Yea that's it. I applaud your 1st grade knowledge of US political history.:1orglaugh

the only thing reaganomics is good at is creating a massive wealth division.

If it worked so well why did he then have to pass enormous tax increases to overcome the budget shortfalls. Shouldn't all of those tax cuts trickled down and created jobs and increased tax receipts to the point where no new taxes were needed?

He uh created more than 16 million jobs dude. Also, the defense spending exceeded the profits made by his economic policies. And finally, I said it worked well in the past, I didn't claim it worked miracles.

too bad he royally sucked at job creation, or he could've created more
http://www.huppi.com/kangaroo/6Economy.htm

So vend when they raisr what u have to pay for tricare you will be ok with that? Because i heard thats part of the plan. I love when people say barry is anticapitalist when the rich are having a banner yr. Also something to think about clinton raised taxes 22 mil jobs created.

How hilariously misleading your numbers are. The link was definitely humorous. The only president to create more jobs was Clinton but yea, Reagan really sucked ROFL.

So lets look at the job creation.

In Reagan's first term he created 5.3 million jobs. His second term saw 10.8 million. So he created about 16.1 million jobs. Not bad. But if you look at Jimmy Carter who I think most people will agree was a pretty poor president you will find that Carter created 10.3 million jobs during his one and only term. That means Reagan's best term with all of his policies running full steam ahead only created slightly more jobs than did Carter.

If you look at Reagan, Bush Sr. and Bush Jr and you combine all of the numbers you get 20 years worth of trickle down economics. Combined they created 19.8 million jobs. That is less than Clinton who created 22.7 million.

Sure, you can argue that defense spending exceeded the profits made by the tax cuts, but that is simply a justification for what ails this country across the board no matter who is in charge. They all spend money like crazy. The republicans tend to spend it on defense and use fear as a rationalization for their spending. The democrats tend to spend it on entitlement programs and use guilt to rationalize their spending.

What I am getting at is that there is no real evidence that trickle down economics works any better for job creation than any other system. It seems like any system, if it were combined with actually spending controls, would most likely work because I feel our economy tends to do its own thing regardless of the government's tax policies.

In the last 4 years of democrat control ,under Pelosi , we have not done very well, wouldn't you agree? Time for a game plan change maybe?

You didnt answer my question ? When the right starts cutting programs that effect you and ypur family will that be ok?

Obama signed a delay in the medicare cuts he wanted to help fund the healthcare law, they want to pay my mothers doctors 21% less

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/...aw-avoid-medic

Is that the programs they want to cut that will effect my family? can't think of any other

yes, let's switch back to the other version of the same ol shit. great plan.

You do realize that trickle down economics existed during Clinton's era right?

I didn't say that, you're making up shit again

Of course. I also realize he was called a "tax and spend liberal" by the republicans. He also raised the top tax rate by about 4%.

It doesn't matter, shes a Dem and can do or say nothing wrong. All she says and does is good.

well, to be fair, you don't say much of anything but a bunch of doublespeak bullshit.
And then you say exactly that just about everytime someone calls you out on your bullshit.

http://images.huffingtonpost.com/gen...YING-large.jpg

http://bluecheddar.files.wordpress.c...ingboehner.jpg

http://www.deathandtaxesmag.com/wp-c...1_490568s.jpeg

http://i.telegraph.co.uk/telegraph/m...g_1797835i.jpg

http://www.salon.com/news/politics/w...s/md_horiz.jpg

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_sW65ilskOC...BeckCrying.jpg
http://dc-cdn.virtacore.com/2010/12/...arah-palin.jpg

Ronald Reagan was a homosexual. :2 cents:

Show mke one place where I said Bush did it better. You just get a knee jerk reaction when someone puts down Barry and think if you're against barry. you have to be a republican, I'm not. I don't put down the republicans because well until just yesterday, they had no power, so why would I?

I'm calling you on your bullshit

Amp, is that wishful thinking?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/October...spiracy_theory

you have to admit. it is a compelling theory.


HAHA like you have the ability to admit anything. what, with reagans rotten cock in your mouth and all.

when the fuck was bush brought up?.. who's making shit up here now? I see you in here white knighting john boner. he represents the other version of the same ol shit. therefore you're supporting it. dumbass.

just the facts.

white knighting the same ol shit. :2 cents:

http://www.urbandictionary.com/defin...ght%20syndrome

replace the word female with john boner and this is you vendzilla

I made comments about it, never saying how I feel about it one way or another, at least it's not more pelosi. Boehner was 5.34 trillion dollars ago. I complained about Pelosi, how the fuck can I say I'm for Boehner, no one knows what he's going to do. Which is different from Pelosi, she didn't know what she was going to do.

Can you carry on a conversation without imprecations within the vacuum of reasoning?

yes, it's your absolute refusal to go on record about fucking anything that allows you to doublespeak your way right on out when you get called out.

And where do you find fault in what I posted?

So you're saying I haven't said my opinion on whats going on, just stating facts and you have a hard time debating facts?

I never found fault. never said I did.

the only fact i'm debating is that you're a double speaking retard and john boners personal white knight apparently.

keep that doublespeak coming homie. It's cracking me up

Then why have you reduced yourself to throwing imprecations at me?

Please show me one place where I gave any opinion on John Boenher in this or any thread. You need to change your medications.

Show me where I'm using doublespeak, please

you posted facts in support of john boner.

every god damn reply to me.

Facts? I thought you said doublespeak, there is a difference

Show me, just one, waiting, should I use smaller words?