![]() |
Quote:
But getting back to the OP...what you said is what I thought too. Every piece of news footage I see from the Middle East always has thousands of guys wearing hoods and carrying submachine guns. I've never seen anything like that here in the U.S. I know that if I even tried to walk down the street with a hood and a gun, the cops would shoot me dead. |
Quote:
So yes, we can see that stuff go on here in the US. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
didt read any of this hoo haa, but civilians in egypt do have and can carry guns. Just watching these neighborhood watch people on al jazeera and they have guns and are not police or militarty
|
Your assumng there is a revolution and the citizens win. That they start a gov you like. Say their first act to hang all the porno people in the name of christ. also you cant compare here to the middle east they have been in some form of fighting for over 1000 yrs.
As far as liberals taking away your guns barry was the first ever to sign into law the right to carry guns in national parks. Also having a gun and having the balls to pull the trigger are two different stories. Its easy to say i would shoot people sitting in your safe warm home. |
Quote:
False start with prohibition on alcohol, but getting really kicked up during the Nixon years? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law |
Quote:
Btw, I was thinking the other day that it would be healthy to extend Godwin to offline debates. It's fun to see how many pundits running out of rhetorical ammunition end up resorting to the cheap nazi comparison. (Want to prove that smoking is good? Just mention that Hitler was a non-smoker. Hate pets? Just point out that Hitler was a dog lover.) |
i didn't really read much of this thread. all i know is if the middle east had guys to them as available as they do here, game over. 2012 would definitely be happening, starting with the middle east
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
this will cost more trouble in the country..
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
If the Nazis had faced fierce opposition from their own people, the troupes would have soon lost moral and jumped ship (who wants to be bogged down in a war with their own people?), instead of blindly following a charismatic leader. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
300 million armed Americans would overthrow the government. And imagining our armed forces would take the side of a corrupt government and fire on US citizens is just liberal shit talk from someone disrespecting our military. |
Quote:
Canada exists as a relatively free nation only because the USA borders it to the South. |
Good morning everyone ...
|
Quote:
Quote:
Go do some research on how many trained soldiers in WW2, Korea and Vietnam were actually shooting to kill. The modern army goes into intense training to make them killers. Untrained people with the weapons they have in their closet, against trained killers with some of the most modern weapons ever. No contest. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
The last time the US had the balls to stand up against the rulers was in the 60s and 70s. anti Vietnam war protests. http://static.howstuffworks.com/gif/protest-8.jpg Civil Rights protests. http://www.xtimeline.com/__UserPic_L...4432774936.JPG Those people had balls, they were shot and and killed and kept coming back. I'm afraid to say the US citizens of today don't have the same balls. Getting 10% to uprise is treason, getting 60% is impossible and that's a revolution. When the majority say enough is enough. But dream on that it could happen. Every few years politicians need your votes and they promise you what ever you ask for and kiss your ass for a few months. Once elected the populace takes what ever is dealt to them. |
Quote:
In the real world it would be more like 300,000 tops. Let's take a look at those, outside the army/police, who have guns and have proved they're willing to use them against people. Fuck me the Gangs, gangsters, Far Right, Far Left and nutters. Do you really want these guys in the front line? They would make a real cohesive unit. :Oh crap You guys would shit your pants if these guys were in charge. For those who want to read up on the effectiveness of soldiers there's a lot to read. Intense training today has made the difference. Mr and Mrs Suburbia ain't going to get a look in. No matter what guns they have in their closets. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dave_Grossman_%28author%29 |
I can't believe people on this forum still respond to moeloubani and gatorB. It's one thing being a moron. It's another thing being a moron by your typical adult webmaster standards.
|
Quote:
Also during the civil rights marches police and National Guard also killed marchers. We had balls in those days. I think the size of the balls of some here was summed up by one poster. Something like this. "If I can kill Bambi I can kill someone threatening me." If Bambi had a gun he would shit his pants. :1orglaugh But as you sit by your keyboard acting tough and scratching your beer belly, it's nice to dream of having balls. Quote:
The only way the US masses would uprise in any cohesive fashion is if the Religios Right took over. Then you guys would really need your guns. Otherwise dreaming they would come together and fight is just that, a dream. Would you fight if a leader stole an election? If a leader took you into an illegal war? If a leader ruined your economy? So what exactly would it take? Dictators have a habit of getting the Army and Police well behind them first. Look around at the World. When didn't they? French Revolution comes to mind. Revolution is an option when your kids are dying of starvation. Even the Russian Revolution had soldiers on their side, returning soldiers from the front and the Navy fired on St Petersburg. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
The military is loyal to the government, not the people. Don't for a second think otherwise. Cute how you see things 12clicks but I can tell you grew up living and now live a very spoiled and sheltered life, away from all real life things. Probably wouldn't last the first few days of a revolution sad to say. :( Sorry bud. The way it works would be this: the US president or whoever gives an order to fire on an armed group of rebellious traitors. The military wouldn't want to side with a group of idiots with small guns because they know if the government has even a small fraction of the military support, that small group of idiots will be the losing side. Which military general wants to be the one that sides with what he sees as the losing side? All they care about is honor and pride, they don't give two shits about the people and citizens. |
Quote:
There would be a rifle behind every blade of grass." - Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto (Japanese Navy) Anyone with an ambition to take over the country takes the guns into consideration. The "New World Order" people have to be very sneaky. You're unlikely to see an overtly tyrannical police state any time soon. They would have a fight on their hands if they tried to go door to door rounding people up for internment camps. The rebels aren't going to stand out in the open where the army can use their superior weapons. The US Army is demoralized fighting the sand people. Imagine how they will feel fighting a guerrilla war against Americans. So it is unlikely that the Army will ever be used against its own people, for the simple reason that it won't be easy. |
Those who forget the past are condemned to repeat it.
|
Quote:
http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Isoroku_Yamamoto |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
What exactly did you find dumb about that comment? . |
Quote:
this..... Quote:
|
Quote:
Think of the scenario it would take to bring the people together and then wonder if that would happen. But then some Americans believe the Anti Christ is on his way. The only cohesive faction there is is the religious right. Do you notice he hasn't really answered it, just slinging insults? He will now tell us I'm not worth answering to cover his failure of being able to. |
The size of the balls of Adult Webmasters.
Speaking big on a board. :thumbsup :thumbsup Real action, like confronting Mallick, Ibill or Fabian at a show? :Oh crap :Oh crap Kissing asses to earn a buck. :thumbsup :thumbsup |
Quote:
|
Quote:
its not like any thought goes into the posts. |
Quote:
This is why as a country we're so successful. We have a mindset thats so far beyond what other countries have that you can't even explain it to them. son, you're clueless. |
Quote:
You're ass is going to be owned by the Chinese soon. Look at the labels on all the things you own and see who made them. http://www.dancingsamurai.ca/wp-cont...01/history.gif http://www.kathylien.com/site/wp-con...04/gdp0409.jpg "Made in the USA" is becoming a great way of selling antiques. :1orglaugh Demon I knew you didn't have an answer, with people like you in the fight. How long do you think it will last? |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:20 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc