GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   .XXX Just Went Live on the Roots - Sex.XXX Resolves! (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1018680)

JFK 04-16-2011 07:55 PM

Fitty XXX Dilemas

DBS.US 04-16-2011 07:57 PM

I clicked on the .xxx link and my Mac got a Trojan, a Virus, a Worm, and other Malware.:helpme
I'l never click on a .xxx link again.


Posted on my iPhone5

blonda80 04-16-2011 11:07 PM

i won`t buy any xxx

baddog 04-16-2011 11:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DWB (Post 18062783)
Didn't someone pay like 14 million dollars for sex.com and these ass hats just jacked sex.xxx from them.

Excuse me while I get my LULZ on.

That sounds like they are not honoring anything they have suggested.

nyllover 04-17-2011 02:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackCrayon (Post 18063058)
xxx to a lot of people means hardcore porn, and yeah like you said many porn sites don't fit into that at all.

That's one of the MANY reasons why all this xxx thing is just plain bullshit. Our sites are considered to be of an adult nature...but surely aren't hardcore...so? All these people pretending to "protect children" with the XXX domains?

...it's sunday... let's avoid getting angry about this shit...

AdultKing 04-17-2011 03:05 AM

buy a .xxx domain and ensure your site is blocked, yep good one

Dreamteam 04-17-2011 03:24 AM

Quoted from there faq section here:
http://www.icmregistry.com/about/faq.php

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6. Do I need to give up my other adult domains in other TLD?s such as .com?
No, .XXX is a purely voluntary domain and you can continue to use your other existing domains . We expect, over time that .XXX will become the preferred domain name of choice by both the consumer and provider of online adult entertainment.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I specialy like this part:

"We expect, over time that .XXX will become the preferred domain name of choice by both the consumer and provider of online adult entertainment"


I realy hope they did not calculate their whole financial plan on this quote.

Do they realy believe this shit? lol ...

FlexxAeon 04-17-2011 03:50 AM

game on....

Fabien 04-17-2011 04:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nikki_Licks (Post 18062340)
Beings I am a non supporter of this .xxx scam, I will not be buying any......:2 cents:

Count me IN !
FOR REAL no like some of you who already pre registered some shit :321GFY or worst, bought some !

Fabien 04-17-2011 04:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by goldassets (Post 18062418)
I've reserved a ton of one word adult .xxx names, I'm sure I'll do amazing with them while everyone here is crying in their beer.

Yeah and i'm sure you have tons of tube sites, torrent sites etc...

Nice, very nice :321GFY

40 posts 2011
Fuck i'm getting old i guess:Oh crap

cherrylula 04-17-2011 05:31 AM

Hell yeah, pre-install the filters on new computers and keep all the fucking non-paying teenage boys off my porn sites! The real customers will know where to go.

.xxx baby, good to go.

u-Bob 04-17-2011 05:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cherrylula (Post 18064063)
Hell yeah, pre-install the filters on new computers and keep all the fucking non-paying teenage boys off my porn sites! The real customers will know where to go.

Adult webmasters who are serious about their business have been labeling their sites using icra, rta and safesurf tags for a long time already. That way parents can prevent their children (who have no credit cards) from visiting your sites with 100% accuracy.

there's no need for some stupid .xxx tld to do that.

Besides, once .sex, .pron, .gay etc are approved, .xxx domains will be even more useless/worthless.

u-Bob 04-17-2011 05:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 18063770)
That sounds like they are not honoring anything they have suggested.

Not the first time the ICM registry has lied to the industry, the press, ICANN,...

cherrylula 04-17-2011 05:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by u-Bob (Post 18064072)
Adult webmasters who are serious about their business have been labeling their sites using icra, rta and safesurf tags for a long time already. That way parents can prevent their children (who have no credit cards) from visiting your sites with 100% accuracy.

there's no need for some stupid .xxx tld to do that.

Besides, once .sex, .pron, .gay etc are approved, .xxx domains will be even more useless/worthless.

I know so many parents who have zero idea about those things and would not know what the hell they are. Dumb it down, .xxx, there you go. I never sent traffic to those orgs that just want you to link them on some pretense you are a "responsible" adult webmaster. Whatever. pfft.

btw:

Quote:

Upon the recent decision of FOSI's Board of Directors, the ICRA labeling engine has been discontinued. While all current labels will continue to work with Internet content filters, the ICRA label generator, ICRA tools and Webmaster support will no longer be available.
http://www.icra.org/

gee I'm sure that works reallllly well. ::snickers::

If I link that page, it makes me responsible?

Sorry, but you want to talk about serious and responsible, use a .xxx. What is the problem? Why are people so against this? All you naysayers will see. The internet is still a baby.

DWB 04-17-2011 06:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 18063770)
That sounds like they are not honoring anything they have suggested.

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_T7O_yHqa25...r-surprise.jpg

Surprise... Surprise!

DWB 04-17-2011 07:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by u-Bob (Post 18064072)
Adult webmasters who are serious about their business have been labeling their sites using icra, rta and safesurf tags for a long time already. That way parents can prevent their children (who have no credit cards) from visiting your sites with 100% accuracy.

We ran a poll around two years ago on a few of my sites asking if they knew how to block online porn from their kids. 94% of them said they didn't know how.

It looks responsible, but it's crap. It's just a tag to show other webmasters that you are trying to do the right thing and to justify putting explicit images and videos on a tour.

If we all really wanted to protect kids, every tour, banner and free site would be PG only. Explicit content found only in the members area. That would be the responsible thing to do, but it would never happen.

cherrylula 04-17-2011 07:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DWB (Post 18064153)
We ran a poll around two years ago on a few of my sites asking if they knew how to block online porn from their kids. 94% of them said they didn't know how.

It looks responsible, but it's crap. It's just a tag to show other webmasters that you are trying to do the right thing and to justify putting explicit images and videos on a tour.

If we all really wanted to protect kids, every tour, banner and free site would be PG only. Explicit content found only in the members area. That would be the responsible thing to do, but it would never happen.

what I was saying... thank you...

It is not our responsibility to "protect" anyone's kids. I wouldn't even let my kid loose on youtube, let alone the entire net!

Instead of being negative, I am hoping that in the long run (xx years) this will make the wild world of adult internet more filtered and streamline the traffic.

and personally, I have so many porn/adult .com's, I am looking forward to scrapping a bunch for one .xxx.

change is a coming, gotta keep up!

cherrylula 04-17-2011 07:11 AM

in fact, too bad there won't be some gateway to .xxx with a paywall where we can get a cut sending traffic. That would be so awesome. lol

u-Bob 04-17-2011 07:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cherrylula (Post 18064081)
http://www.icra.org/

gee I'm sure that works reallllly well. ::snickers::

If I link that page, it makes me responsible?

Sorry, but you want to talk about serious and responsible, use a .xxx. What is the problem? Why are people so against this? All you naysayers will see. The internet is still a baby.

the tags still work... and there's rta and safesurf tags.

u-Bob 04-17-2011 07:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cherrylula (Post 18064081)
I know so many parents who have zero idea about those things and would not know what the hell they are. Dumb it down, .xxx, there you go. I never sent traffic to those orgs that just want you to link them on some pretense you are a "responsible" adult webmaster. Whatever. pfft.

Quote:

Originally Posted by DWB (Post 18064153)
We ran a poll around two years ago on a few of my sites asking if they knew how to block online porn from their kids. 94% of them said they didn't know how.

Their children, their responsibility. It's not my job to raise their children. If 94% of parents out there want to let their children surf the internet without monitoring and/or restricting what they (can) visit, than that is their choice, their responsibility. If a parent drops his/her 7 year old of at a shopping mall en comes back in the evening to pick him up... than that's simply a bad parent... no need to put any burden on shop owners...

CyberHustler 04-17-2011 07:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DWB (Post 18062783)
Excuse me while I get my LULZ on.

:thumbsup

u-Bob 04-17-2011 08:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cherrylula (Post 18064081)
http://www.icra.org/

gee I'm sure that works reallllly well. ::snickers::

If I link that page, it makes me responsible?

1. you don't need to link to those sites to use those tags.
2. as a business owner you have 1 responsibility: to your business. To protect your business. If adding existing tags that identify your adult sites as 'adult' to your sites (at no cost) reduces the risk of government interference in your business, than that is a sound/responsible business decision.
3. Is 'hoping for a more filtered internet" a good business decision? Is 'asking large corporations to install filters on their operating systems in an attempt to somehow limit your bandwidth costs ($70/y for a .xxx that blocks access to minors without a credit card vs $8/y for a .com)' a good business decision? Is 'hoping for others to enforce certain rules on an entire industry, rules you have no control over, rules you have no say in,... in an attempt to somehow reduce your competition' a good business decision?

TheDA 04-20-2011 02:52 PM

When are .xxx available to register?


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:45 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123