers no more money in porn - I got the last of it.

    Comment

    • Quagmire
      Confirmed User
      • Jul 2005
      • 6490

      #152
      Originally posted by thehand
      Unfortunately the "ignore list" doesn't work when you are quoted but now that I see it - Strait from the models mouth one post before you:
      You truly are a dumbass, aren't you? At first I thought it was arrogance, but it actually is stupidity.

      The issue is ethics, not the model you fucking retard.

      Someone do me a favor and quote this so the retard can see it, since he has me on ignore. Pooooor baby.

      Comment

      • DarkJedi
        No Refunds Issued.
        • Feb 2001
        • 28301

        #153
        Originally posted by Quagmire
        You truly are a dumbass, aren't you? At first I thought it was arrogance, but it actually is stupidity.

        The issue is ethics, not the model you fucking retard.

        Someone do me a favor and quote this so the retard can see it, since he has me on ignore. Pooooor baby.

        Comment

        • Doctor Feelgood
          Confirmed User
          • Nov 2005
          • 2112

          #154
          Originally posted by SmokeyTheBear
          lol best "i didnt read the thread at all " response

          p.s. the link isn't in the iframe
          oh, my bad. i only glanced at the code dj posted. thats a wierd place to add a link. it dont show up in firefox or ie7. sounds malicious to me

          Comment

          • Doctor Feelgood
            Confirmed User
            • Nov 2005
            • 2112

            #155
            Originally posted by Jdoughs
            Can't or doesn't? May want to be more specific and factual if you are going to call someone stupid.
            well i wasnt talking to you. so butt out. i was talking to the thread starter, that dj guy. but that was resolved cause i didnt actually read the code correctly he posted. hell, that other guy was right, all i read was the title of the thread and posted that reply. but what do i know, im a dumbass

            Comment

            • collegeboobies
              So Fucking Banned
              • Jul 2004
              • 3644

              #156
              Originally posted by pr0
              I've posted my stats.....& they are verified. 2 diff programs now....

              Lets see one of your sponsor payments.

              Something tells me you live off the $1000 a month your sig makes ya

              Lets see how much longer that sig $ sticks around

              Peace
              I know for a fact one sponsor has given you false stats to post here.

              Comment

              • Azoy?
                Confirmed User
                • Aug 2005
                • 2178

                #157
                Originally posted by Davey Jones
                Don't really matter if I run any sites or not.

                What matters is that pr0 is wrong about there being no PR leakage.

                That iframe makes you link to 2 pages: first link is model page that tracks your sales and second link is webcams.com index page that doesn't track your sales. Google counts the outgoing links to these pages as separate links, thus PR leak.

                Also, webcams.com know what they are doing, because they even set up a title tag for that link, to maximize SEO effect.

                Actually he's not wrong. There is nothing on the Google page rank page that says anything about outgoing links just links coming to your site so forget other sites that may rumor what Google is doing. Focus on the information you getting from the source.

                Comment

                • lazycash
                  Troll Patrol
                  • Aug 2002
                  • 15214

                  #158
                  Originally posted by collegeboobies
                  I know for a fact one sponsor has given you false stats to post here.
                  Hmmm, interesting, care to elaborate?
                  "WTF, on google you can find the answer to every question in human history, EXCEPT how to convert cams..

                  Its crazy..."

                  VenusBlogger

                  Comment

                  • DarkJedi
                    No Refunds Issued.
                    • Feb 2001
                    • 28301

                    #159
                    Originally posted by collegeboobies
                    I know for a fact one sponsor has given you false stats to post here.

                    Comment

                    • AaliyahLove
                      Confirmed User
                      • Apr 2008
                      • 2722

                      #160
                      Originally posted by Quagmire
                      You truly are a dumbass, aren't you? At first I thought it was arrogance, but it actually is stupidity.

                      The issue is ethics, not the model you fucking retard.

                      Someone do me a favor and quote this so the retard can see it, since he has me on ignore. Pooooor baby.
                      Ok well then this sounds like a personal vendetta against Vs between YOU and THEM, this has nothing to do with the model which you make it seem like you are speaking for here..


                      www.AaliyahLove.CamModels.Com

                      Comment

                      • Robocrop
                        Confirmed User
                        • Aug 2008
                        • 2785

                        #161
                        Originally posted by collegeboobies
                        I know for a fact one sponsor has given you false stats to post here.

                        Comment

                        Working...