![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
One you realize how it works you can do separate queries to get the results you want. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I sometimes wonder how some of ya'll manage to make enough to pay your mortgage. I swear. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Show possible clients the demo optimized for SEO, speed, etc, and sales will skyrocket. |
Quote:
Let us know when you release a superior script with 90+ CWV out of the box. :winkwink: |
Quote:
https://iili.io/HGDtpRt.md.jpg https://iili.io/HGDtyOX.md.jpg https://iili.io/HGDtmJI.md.jpg Where your results after some "work"? |
Quote:
I don't know if you know this or not, but that last picture - the "SEO checker" you're using, is useless. I'm not really sure why you use it or think it matters, but I think we've went back and forth before after I pointed out you're brain dead about SEO. PM me the domain and we'll see if these screenshots matter at all. :) Because I've got about 30 99/100 sites and they make up about 1% of the total SE traffic across my network. One signal an SEO strategy does not make. :winkwink: |
I did hit up Konrad with a couple ideas to make "default" CWV a bit better when he ships to customers, though, after digging a bit just now.
And got it to 86 without much work or me bothering anyone else about it: https://gyazo.com/40fd836f87f8c85fdcefe9d0f5ace63c It did hit 90 a couple times, but 86 was the most common number using Lighthouse. Probably worth mentioning that's on a server where I have a few WP installs doing way too much for way little return. If I disable those sites (most likely), it'll go up a bit just by server response being marginally better. |
Quote:
|
Scripts fine for speed
Issue is bonga/strip and various other cam studios don't display male cams and some don't display couples. You can see it on the demo site Whether the API has changed or not. Who knows |
I got all my tags working just fine, gender, race, age, and language tags all set up to show cams properly
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I will take a look at everything mentioned here when i get back from my ski trip. In the case of stripchat I think you have to make separate API calls for guys vs girls. I have some filters i'm adding for the next update for genders.
Ultimately, the script is still fairly new and it will be built out further as we go along, based on customer feedback. |
Quote:
|
I was wondering why so few male and Trans cams with most of the feeds added.. like no men and Trans from streamate
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I noticed that the tags have dynamic parameters in the URLs which are now indexed in GSC. Anyone know the best way to handle them?
With enough combinations there could be millions of them |
edit: will update with next post...
|
I put some work into CWV for the next update. This is probably close to the best that can be done given the nature of the type of site.
https://i.imgur.com/zfaNFwA.jpg https://i.imgur.com/yyKgyXB.jpg There's really three things here that prevent this from getting super high on things like GTMetrix etc. 1) We are loading the thumbnails from the source sites, because there's no way to download them fast enough to update potentially thousands of models every x minutes, nor would we be able to set a cache time that both pagespeed would like and would actually be useful (since the thumbs are constantly updated). It's also impossible to size the images correctly, because the sites deliver various sizes. 2) I can't move bootstrap out of the the <head> <base href="https://gfy.com/" /><!--[if IE]></base><![endif]--> tag without breaking the layout. I can't move other CSS out of <head> without causing layout shift. 3) I cannot reduce the DOM size much, because of the nature of the thumbnail grid display. IMHO, Pagespeed stuff like this should be taken with a grain of salt. Google would love nothing more then if your site was nothing but times new roman text with basically zero CSS. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Stripchat doesn't pull couple/male and doesn't pull all of trans Cam4 doesn't pull couple/trans LiveJasmin doesn't pull male Xlovecam doesn't pull males but the layout on that site is weird anyway those are the ones I found, others might chime in with others, but I think bonga/stripchat is the most important as they are the more popular sites |
Some minor issues with 1.1.1. Ticket created.
Also some SEO love for those of us using the older template. |
When I try the demo site on desktop it works but when I try on mobile it doesn’t load any cams. Does anyone know why?
https://ibb.co/YydHm4L |
Quote:
|
Quote:
BongaCams doesn't pull Male/Trans - They don't seem to return male or trans models at all in their API. I checked and had absolutely no male or trans in the API response. I suspect you have to use a different API key for these categories? Stripchat doesn't pull couple/male and doesn't pull all of trans - Fixed this, will release in update soon, you also need to increase the number it pulls from 1000 to something higher like 10000 Cam4 doesn't pull couple/trans - Added a selector for this in next update LiveJasmin doesn't pull male - You have to set category to Gay Xlovecam doesn't pull males but the layout on that site is weird anyway - Their API doesn't actually return gender at all. Also fixed it on flirt4free. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I will contact bonga and see if it's an issue on their end |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:15 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123