You and i need to meet, thats all I'm going to say, plus you went over the line, your on my ignore list too

No I said what the 'actual' rate was... just like you discredit what the Gov says Obama has increased jobs by, due to other information - I discredit the inflation rates for more than enough proof.



I assume so... Why? Because he wanted to bow to the corporate oil powers, would be my guess.


Aye, the Germans did benefit from it.. but it had nothing to do with the fall of Russia.


Exactly... and before that no peace talks were taking place under Reagan. An example of that is almost the start of nuclear war in Nov 1983. It wasn't until Gorbachev became president that the "real" ability for peace came about.

Economically they were doomed to fail before Reagan became President... and the chances of Nuclear war were at the highest with Reagan as President.


I've seen them both bow, I've seen the Emperor bow before our leaders and others - so was he saying they were superior to him? No...

No, that wouldn't be according to me.. according me it's a sign of respect and being equal. Not some half translated twisted version you made up in your own head to justify your hate for Obama.

Another ban for Gator, he just can't control himself. Wonder if this will be #3 ban and result in a lifetime goodbye.

are you thanking obama for all of the public sector jobs he created? because its the same thing.

So you're saying the published inflation rate is wrong? LMAO





um, who was he talking to in that speech to broing down the wall?


So you admit the talks started and ended during Reagans presidency that brought down the USSR?

In thoery is what doomed, Reagan getting Opec to raise production and lowering the income of the USSR drove the nail in it

According to them is showing them to be superior, I got that from wikipedia. You might want to look it up before making any mnore statments, not making your point.

I don't know what the fuck is wrong with him and I question if he's even in the business, I've never seen him do anything but post shit

What public sector jobs, Unemplyment rate is what?
Only reason it dropped off last month is because of the 99 weeks

The fact that you don't understand the concept of comparisons proves my point. I'm wondering how someone as stupid as you can pretend to have "loved ones." Now please, keep crying, bitch.:1orglaugh

http://www.journeywoman.com/images6/waaaa.gif

Really? You're comparing private sector jobs to public sector jobs? Wow..

You're arguing with someone who can be considered legally retarded. But it is enjoyable watching him make up shit.

As much as you say the published information about Obama's performance is fake.

It makes no difference who he was talking to.


Never said that... It's a fact that other Presidents started the talks, that is without question.


It would have fallen when it did even if Reagan never did anything...


No, that's according to those that live in the culture, grew up with the traditions and practice them. As for Japan, they respect that we attempt to follow traditions - and don't think it's dishonorable by screwing them up, if we tried... so you can stop pretending as if it makes a difference.

What I stated can be looked up, it has been printed a few 1000 times - adjusted inflation rate's is not a new topic - until it's pointed towards you idiots. It's not my fault your to jacked up on your moms qeefs to know how to use the Internet or read a book.

While the jobs themselves might be in the private sector, without government increasing spending, they would never of existed. you are thanking the president for creating more jobs, so...

The fact that I didn't copy what you said, is proof that you're jacked on your moms queefs again.

And hahaha... boy could you make yourself look anymore stupid - my wife is in this Industry, idiot.

Someone brought Vendzilla's daughter into this? Who would bring a guy's daughter into a discussion on a porn forum?

OH WAIT

It was Vendzilla bringing her up himself. Idiot.

Hate to see that you pushed your daughter into becoming a hit man, if you're at all a good parent you would be begging her right now to forgive you for being such an idiot.

Lots of people kill for money so she wouldn't have been the first to sign up for something like that but it's a shame that your daughter will never again be a good person.

Sign up to be a killer = bad person, for life. Way to ruin your family, dummy.

This is speculative, and bullshit at that. There's nothing to even suggest something like that. Do you understand economics at all? Keep rationalizing though.

Haha, not only are you a stupid porn peddler, but so is your wife? If you have one, I mean no disrespect to her because I feel sorry for her. I sincerely hope she's not doing the actual movies. Yea, you're definitely legally retarded.:1orglaugh

Unemployment is at 9%, been there for 2 years, is that made up?



For your arguments sake, I guess not


And what was the result? They failed to do what Reagan did.
Sort of like if it wernt for the stimlus package, unemployment would have reached 8%?


Show me a link. I went off Wikipedia and found several others, thts what they told us before we went into Japan on liberty.

I didn't know you were mentally challenged, I mean WTF are you talking about?

Hahaha, your statement overly proves that you're a fake nobody in this Industry. :1orglaugh

We need another Ronald Reagan.

Reagan was all about removing those government restrictions and letting the private sector grow, it worked, why would you think that something else is better?

Or maybe spending money we DON'T have is a good thing?

Too bad politicians can only think of their legacy and not their country, country first, that's their legacy!

Top 3 presidents
Washington , pretty damn brave to start this

Lincoln, ran the country in the darkest of it's history, freed the slaves, under him the army was integrated, even though he really didn't have a choice, they needed the manpower

Reagan
Ended the cold war without going to war

Unemployment went up to 9.6% while Reagan was in office, what's your point? It was AFTER 2 years that it started to drop, AFTER he spent money in a stimulus style of the time - that you now hate with Obama.


Reagan was the 3rd round of cold war buildup's. The others failed to have a Russian leader that was willing to work towards peace, making what they did fail - that is correct.


Maybe if the stimulus package was actually all spent... giving it the ability to do that, then maybe we could make that reach. But really not at all, being that a different leader is responsible for it falling.


It's tradition to shake someone's hand here too, we don't really look down on those that hug us, or forget to shake hands - unless we attempted and they did nothing - then we get a bit snuffed over it. Hummm, probably like anyone else would if we didn't honor basic traditions but probably like us we won't get pissed if they don't get it perfectly right.

It's called logic...

I guess I've traveled the world and simply know that basically only the French are stuck enough up to douche you over if you don't get a tradition right.

Very much so. The number is over 20% and over 40% of working aged Americans only have part time jobs. :2 cents:

The cold war ended during President Reagan's term in office but he did not end the cold war. The credit for ending the cold war goes to every administration since 1945...since they all had virtually the same policies towards the Soviet Union. It was this extended policy over the years that brought the end to the cold war...the Soviets could no longer sustain the competition between the two nations. President Reagan only did what all of the other Presidents before him did and that was to keep the pressure on the Soviets.

you said, thank you mr president for increasing spending and creating 16 million jobs. what else is there to get from that?

removing restrictions and letting corporations run amuck is not a good thing in the long run. we've all seen the results of that.

The rates are the same, their methods differ, or didn't you get the memo?

Do you cry over spilt milk? Has nothing to do with the circumstances, it happened under Reagan.


So you're blaming bad management? Obama being in charge of that management?

I love how you argue with logic that doesn't work.
I keep remembering Bruce Lee kicking that guy in the head while he was bowing

Reagan understood that and started Star Wars and got OPEC to increase oil production, Star wars cost too much for them to keep up and the cost of oil went down to take money from the USSR, this pretty much bankrupted them.

The fact that he did one and the other as well? It would be a ridiculous stretch to come to the conclusion that you just did.

What methods differ? They both spent money on job growth, how is that a different method? Reagan spent a hell of a lot more for the time. Something today, you people are going crazy over with Obama - no wait, you ARE going crazy over the same thing!


Well then, technically Wiki has USSR marked to 1991, wasn't that Bush?


Not at all.. even if it was all spent you still couldn't make that comparison.


Yes, logically because that is how the world actually works if you don't live in the culture. Respect is given for trying to learn/use the culture-traditions, it's very common. It's not common to expect or hold others to the same standard outside of your culture.

Because Obama was starting to spar the Emperor of Japan. :1orglaugh

nice birthday thread

Reagan got the money to the jobs, Barry got the money to the bureaucracy


dieing during Reagan, final breathe during Bush, Christmas in 1991

The first free elections in over seventy years occurred in 1989 and reformist politicians swept into power in regional positions across the nation


Why can't I? The money was wasted on bureaucracy
I took years of martial arts, Korean, I think I got the whole bowing thing down

Well I knew this was going to happen, most every GOP congressmen right now is rallying around him being the best Conserative of all time. So the liberal hate mongers got on here and insulted me using my daughter of all things, fucking low.

He was just a great president to me.

Oh please..... both BORROWED the money, BOTH gave a shit ton directly to corporations! The only difference between what they did was, Reagan spent a hell of a lot more money for the time.


Hehe, what year did Bush take office? The point was to show that it happened over a spam of Presidents. Reagan is not responsible for the fall, just like Bush isn't... It's was the combined effort - and the fact that Reagan went back to the policies we had already put in place - rather than almost starting another war by being a dick head - proves he was wrong with his policies.



It's always wasteful. Come on, Reagan was the first to borrow money like he did, doubled our deficit... you don't think his spending didn't come with some bureaucracy? Have you never read anything about him before, ever, outside of Wiki?


Okay? Maybe that will come in handy if you're about to spar someone, I guess...

Reagan got results, still waiting for Barry


You're not going to give anyone credit so why are you bothering with this? According to you the Easter bunny had something to do wit it?



I didn't see 10k dollar signs on the freeways in the 80's
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/signs...ry?id=11163180


It's part of the culture, same thing, bowing lower to your superior is the norm

If you're waiting on Results and using Reagan to compare with, you would need to wait another year for jobs and like 4 more year housing and the rest the eco to turn around.

So I expect I won't hear another bitch or complaint from you about Obama for at least another two years. It was after all Reagan's second term when things fully turned around. And in his first, like Obama - various things ARE and DID turn around.


I gave all Presidents that it happened under credit... I didn't give it all to one because one didn't make it happen.

And if I had to give credit to a single person, it would Gorbachev. The actual person that opened the door of change for the them.


That's because he was busy feeding banks, borrowing money, and putting our Country on a path of destruction it has never recovered from. And pretending like some over spending didn't happen - truly, even half ass trying to make that sound as if it's true, really - shows how blindly you bow to Reagan and instantly reject Obama - simply because.


Yawn... again it's NOT part of the culture to expect others to do exactly as you do or hold them to the same standards. And it is considered very polite, to double bow in Japan - it's like saying hello with the double hand shake.

But hey... to you it can only mean one thing, Obama telling Japan we are inferior... hahaha.

Im not the only one that feels that his approach has failed, you remember the midterm elections, worse loss of a party in 70 years?

I love how you argue this till you hope I give up and call it win, it's not. If you don't think Reagan gets any credit for it, then fine, you still believe that adding 30+million people on entitlements is going to save money!


That path happened over how long. I mean the democrats had control of the house and senate for the last 4 years, but you are going to blame the GOP?


So you're saying that Barry was not informed about the customs on bowing?

That just proves how stupid many people are, they can't remember modern history.

Oh my, that was so normal... it had been going heavy one-way for for awhile, this was expected before Obama was even name to became President.

Is this really a factor you guys look at? Hahaha..


I'm not trying to change your opinion... I'm trying to show how hypocritical your thoughts are on the subject.

We aren't talking about saving money and it has nothing to do with what we're talking about.


See... you can't tell the difference between Presidents. That's what Reagan was doing and yes Bush did it too.




Sure.. probably more like, nobody gave a fuck because it's not important...

Reagan brought the wall down... I haven't laughed so hard the whole week.

I have nothing against him, about his impact on american economics and politics i don't know enough. But he had as much influence on the Berlin wall coming down as had David Hasselhoff - just a few words from an actor.

George Bush Sen. deserves a lot of respect for what he did and first and foremost a big percentage of the 16 million eastern germans who went out demonstrating every week despite of the danger of being arrested.

I love how you laugh about and offer nothing in substance as to the difference.

There were a lot of factors that both brought down the wall and ended the USSR, but Reagan was a major factor in that, to deny that would be to rewrite history.

you like covert wars?
you like big government spending and deficits?
:1orglaugh:1orglaugh