| Elliot Caine |
12-15-2010 06:42 AM |
I love how both sides use sweeping generalizations and assumptions on how they conduct themselves.
Does the word exploitation come to mind at all? I was top of my class growing up and I did plenty of dumb things based on lack of experience, not intelligence. Thankfully, one of them wasn't posing in front of a camera when I was 15.
What makes you guys think Americans and Russians are different in terms of how we are wired? Do you think human beings have a different type of biology because they are from a different country? Do you honestly think we are all wired that differently?
Child pornography isn't limited to a country or a class of citizen. Its a problem that involves the EXPLOITATION OF MINORS across the world. Why? Because I don't care what your stupid fucking law says, a 15 year old does not have the right amount of experience in life to know exactly what they are doing at the time. Thats why they shouldn't do it.
Using semantics and reading into gray lines just to support your sick fascination with an unhealthy habit is tantomount to assault against minors in my eyes.
That entire article is a passion piece on why CP is misunderstood. Fuck him and his convuloted elitist bullshit. I don't care what type of education you THINK you may have, you are still a scum fuck that just tried to rationalize CP (Directed at the author of this article).
Some of my favorite choice passages from the article -
"The question we should ask is: what kind of a decent life can the society provide for the pedophiles? It is a mistake to believe that pedophiles are monsters. If one is heterosexual, he does not fall over every woman. One is also not in love in every woman. A gay man does not rape every man he sees on the street. It is similar for the pedophiles, they do not feel attracted by every child and even find children sometimes antipathic. The media is world-class in undifferentiating reports."
"The criminalization of child pornography is one of the most stupid decisions ever made - for various reasons. First, the costs of prosecution for possession of child pornography are enormous for the state and often very little results are achieved and after all nothing can be changed about the actual fact that the crime has been committed. A friend's home was searched and had all his computers and 4500 video cassettes - on which he for years had recorded movies - taken. It took 2 years to work through them all and in the process a huge sum of taxpayers' money was spent FOR ABSOLUTELY NOTHING. Because he had recorded TV movies on the video tapes! Germany is very rich, making expensive proceedings for child pornography. Put those who write horror stories and one-sided descriptions in the jail so that it becomes really expensive to the taxpayer [?]. Germany has enough money, so let's just do it.
Secondly, it is justified by the argument that viewing of a child porn picture harms the child. How? The actual exploitation has happened a long time ago! "
Personally for me, I think we should punish the producers of child porn worse that we do rapists. FUCK ALL OF YOU that live in a fantasy land where you think 14 year olds have free will and choice. Seriously, kill yourself.
|
