![]() |
Someones gotta pay for all those who don't pay anything at all.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
they will start calling us Southern Canada.... :1orglaugh . |
Quote:
|
Quote:
The current healthcare bill is FULL, packed... with Republican Ideas, it's no where close to what it was originally and recently it has changed even more. Hell, the majority of the bill is a Copy of what Reagan wanted.... It would have been accepted better if the Right/Media/Tea Party didn't spew pure all out lies about it, over and over and over again. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/0..._n_466937.html |
Quote:
|
Rates are going up because costs are going up. The insurance company profits remain at 3% if I'm not mistaken.
Lawyers take a million from the insurance companies every time a doctor makes a mistake. |
Quote:
NO In the age of entitlement, we don't get our own home? Who do I need to talk to, since health insurance is now a right, haha. Ok a forced right.. |
Quote:
health INSURANCE should be abolished. (in it's current form). but yeah.... the age of (perceived) entitlement is done. the police state is here, now. |
Quote:
So the fact is everyone will indirectly have to pay for those that are less healthy, poorer, etc... so I and everyone else in pretty good health and financial position will be worse off... whether that's actually a good thing or not is a completely different topic, that should probably be left to philosophers and academics... |
Quote:
https://youtube.com/watch?v=BBvIweCIgwk |
Quote:
|
Quote:
But we have to pass the bill so you can find out what is in it, away from the fog of the controversy. Nancy Pelosi And yes I know Reagan had the idea of the healthcare reform, other presidents wanted it to, but it was told to them it wouldn't work, that didn't stop Obama, he wanted to pass it anyways. I'm for healthcare reform, but for one that works, I don't think a 2300 page law will work |
Quote:
|
You guys get fucked so hard on a daily basis it's a wonder you haven't revolted. Like $18k a year for health insurance? Really?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Young adults (including stepchildren and adopted children) can be covered under their parents' insurance plans until the age of 26. They do not have to live with or be financially dependent on their parents to be eligible for coverage. Health insurance companies can no longer refuse to provide coverage to children with pre-existing medical conditions. Health insurers can no longer deny coverage when a person becomes ill. Lifetime limits and restrictive annual limits on health insurance coverage are prohibited. New insurance plans must provide coverage for preventative health services without co-pays. Co-payments and deductibles for preventative care visits will be eliminated and personalized prevention plans provided under Medicare. New plans must include an appeals process for addressing coverage determination and claims issues. The income threshold for income-related Medicare Part B premiums is frozen at 2010 levels. The Medicare Part D premium subsidy for those with incomes above $85,000/individual and $170,000/couple is reduced. Health insurers are required to spend more of premium payments on health care and less on administrative costs and profits (80% in individual market plans/85% in large market plans) Health insurance providers are required to provide justification for premium increases to the states in which they provide coverage. Failure to do so will result in their exclusion from health insurance exchanges. A national, voluntary long-term care insurance program will be created. Individuals who pay premiums into this new plan for at least five years will then be eligible to receive daily living assistance support. There are new limits on out-of-pocket expenses, which can not exceed $5,000 for individual coverage or $10,000 for family coverage. Emergency services provided by in-network and out-of-network services must be covered at the same level and must not be subject to pre-authorization rules. Seniors will receive a $250 rebate to help offset the gap in Medicare prescription drug covered, known as the "doughnut hole", between the initial limit in coverage and the point at which catastrophic coverage is available. Several recent articles have reported that most employees can expect to pay more for the health insurance premiums beginning in 2011, due in part to the increase in insurance costs brought about by the law. Health care reform changes affecting taxes The penalty for nonqualified distributions from health savings plans doubles, to 20%. Over-the-counter medications can no longer be paid for with funds from health reimbursement accounts and flexible spending accounts. In order to be covered, a prescription is required. The tax on distributions from a health savings account or an Archer MSA that are not used for qualified medical expenses increases to 20%. The new law mandates that employee W-2 forms include the value of health care benefits provided, regardless of whether those benefits are paid by the employee, the employer, or a both. Those benefits will not be taxed in 2011. The maximum adoption credit increases to $13,170 per child. In addition, the credit is refundable, meaning that eligible taxpayers can get receive the credit even if they don't owe taxes for the year. . |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
If "everyone" was paying in - you would be paying less. Just like on average, you pay more for Insurance right now and care... than the average Canadian does in taxes or any nation with a solid social medical system. |
Quote:
You have no idea if this healthcare reform bill will work... you wont let it work - and most of the right wont work with it to make it better... and that's pathetic. It will take 1000's of pages to change an entire Industry that has 1000's of various factors to it and 1000's of related Companies, before you hit the 100k+ small business in America, and it correctly cover 300 million various Americans. You damn sure aren't getting it done in a few simple pages. |
Quote:
Show me one other system that operates like that. You can't because one does not exist. The simple fact is, the more people paying into a system, the more profits are reaped, not lower costs. More and more people are on pharma drugs today than ever before, yet my costs don't go down. More and more people are connected to high speed Comcast every day.... why aren't my costs going down? More and more people are born (population growth) and buying food every day, why aren't my costs decreasing? show me ONE fucking thing that has DECREASED in price. Anything. horseshit. :2 cents: |
Quote:
My BW bill is probably 10,000% cheaper today than it was 10 years ago. Not a single person in this forum that has been doing this for any number of years that hasn't seen a major decrease. And my long distance is about $5k-$10k cheaper a month now. The same PC I have today is about $1000 less to build today than it was 3 years ago. Some meds, etc are greatly cheaper today than 10 years ago. They normally get cheaper once they've made the investment back - and more and more are costing more to research, etc - thus costing us more, longer. Your food costs go up for a large number of reasons... gas being one major reason. It costs less to mass produce food today, but it costs us more to get it to us than ever before. |
Quote:
How much did it used to cost for the most basic phone or internet plan early on? Like the Doc stated earlier - the more people in a pool, paying towards a common good, could reduce costs. Unfortunately it is all in the management. Half the country does not believe a "for-profit" healthcare system really has our best interests in mind, and the other half does not believe the government would manage healthcare properly either. Both sides are probably correct. |
Thanks obama... Mine went up $1200 for the year for me and the wife... But he said the rates would go down.. Maybe he needs to "go down" on something...
|
20% here...
|
Quote:
That and I want to know where it says it can save money and insure 30 million new people? And Virginia has also ruled that part of it is unconstitutional http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...121302420.html |
Quote:
All I know is we have to do something and sitting around and doing nothing, damn sure wasn't working... So if Obama pissing off a group of people gets the ball moving, in any direction other than the dead direction it was it in, it earns a Bravo from me. |
Quote:
Obama is to blame, seriously? |
Quote:
It was well known in advance, that these rate increases were coming. The various rate increases has been a hot subject for several years now. This isn't the first major rate increase, but it is the first that some confused Americans blame on a President. |
Quote:
My doctor recently charged me another office visit just so she could tell me the results of some lab tests that were part of the previous office visit (results that were non-critical and could easily have been left on my answering machine). Needless to say, she's not going to be my doctor for much longer. With cash-minded doctors like that, no wonder so many of them aren't liking the new system. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I don't have a solution but while there are a number of lazy shits out there, there are also a good number of people who really want to work but there is nothing out there. lower paying jobs won't even hire these people half of the time because they are 'over qualified' and assume they won't stick around. |
Quote:
so, you do not dispute that all the things in my post that start in 2011 are good things? did you ever stop to think that maybe the republicans dont want healthcare reform is maybe because they make a lot more money when there is no govt regulation? again,this is my problem with the entire debate.. people dont do any fact finding for themselves.. its the american way, laziness.... anyway, your post shows that you are in the mix of the uneducated populous that gets all their information from the media and from uniformed dr.s that are pissed because they will get less money and instead of blaming the govt they should be blaming the insurance companies that lobbied so hard to get this bill written the way they wanted it... . . |
Quote:
Say you paying $1800 a month right now with no deductible, if you changed to a $5,000 deductible and lowered your prem to $1400 a month . You take the extra $400 a month and send it to your own health savings account. After 1 year you have enough saved there if you do have to max your deductible you pay it from your HSA. The 5K or so you put into the HSA is tax deductible so you pay less in income taxes at the end of the year. If you don't go to the doctor for a couple years (which sounds like your case) then you can build up a lot of money in your HSA, so instead of paying the insurance and not using it (losing that money) you get to retain the money and get more tax deductions. |
Quote:
And it just went up another 37% starting in February. :helpme Nothing to do with Obama. Everything to do with the bloated, inefficient, crooked health insurance system he had pledged to work on reforming. Moral of the story: huge industries with highly-paid lobbyists win, every time. |
Quote:
http://www.payscale.com/research/US/...doctors/salary I think that it's funny that Lawyers are making laws to control the Doctors |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:55 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc