Look there is the problem, and why DMCA is not vallid in his case. DMCA is good for online content because we as producer can verify if people us our content. But now he sales it in a closed system as being a HD or closed ftp account. I have no way a possibility to verify what he sales and that si exact also why this is by law just stealing, and is DMCA not at order here.
Okay so you have no proof he is selling content that you hold the copyright to. You have no standing to be enforcing someone else's copyright. That pretty much means you're done here in this thread because there's nothing else for you to say.
Again you keep your sales with a site, still no response om the HD issue why would that be? maybe because yoi know that you are wrong there?
DMCA and say it again DMCA is not the subject here. I can't DMCA your HD
Originally posted by Barefootsies
Nice try chief.
You said you could DMCA all this industry's celebrity sites, but you do not do that either. Nor are you in all their monthly promo threads going after them, claiming your content is being stolen, or used without permisson, etc.. Same for blogs and sites sold over in the B&S section.
So once again, it is not the actual copyright or DMCA that is the issue. That makes it personal.
Okay so you have no proof he is selling content that you hold the copyright to. You have no standing to be enforcing someone else's copyright. That pretty much means you're done here in this thread because there's nothing else for you to say.
And that is the whole issue. and because of his description of his content I can only assume that there is a big change he sales also ours. What he doesn't suppose to do anyway, he keep his situation comparing with DMCA but its not. It's right out steeling. DMCA didn't excluded this situation for nothing.
Originally posted by WarChild
Don't get too far ahead of yourself though, because it's still scummy you selling stolen content.
Lol you must get stupid without shoes on. You HD is full with stolen content, as said by yourself. Only you think DMCA is protecting you, and it doesn't. Nothing wrong on this side a lot wrong on your side. You are just a thief.
Originally posted by Barefootsies
Already pointed out repeatedly.
As well reply 102 covers it.
You can't get out of the starting blocks to begin with..
I don't know whats worse the holier than thou motherfuckers or the "your opinion on this doesn't count because you committed a crime once 5 years ago" shit.
This is an industry built on exploitation, there is NO room for your morality shit.
And that is the whole issue. and because of his description of his content I can only assume that there is a big change he sales also ours. What he doesn't suppose to do anyway, he keep his situation comparing with DMCA but its not. It's right out steeling. DMCA didn't excluded this situation for nothing.
Nope.
You are bouncing back and forth and picking and choosing what you want to make dedicated threads about. If you are against the theft of your content, and all programs sites have your content (those are your words) and you could DMCA (DMCA is copyright, meaning you have to PROVE OWNERSHIP. That goes for theft, or claims. try and stick to one point please) them if you wanted, then you show that you are uniform in your complaint.
Otherwise it's personal.
Regardless, you are making claims, and providing no proof of claims. You have no idea of what I do and do not have. But that did not stop you from making this thread. So back peddle all you like.
I don't know whats worse the holier than thou motherfuckers or the "your opinion on this doesn't count because you committed a crime once 5 years ago" shit.
This is an industry built on exploitation, there is NO room for your morality shit.
Do you know what, call in the judges I go to bed when I am not banned tomorrow I suppose i have a good issue here and please while i am busy to eat some pussy provide me the quote where i did say that all programs have our content. Because they don't.
Originally posted by Barefootsies
Nope.
You are bouncing back and forth and picking and choosing what you want to make dedicated threads about. If you are against the theft of your content, and all programs sites have your content (those are your words) and you could DMCA (DMCA is copyright, meaning you have to PROVE OWNERSHIP. That goes for theft, or claims. try and stick to one point please) them if you wanted, then you show that you are uniform in your complaint.
Otherwise it's personal.
Regardless, you are making claims, and providing no proof of claims. You have no idea of what I do and do not have. But that did not stop you from making this thread. So back peddle all you like.
Do you know what, call in the judges I go to bed when I am not banned tomorrow I suppose i have a good issue here and please while i am busy to eat some pussy provide me the quote where i did say that all programs have our content. Because they don't.
You wanted attention. You got it. Too bad it backfired on your ASSumption.
Here's a little tip for next time toots... until you can actually PROVE something, I'd hold off making threads about it. Um, k?
What backfired lol? Did you read at all anything else then those 2 ass kissers? Lol I think it's clear who you are, and most people will associate you with a thief.
Originally posted by Barefootsies
Keep back peddling.
You wanted attention. You got it. Too bad it backfired on your ASSumption.
Here's a little tip for next time toots... until you can actually PROVE something, I'd hold off making threads about it. Um, k?
What backfired lol? Did you read at all anything else then those 2 ass kissers? Lol I think it's clear who you are, and most people will associate you with a thief.
ass kissers?
Sorry but the rules clearly state. if you are going to make a claim that someone is steeling and/or is a scammer without posting proof, you will be banned.
In my eyes thats what you've done.
If you "own" celebrity content. why don't you point Barefootsie in the direction of where your content is and kindly ask him to remove it.
Thats all you have to do.
Starting a thread making claims whether they be false or not. and not posting proof is not what you should be doing.
Sorry but the rules clearly state. if you are going to make a claim that someone is steeling and/or is a scammer without posting proof, you will be banned.
Besides Barefootsies being a total Fucktard, what idiot would pay $1000 for stolen content they could simply steal themselves? After all this, has anyone bought your stupid stolen content?
After all this, has anyone bought your stupid content?
Yep.
I get attacked all the time on here whether for my content, this celebrity stuff, a content deal, my opinion, or by some troll who does not like me, or whatever.
If you honestly think these threads, and bumping them with the name calling hurts me. You'd be mistaken. In the end, people make business decisions. If this board has not taught you that by now, then I'm sorry.
Besides Barefootsies being a total Fucktard, what idiot would pay $1000 for stolen content they could simply steal themselves? After all this, has anyone bought your stupid stolen content?
I'm pretty sure people will more likely purchase barefootsies content than the shit you are peddling in your sig.
I'm pretty sure people will more likely purchase barefootsies content.
They do. The ratios speak for themselves.
Plus I do not just sell people content and tell them good luck and wave them off. I teach them on how to sell it, recoup their investment, and do future business.
Some need help, and some do not. But I am there to help them capitalize and maximize foot content all the same. Whether helping them link build, or teaching them about clip stores, production, or helping with traffic.
Isn't all the discussion taking place in this thread the exact reason DarkJedi was banned? What's the difference between him doing it, and the rest of you?
Free Premium Domain Lists and Tools at Clickmojo.com
Totally different issue, this one goes about that fact that Barefootsies is selling a celeb package where he clearly doesn't have any rights to. He keeps being stupid to protect him self with the DMCA while what he is doing has nothing to do with it. It's simply enough just stealing and the fact i am not banned probably means I have a point here.
Simple problem is, that if we allow this here, soon can sale also twisty, met-art and playboy content as a tangible good.
Originally posted by Brujah
Isn't all the discussion taking place in this thread the exact reason DarkJedi was banned? What's the difference between him doing it, and the rest of you?
the fact i am not banned probably means I have a point here.
No. It means I have not contacted Eric yet.
I figured I would let you come back from your nap, and see if you planned to keep this going another day. I see you are. So I would not get so cheeky friend about not being banned. However, you feel free to keep going with this. Make sure you throw in some more name calling, and allegations with remarks you can't prove. Each new post is just more rope.
In the meantime, thanks for all the bumps. It just drives me more business.
Please contact Eric. By the way , i know he already has been here.
Originally posted by Barefootsies
No. It means I have not contacted Eric yet.
I figured I would let you come back from your nap, and see if you planned to keep this going another day. I see you are. So I would not get so cheeky friend about not being banned. However, you feel free to keep going with this. Make sure you throw in some more name calling, and allegations with remarks you can't prove. Each new post is just more rope.
In the meantime, thanks for all the bumps. It just drives me more business.
So unless you are universal in your bitching of theft on tubes, celebrity sites, all programs with them, ad networks benefiting from them, then you have no merit.
they review the nude scenes and celebrity news. MrSkin a huge celebrity site is working with Playboy. \you think they would be doing this if it was illegal?
what you do is totally different. steal the content and then SELL it to everyone (and you hav no rights for it)
Barefooties is using the message board tactic of over replying in the thread with his own agenda. When used properly it should wear out any nay sayers. If there's nothing wrong with selling stolen content, and buying it to make a site then everyone should be all over this. The celeb guys are always crowing how much money is to being made in the niche.
I'm sure they'll appreciate the market being flooded
Comment