very weird. So i should be disgusted everytime i take a piss or whatever... hm im not, because uncut is NORMAL... very weird that some americans think cutting is the way to go. Why in the fuck would you do that?

very very weird that this primitive ritual is so normal in a western country that even some chicks think its gross?? wtf! talking about a weird form of brainwashing... i cant imagine a girl here would even debate it, since it's a non-issue here in this country, except for muslims.

no don't
uncut for the win

google image search for botched circumcisions

Because you believe the bullshit reasons the people that mutilated you told you just before they cut part of your cock off?

Just a guess.

People are fucked, why have part of your babies penis cut off?

The to look like father is hardly a good reason.

Plenty of adult men who are cut, that are upset about it.

http://foreskin-restoration.net/forum/

Uncircumcised men have a higher pain threshold than circumcised. And I'm glad I wasn't cut, tolerating pain is useful.
And I've had more girls curious to see my uncut cock recently than be scared of it so the sex things a bonus right now!

this has kind of turned into a ridiculous conversation. I'm uncut and I am grateful that my junk was left alone. I have heard women say things like they looks gross or they are unclean I even had sex with a woman that was convinced it would give her a vag infection.

I am lucky because most of the girls are curious about an uncircumcised penis since most have not seen them; at least here in the US they are much less common. As far as them looking gross the most common response I have gotten is that the lil feller is cute, not helpful for the ego but certainly not 'gross' or 'disgusting' either

Lack of circumcision:

? Is responsible for a 12-fold higher risk of urinary tract infections in infancy. Risk = 1 in 20 to 1 in 50 for uncircumcised infants and 1 in 200 to 1 in 500 for circumcised infants. Higher risk of UTI at older ages as well. Overall lifetime cumulative prevalence of UTI = 1 in 3 for uncircumcised males compared with 1 in 20 for circumcised males, respectively.

? Confers a higher risk of death in the first year of life (from complications of urinary tract infections: namely kidney failure, meningitis and infection of bone marrow).

? One in ~400?900 uncircumcised men will get cancer of the penis, which occurs more than 20 times more commonly in uncircumcised men. A quarter of these will die from it and the rest will require complete or partial penile amputation as a result. (In contrast, invasive penile cancer never occurs or is extraordinarily rare in men circumcised at birth.) (Data from studies in the USA, Denmark and Australia, which are not to be confused with the often quoted, but misleading, annual incidence figure of 1 in 100,000).

? Higher risk of prostate cancer (50?100% higher in uncircumcised men)

? Is associated with 3-fold higher risk of inflammation and infection of the skin of the penis. This includes balanitis (inflammation of the glans), posthitis (inflammation of the foreskin), balanoposthitis (inflammation of glans and foreskin), phimosis (inability to retract the foreskin) and paraphimosis (constriction of the penis by a tight foreskin that will not return after retraction). Up to 18% of uncircumcised boys will develop one of these by 8 years of age, whereas all are unknown or much rarer in the circumcised. Risk of balanoposthitis = 1 in 6. Obstruction to urine flow = 1 in 10?50. Risk of these is even higher in diabetic men.

? Means increased risk of problems that may necessitate 1 in 10 older children and men requiring circumcision later in life, when the cost is 10 times higher, the procedure is less convenient, and the cosmetic result can be lesser, as stitches or tissue glue are required, as compared with circumcisions done in infancy.

? Increases by 2?4 fold the risk of thrush and sexually transmitted infections such as human papillomavirus (HPV), genital herpes (HSV-2), syphilis, chancroid, Trichomonas vaginalis and thrush.

? Is the biggest risk factor for heterosexually-acquired AIDS virus infection in men. 2 to 8-times higher risk by itself, and even higher when lesions from STIs are added in. Risk per exposure = 1 in 300.

? In the female partners of uncircumcised men lack of male circumcision is associated with an up to 5 fold higher incidence of cervical cancer (caused by sexually transmitted HPV), genital herpes, Trichomonas vaginalis, bacterial vaginosis (formerly called ?Gardnerella?), and possibly Chlamydia (which is a cause of pelvic inflammatory disease, infertility from blockage of fallopian tubes, and ectopic pregnancy).
Getting circumcised will result in:

? Having to go through a very minor surgical procedure that carries with it small risks.

? Improved hygiene.

? Much lower risk of urinary tract infections.

? Much lower chance of acquiring HIV, the AIDS virus, heterosexually.

? Virtually complete elimination of the risk of invasive penile cancer.

? Slightly lower risk of prostate cancer.

? More favorable hygiene for the man?s sexual partner.

? Much lower risk of cervical cancer and Chlamydia (and thus infertility and other problems) in the female sexual partner.

? More favorable sexual function and experience, with no reduction in sensation during arousal or in the sensitivity of the flaccid penis.

http://www.circinfo.net/images/wiswe...sprevented.jpg

Ewwwwww Yuck!!!

I am glad you are a expert on the conscious inner thoughts of a female.

Sorry about your foreskin man :(

you're nicely brainwashed. Say, uncut girls are EWWWWW and YUCKY too. Care to chop off your clit, you gross uncut slut?

alright.. who here doesn't come from blowjobs

come on boys

consider this a support group, we'll describe how it's supposed to feel

As an adult, you personally have serious issues introspecting everyone thinks as you do.
But of course, you live in that perfect world.

This can't be real :disgust

My mom paid extra to make my Penis perfect and pretty. No joke, she actually did. And I'm glad it worked out the way it did.

Get your penis cut by a pro penis cutter, your family Dr. can give you good names of guy's in your area. Not the one that pulled your head from your mothers womby vagina. You might think they are the pros because they deliver 20 babys a week. No. Cause they don't take time when they do it and then every Penis look's the same or equally shitty.

oh
 

Oh it's real alright.. it's never to late...

QFT, glad my parents had me cut.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh I just made a appointment. Actually I didn't, Jesus can you imagine getting it chopped at 30? Hell no.

doctors say hands are much cleaner if you chop them off :2 cents:

The rate of testicular cancer amongst men with no testicles is almost 0% therefore chopping off one testicle should cut testicle cancer rates by 50% while still allowing for the ability to father children.

Mandatory testicle removal at birth is the only answer ( plus no ball sweat )


p.s. imagine how much your kid will get teased if his circumcision leaves him lacking the ability to ever have sex , like many circumcisions do..

Here ya go tardo:
http://www.who.int/hiv/topics/maleci.../en/index.html

say that in your head the next time you fuck some hottie who suprises you with bushells of armpit hair and leghair like a gorilla :1orglaugh we all have issues.

female circumcision often involves the removal of the outer labia, imagine how strange a vagina would look if you had only seen ones with no labia.. would look like someone threw some dirty sleeping bags down there

i'm not sure i trust that study... 60% decrease seems awfully high to be just noticing this now.. could be other factors at play , africa is teeming with hiv. would the study show the same numbers in usofa

in Malawi, the HIV rate is 13.2% among circumcised men, but only 9.5% among intact men. In Rwanda, the HIV rate is 3.5% among circumcised men, but only 2.1% among intact men.

these stats seem to show the exact opposite

I don't have an aversion to a woman who grows her pubic hair or armpit hair either. In fact, ex of mine decided to see how long she could grow her pubes before one of us couldn't stand her "naturalness" any more.

I won.

I had my son circumcised. I too am circumcised and grateful that i am.

granted im american and it is sort of normal to have it done here.

i dont think really is a right of wrong answer, just depends on what you are more comfortable with

That's an assertion on your part that is based solely on your own sensitivities and insecurities concerning the male anatomy.

It's not a perfect world. I realize that and accept that fact.

Might I add that I'm not the one advocating to cut a slice of skin off of the head of infant penises to appease someone's warped and mutilated idea of what a penis should look like.

no way, it is barbaric. rather i would teach them to wash it regularly like any other body part. would cut it only if doctor would say it is urgent due to some medial reason..

These threads always crack me up, it becomes clear right away who is circumcised and who isn't. It seems impossible to ever have any type of objective discussion because those that are uncut argue vehemently against circumcision and those that are cut say they love it and have no problem with it. I love these sensational terms that get thrown around like mutilate, barbaric, hack off, etc.... as well as these exaggerated analogies, come on give me a break.

I'm cut and I could care less either way. I've been present up close at a circumcision, and it didn't seem to hurt the baby and appeared to be no big deal. Having read a few dozen of these threads on gfy, it seems that uncircumcised guys get so ultra defensive at anyone who suggests they'd favor circumcision and I've never understood why. We can argue back and forth on the negligible health issues around each, but bottom line its just a choice by parents based on their preference.

I'd cover every inch of my kid with marker after birth NOT to circumsize it.

Absolutely not.

I'm with you on this one, I got the snip at 28 years old due to medical reasons, I was shit scared and did fuck loads of research and met with my GP a few times, he re-assured me of the benefits, it's not dangerous or that painful and stated many similar facts with less risk of STD infections etc which has been proven over and over.

statistics can be misleading. doctors make 0$ when you are uncut and big$$ when you get cut :) theres alot of room there for pushing an agenda. Do you think "jiffy lube" would make $$$ if they told people " you don't need an oil change "

for example sunscreen lotion, several studies say that it may prevent skin cancer overall , but those who use it regularly have an increase in the most dangerous forms of skin cancer.

it may be that getting cut prevents std's but it could also be that the std's you do get kill you because your body has no built in immunity. Not saying this is a fact , simply that statistics can be misleading..

Take the study of the op.. several studies in africa show 50%+ decrease in hiv after getting cut , yet the actual occurance rate is higher among cut men. How is that even possible ? because the study is almost pointless. Hard to extrapolate results from a flawed study.

i would trust these studies more if they pointed out such obvious mistakes and showed related data alongside .. for example. what is % of hiv among cut at birth men vs uncut in usa

comin straight from the horses mouth
tell us more :1orglaugh

I'd definitely circumcise my kid. Why wouldn't I want him to lose 40% of the nerves in his dick. Seems irresponsible to want him have pleasure later in life.

If you're actually worried that your kid is incapable of using a soap (or, shower gel, if he prefers) in the shower daily then I don't think you should actually have a fucking kid.

Might as well circumcise your daughter as well. Might make her lose a bit more than 40% of her nerves down there, but hey, it's an acceptable practice among morons.

Circumcision is NOT common in any civilized country except for the US. It's not just Eastern Europe that doesn't do it. It's, basically, not done at all in Europe. It's even been discussed in the EU to make male circumcision illegal.

it was back in the 80's , big hair and spandex , the doctor was watching full house on tv while chopping the weiner, slipped and cut the whole end off. DAMN YOU OLSON TWINS !!!

but seriously , you shouldn't have sex with horses sicko.

If you don't want to traumatize your children ... just don't conceive them.

So what I can get from this thread...Circumcision is a cultural standard in the US, and it is not standard in Europe. I'm not angry with those that have foreskin...What's with the anger towards those that are circumcised or have circumcised their children? I have never looked down there and said "WOW...I was mutilated!"

It is true...In the US, uncircumcised males sometimes face locker room torment for being different, and not all women in the US are open minded with uncut cocks. I am sure the same stigma would follow a cut male in a European country. It's nothing more than a cultural difference.

Congrats! You have more nerve endings! I have plenty of sensation in my cut wangler. For those worried about the trauma...I highly doubt any cut men remember being cut when they were babies, or those men wouldn't do it to their sons. Just agree to disagree, and move on.

oh and one other thing, when you get cut, it toughens up so now i last 2 minutes rather than 1 in the sack... win for me and her :)