GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   All internet porn will be blocked to protect children, under UK government plan (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1002573)

Paul Markham 12-20-2010 09:54 AM
The case is always made. "It won't stop the kids who want to see it."

Well what about the millions of kids that don't?

As for a law stopping people who want to break it not being passed. Folks think about that one for more than two seconds with your knees jerking. :winkwink:

If the criteria for passing a law was, IT HAS TO STOP THOSE WHO WANT TO BREAK IT. There would be no laws.

tony286 12-20-2010 09:56 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wehateporn (Post 17784896)
This is exactly what the industry needs, for too long now porn has been on tap, the novelty is wearing off and so people don't join sites much anymore. It you make it harder to get it becomes more exciting again, like when people first started getting the Internet at home and they were going wild joining all kinds of sites.

If you take it away you will make people more hungry again, then when they come to feed they will eat like wild animals
You have a point

Cyber Fucker 12-20-2010 11:24 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by seeandsee (Post 17786127)
more and more filters, people jesus thsi is free world?
not anymore

webgurl 12-20-2010 12:31 PM
Is this new news? :disgust

baddog 12-20-2010 12:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Happy (Post 17784740)
Yes nothing new, they are taking away B-17 as well which will cure and prevent Cancer
Do you believe everything you read on the Internet?


Quote:
In July 1980, the NCI undertook clinical trials of 178 cancer patients who received Laetrile, vitamins and enzymes at the Mayo Clinic and three other prominent cancer centers. The study included patients for whom no other treatment had been effective or for whom no proven treatment was known. All patients had tumor masses that could easily be measured, but most of the patients were in good physical condition. Since Laetrile proponents were unable to agree on the formula or testing protocol for Laetrile, NCI decided to use a preparation that corresponded to the substance distributed by the major Mexican supplier, American Biologics. The preparation was supplied by the NCI Pharmaceutical Resources Branch and verified by a variety of tests. The dosage of Laetrile was based on the published recommendations of Krebs, Jr., and the Bradford Foundation.

The results of the trial were clear-cut. Not one patient was cured or even stabilized. The median survival rate was 4.8 months from the start of therapy, and in those still alive after seven months, tumor size had increased. This was the expected result for patients receiving no treatment at all. In addition, several patients experienced symptoms of cyanide toxicity or had blood levels of cyanide approaching the lethal range

Davy 12-20-2010 03:17 PM
It will be interesting to see what people will do when the government takes their porn away from them. One should think they would riot. But they are probably already too dumbed down and controlled to riot and they will say that "one can always opt-in".
Well, let's hope they wake up when the first news stories go round that this high ranking politician opted-in and gets marginalized for it.

Society is truely doomed if this thing passes.

red-xxx 12-20-2010 03:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by u-Bob (Post 17784725)
porn = mental health issue?
There is no Mental Health Service in the UK.

GatorB 12-20-2010 03:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wehateporn (Post 17784896)
This is exactly what the industry needs, for too long now porn has been on tap, the novelty is wearing off and so people don't join sites much anymore. It you make it harder to get it becomes more exciting again, like when people first started getting the Internet at home and they were going wild joining all kinds of sites.

If you take it away you will make people more hungry again, then when they come to feed they will eat like wild animals
Sorry but porn will be "opt-in" which of course ISPs will gladly CHARGE for. Now if you are paying to "opt-in" for porn why would you pay for a porn site? Wouldn't your attitude be "Hey I already pay for porn"? Even if free many people aren't going to call up their ISP and say "Yes I'm a perv and I would like to see porn on my computer".

Wilsy 01-10-2011 02:01 PM
There was a program about this just now on BBC one and the internet companies have told them it is unlikely they will change to a opt in service

Sarah_Jayne 01-10-2011 02:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by red-xxx (Post 17787281)
There is no Mental Health Service in the UK.
More true than most people know...

V_RocKs 01-12-2011 10:54 AM
Sounds like a bad plan.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:23 AM.
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123