GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   tube8 (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1024570)

DVTimes 05-31-2011 09:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ArsewithClass (Post 18179915)
You idiot, I dont lie.

It works for me either way. Magazines & websites do email & phone to ask if they can promote or use our content to fill their websites with us, as they know were genuine. If I had posted them all, then so be it, more guys, more money, more content.


However, You still havent said which accountant you use after saying that you dont have to show who & what you pay out to.... Post or its a lie :thumbsup

so you admit all the posts (screen shots) of ALL the forum posts were done by you.

thats ok then.

ArsewithClass 05-31-2011 09:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DVTimes (Post 18179901)
gary i think you should post an apology to me as your stating that some of the posts I posted (sreen shots) that they are fake and not by you.

In otherwords your saying i faked them.

please post which ones you did not post.

When did I say you faked them??? :1orglaugh I told you I had to repeat things 3 times for you to understand...

the 3rd time, here you go...

Sometimes, magazines & websites, phone & email us to see if they can use our adverts, photos, details, so they know there are genuine people in there websites & mags. Many profiles & numbers in mags are fake...

Now go away you senile old bald prat :2 cents:

DVTimes 05-31-2011 09:40 AM

gary i tell you what, you post evidence (screen shot) of your site stats (as you said you would) then i will post my accountant. deal.

DVTimes 05-31-2011 09:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ArsewithClass (Post 18179928)
Now go away you senile old bald prat :2 cents:

thats not nice is it.

ArsewithClass 05-31-2011 09:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DVTimes (Post 18179923)
so you admit all the posts (screen shots) of ALL the forum posts were done by you.

thats ok then.

OMG! Seriously.... go away... no, some are not placed by Natalie or me, but they are genuine, the sites are not fakes or frauds, they probably rang or emailed & asked if they could borrow photos, content or details...

Damn, thats a 4th time.


Is divvy a joke? :1orglaugh

DVTimes 05-31-2011 09:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ArsewithClass (Post 18179928)
Sometimes, magazines & websites, phone & email us to see if they can use our adverts, photos, details, so they know there are genuine people in there websites & mags. Many profiles & numbers in mags are fake

i posted a few links.

can you tell me which are fake and which are real as i will contact the ones you claim to be fake to confirm.

ArsewithClass 05-31-2011 09:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDA (Post 18179277)
That should have been 1:550'ish actually and it's not 'just a banner' but I get your point. :)

Divvy, you really continue like a child.. now stop :Oh crap

ArsewithClass 05-31-2011 09:45 AM

Ok people, GFYers, lovelys & nice people....


I give up with this moron.. Im going for a bath & enjoying some food....


Believe as you shall, do as you want! One thing I recommend is to sign up to gspotcash now, start promoting proper good British porn & begin making good money.

martinsc 05-31-2011 09:51 AM

http://img294.imageshack.us/img294/1175/dogface.gif

DVTimes 05-31-2011 09:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ArsewithClass (Post 18179963)
Ok people, GFYers, lovelys & nice people....


I give up with this moron.. Im going for a bath & enjoying some food....


Believe as you shall, do as you want! One thing I recommend is to sign up to gspotcash now, start promoting proper good British porn & begin making good money.

odd

i think the best brit sites can be seen at www.britbird.com - in fact its no 1 (or was) in google for british babes. its odd your site is not there. oh thts right, they suck. he he.

CyberHustler 05-31-2011 09:55 AM

lmao @ getting caught acting clueless... what a backfire.

The Porn Nerd 05-31-2011 10:12 AM

NEW RULES:

1. Any thread featuring Arse With Class that is longer than 2 pages long will NOT be read or commented on. Let's stop encouraging this nutter.

2. For those Brits who want to cock-block and ass-fight with each other should have their own "Brit-centric" forum.

3. Debates over definitions should be BANNED.

Both parties here are correct:

Arse With Class is a Pimp, his wife is a Whore, they film dangerous sex scenes with strangers (no condoms, no testing) and then put actual (tested) adult performers at risk by not disclosing their sex with unprotected strangers.
They film it all so, in the end, it's "content" and ultimately legal.

Is it "right"? Heh, please.
Is it "moral"? Double please.
Would any clear-thinking human engage is such practices? Of course not.

Carry on.

WarChild 05-31-2011 10:15 AM


WarChild 05-31-2011 10:19 AM


DamianJ 05-31-2011 10:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MisterPeabody (Post 18180076)
NEW RULES:

1. Any thread featuring Arse With Class that is longer than 2 pages long will NOT be read or commented on. Let's stop encouraging this nutter.

2. For those Brits who want to cock-block and ass-fight with each other should have their own "Brit-centric" forum.

3. Debates over definitions should be BANNED.

Both parties here are correct:

Arse With Class is a Pimp, his wife is a Whore, they film dangerous sex scenes with strangers (no condoms, no testing) and then put actual (tested) adult performers at risk by not disclosing their sex with unprotected strangers.
They film it all so, in the end, it's "content" and ultimately legal.

Is it "right"? Heh, please.
Is it "moral"? Double please.
Would any clear-thinking human engage is such practices? Of course not.

Carry on.

quoted for excellence

WarChild 05-31-2011 10:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DVTimes (Post 18179158)

http://www.topnews.in/light/files/Gary-Glitter2.jpg

WE OBEY THE ONE!

DWB 05-31-2011 10:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ArsewithClass (Post 18179225)
Thanks mate... our lifes a little horny at the best of times :thumbsup

I'd shoot a load in her. Bareback is the only way to fuck IMHO. :thumbsup

But you should know by now that you can't make any sense of your lifestyle choice to those who do not understand it and fear it.


Quote:

Originally Posted by DVTimes (Post 18179106)
fact: you admit you take money for pimping nat. that makes you a pimp.

fact: you admit nat takes money for sex. that make her a prostetute.

fact: you admit nat has sex with people she does not know without a condom. these are strangers paying for sex. with no health certificates.

fact: nat has sex with real porn models who do not know nat is having sex for cash without a condom with strangers.

If that sort of thing bothers you, you're in the wrong business. :2 cents:

And if you think she's the only one fucking "strangers" raw when they are off the set, you are in for a rude awakening. I can't tell you how many porn girls I've dropped loads into when they were not on the set. From new girls off the bus to a Vivid girl who demanded I cum in her ass, and everything in-between. A large majority of the girls escort and a very high percentage of them will do it bareback. And even many of those who want to use a rubber will often cave if you get them horny enough and will be pulling you deep into them when you shoot your load.

People like to fuck how they want to fuck, and those in the sex industry tend to be a little wilder than most.

WarChild 05-31-2011 10:25 AM

Somebody please photoshop Gary Glitter's head on to Gary's picture beside the mule from the post above. K thx.

RazorSharpe 05-31-2011 10:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MisterPeabody (Post 18180076)
1. Any thread featuring Arse With Class that is longer than 2 pages long will NOT be read or commented on. Let's stop encouraging this nutter.

Yes because obviously everyone needs to listen to what YOU tell then to do! - Please!!!

Quote:

Originally Posted by MisterPeabody (Post 18180076)
2. For those Brits who want to cock-block and ass-fight with each other should have their own "Brit-centric" forum.

There are arguments on this board almost every single day featuring a melting pot of cultures and races but YOU want a "Brit-centric" forum?? - Double please!!!!


Quote:

Originally Posted by MisterPeabody (Post 18180076)
Arse With Class is a Pimp, his wife is a Whore, they film dangerous sex scenes with strangers (no condoms, no testing) and then put actual (tested) adult performers at risk by not disclosing their sex with unprotected strangers.
They film it all so, in the end, it's "content" and ultimately legal.

I don't condone what he does but if you want to go about bandying your rhetoric as fact then you're just as bad as his protagonists. I am speaking specifically about the part where you state "no testing". If I'm not mistaken, he has said several times that they do in fact get tested.

Have a good day MisterPeabody (and I mean this with the utmost sincerity) and please don't go all ninja on me for this post; I'm merely trying to point out a few things that seemed wrong with your post.

DWB 05-31-2011 10:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MisterPeabody (Post 18180076)
Would any clear-thinking human engage is such practices? Of course not.

It is debatable if I am a clear thinking human or not, but I would engage such practices.

ArsewithClass 05-31-2011 10:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MisterPeabody (Post 18180076)
NEW RULES:

1. Any thread featuring Arse With Class that is longer than 2 pages long will NOT be read or commented on. Let's stop encouraging this nutter.

2. For those Brits who want to cock-block and ass-fight with each other should have their own "Brit-centric" forum.

3. Debates over definitions should be BANNED.

Both parties here are correct:

Arse With Class is a Pimp, his wife is a Whore, they film dangerous sex scenes with strangers (no condoms, no testing) and then put actual (tested) adult performers at risk by not disclosing their sex with unprotected strangers.
They film it all so, in the end, it's "content" and ultimately legal.

Is it "right"? Heh, please.
Is it "moral"? Double please.
Would any clear-thinking human engage is such practices? Of course not.

Carry on.

Mate, no time do we put adult performers at risk :(

We have had several performers in our filmed shoots, of which we have always said no to escort clients at least 2months before, taken a test the following month & then seen the adult performers!

Please dont write things you know nothing about, as you end up following the heard. Divvy has lied about my wife being a whore, considering we film most if not all sessions. I am not a pimp, due to earning the money with her.

ArsewithClass 05-31-2011 10:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RazorSharpe (Post 18180153)

There are arguments on this board almost every single day featuring a melting pot of cultures and races but YOU want a "Brit-centric" forum?? - Double please!!!!

.

No arguements here, I was only asking a question for a friend who was here at the time :(

DVTimes 05-31-2011 10:36 AM

http://justnico.com/images/2kntj93irev72uxzc.jpg

WarChild 05-31-2011 10:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DVTimes (Post 18180178)

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:thumbsup: 1orglaugh:pimp:1orglaugh

DamianJ 05-31-2011 10:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ArsewithClass (Post 18180162)
we have always said no to escort clients at least 2months before, taken a test the following month & then seen the adult performers!

Gary, you've been told this before, but 6 months is what you need. Not two. So if you are working with professional porn stars (something I doubt), then you most definitely, unarguable, categorically ARE putting them at risk.

"What is a window period?

The ?window period? is a term used to describe the period of time between HIV infection and the production of antibodies. During this time, an antibody test may give a ?false negative? result, which means the test will be negative, even though a person is infected with HIV. To avoid false negative results, antibody tests are recommended three months after potential exposure to HIV infection.

A negative test at three months will almost always mean a person is not infected with HIV. If an individual?s test is still negative at six months, and they have not been at risk of HIV infection in the meantime, it means they are not infected with HIV."

http://www.avert.org/testing.htm

You are putting the whole UK industry at risk.

DVTimes 05-31-2011 10:45 AM

http://justnico.com/images/wtmpd42u8a2rqvifs2nw.jpg

DVTimes 05-31-2011 10:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DamianJ (Post 18180214)
Gary, you've been told this before, but 6 months is what you need. Not two. So if you are working with professional porn stars (something I doubt), then you most definitely, unarguable, categorically ARE putting them at risk.

"What is a window period?

The ?window period? is a term used to describe the period of time between HIV infection and the production of antibodies. During this time, an antibody test may give a ?false negative? result, which means the test will be negative, even though a person is infected with HIV. To avoid false negative results, antibody tests are recommended three months after potential exposure to HIV infection.

A negative test at three months will almost always mean a person is not infected with HIV. If an individual?s test is still negative at six months, and they have not been at risk of HIV infection in the meantime, it means they are not infected with HIV."

http://www.avert.org/testing.htm


You are putting the whole UK industry at risk.

but he can tell if you have aids by just looking at you.

so its ok.

ArsewithClass 05-31-2011 10:57 AM

Divvy. You & warchild are disgusting inidviduals. Paul Gads had so much child porn on his pc that It makes me sick that you even have the thoughts to remember the sick individual.

ArsewithClass 05-31-2011 10:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DamianJ (Post 18180214)
Gary, you've been told this before, but 6 months is what you need. Not two. So if you are working with professional porn stars (something I doubt), then you most definitely, unarguable, categorically ARE putting them at risk.

"What is a window period?

The ?window period? is a term used to describe the period of time between HIV infection and the production of antibodies. During this time, an antibody test may give a ?false negative? result, which means the test will be negative, even though a person is infected with HIV. To avoid false negative results, antibody tests are recommended three months after potential exposure to HIV infection.

A negative test at three months will almost always mean a person is not infected with HIV. If an individual?s test is still negative at six months, and they have not been at risk of HIV infection in the meantime, it means they are not infected with HIV."

http://www.avert.org/testing.htm

You are putting the whole UK industry at risk.

I dont think the whole industry is at risk when we have not filmed other adult industry workers for a few years.

Maybe you should be a spokes man for the whole of the porn industry, problem is, most of your facts are bullshit :thumbsup

WarChild 05-31-2011 11:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ArsewithClass (Post 18180260)
Divvy. You & warchild are disgusting inidviduals. Paul Gads had so much child porn on his pc that It makes me sick that you even have the thoughts to remember the sick individual.

Dude I'm sorry you look like Gary Glitter. Don't read anything more in to is than that.

DVTimes 05-31-2011 11:09 AM

http://justnico.com/images/w9hv6rx26pkf4po3gurx.jpg

DVTimes 05-31-2011 11:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ArsewithClass (Post 18180267)
I dont think the whole industry is at risk when we have not filmed other adult industry workers for a few years.

Maybe you should be a spokes man for the whole of the porn industry, problem is, most of your facts are bullshit :thumbsup



a few years?

on 01-30-10 you were contacting a model on a forum about doing shoots?


thats not years.


http://justnico.com/images/95almcindk1rua3hfz0.jpg

DVTimes 05-31-2011 11:29 AM

01-27-10 you state your seeking a model for a sat shoot.

so again not years is it?

adverts placed on a forum used by the uk pornstars.

http://justnico.com/images/h5yfgx3ufkaogtmde73j.jpg

DVTimes 05-31-2011 11:33 AM

And 01-25-10 on the porn contact forum your contacting more uk pornstars to work with.

so while you claim its been years, in fact its rather recent.

its rrather destubing dont you think?

http://justnico.com/images/2mso30avdoyapk5wyo3v.jpg

fatfoo 05-31-2011 11:38 AM

ThatOtherGuy sure gave a lot of information. Maybe he is right.

DVTimes 05-31-2011 11:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ArsewithClass (Post 18180162)
Mate, no time do we put adult performers at risk :(

We have had several performers in our filmed shoots, of which we have always said no to escort clients at least 2months before, taken a test the following month & then seen the adult performers!

Please dont write things you know nothing about, as you end up following the heard. Divvy has lied about my wife being a whore, considering we film most if not all sessions. I am not a pimp, due to earning the money with her.

its getting better. it was only a month last time:


https://gfy.com/showpost.php?p=17480302&postcount=217

http://justnico.com/images/yv8bhx72hzej20apnlvm.jpg

ArsewithClass 05-31-2011 11:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WarChild (Post 18180286)
Dude I'm sorry you look like Gary Glitter. Don't read anything more in to is than that.

No probs... Ill accept what you say :thumbsup

DVTimes 05-31-2011 11:55 AM

its such a shame though gary that you think the tests are worthless.

https://gfy.com/showpost.php?p=17480374&postcount=222

http://justnico.com/images/8i8gi3gcqqwnimmipk.jpg

DVTimes 05-31-2011 11:57 AM

http://img269.imageshack.us/img269/3426/tombstonet.jpg

ArsewithClass 05-31-2011 12:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DVTimes (Post 18180373)
01-27-10 you state your seeking a model for a sat shoot.

so again not years is it?

adverts placed on a forum used by the uk pornstars.

http://justnico.com/images/h5yfgx3ufkaogtmde73j.jpg

I thought you had been talking about Natalie? Whether she has interacted with other adult performers? :error

We do have many websites & film professions footage other than with Natalie.... That film on the Saturday was filmed with a girl called Sally. A girl boy film shot in an outdoor location, in a pub to be honest. Where they met & went back to my home, in the studio, where I have an hours worth of girl boy film... :winkwink:


I think you should stop acting like a complete twat divvy.


This is about the 10th thing that you have either found incorrect information or used wrong information, & most of all, managed to make a tit of yourself :thumbsup

ArsewithClass 05-31-2011 12:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DVTimes (Post 18180430)

This is total harassment divvy...


We have never created a problem in the adult industry, we care for ourselves more than yourself, our home & studio is clean & hygenic, as are we.

We hardly use paid performers (for the use in natalies footage as this is who or what we was talking about). But when we have, we have had several months between that time, plus we get and have been tested regular...

Wont it be ironic, when you catch something & die after putting that on that jpg above. Your disgusting divvy :disgust

DVTimes 05-31-2011 12:05 PM

the hot car

http://justnico.com/images/v7dz2wa3hxi17ir8ys.jpg

ArsewithClass 05-31-2011 12:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DVTimes (Post 18180441)
its such a shame though gary that you think the tests are worthless.

https://gfy.com/showpost.php?p=17480374&postcount=222

http://justnico.com/images/8i8gi3gcqqwnimmipk.jpg

Read it again... I said, the tests are worthless considering you dont know what the models partners have been doing over the past nights or days.

I think, most of the time, even in the business, even with models, you have to go on trust, respect & risk.... :2 cents:

I wouldnt trust you ever divvy :warning

ArsewithClass 05-31-2011 12:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DVTimes (Post 18180463)

You really are a jealous individual :helpme

DVTimes 05-31-2011 12:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ArsewithClass (Post 18180453)
This is total harassment divvy...


We have never created a problem in the adult industry, we care for ourselves more than yourself, our home & studio is clean & hygenic, as are we.

We hardly use paid performers (for the use in natalies footage as this is who or what we was talking about). But when we have, we have had several months between that time, plus we get and have been tested regular...

Wont it be ironic, when you catch something & die after putting that on that jpg above. Your disgusting divvy :disgust

its not harrasment.

you stated that you have a two month break and i pointed out you stated 1 month, then get a test, then have sex.

just dd not want you to look silly.

anyway i am off out now.

chow.

hope i helped you a bit.

ArsewithClass 05-31-2011 12:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DWB (Post 18180136)
I'd shoot a load in her. Bareback is the only way to fuck IMHO. :thumbsup

But you should know by now that you can't make any sense of your lifestyle choice to those who do not understand it and fear it.

People like to fuck how they want to fuck, and those in the sex industry tend to be a little wilder than most.

No probs :thumbsup

Thanks for the compliment to Natalie, I appreciate it & she does too.. :winkwink:

Its a shame for the industry, we have to put up with 2 or 3 individuals that are ignorant to the fact that they actually have content of girls doing exactly the same job as Natalie. Infact, its quite ironic & amusing that Divvy wants to make an uproar about the escorting & must think the models live an innocent life when they are not working :2 cents:

ArsewithClass 05-31-2011 12:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DVTimes (Post 18180470)
its not harrasment.

you stated that you have a two month break and i pointed out you stated 1 month, then get a test, then have sex.

just dd not want you to look silly.

anyway i am off out now.

chow.

hope i helped you a bit.

No, youre bothered that you have spent all afternoon proving nothing apart from the fact that Natalie & I make decent footage thats worth selling with great sales stats, proven from theDA & that we film other models with other models.

Thanks for your time & great of you dropping by :thumbsup

RazorSharpe 05-31-2011 12:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DVTimes (Post 18180447)

That is bang out of order, you should be ashamed of yourself!! Jackass!!!

DVTimes 05-31-2011 12:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RazorSharpe (Post 18180506)
That is bang out of order, you should be ashamed of yourself!! Jackass!!!

your right.

i am disgusting.

i feel bad as i am making nat do unprotected sex for a few pounds with strangers.

ooops. thats not me, thats gary, her husband.

dam.

all i did was post a pic.

which do you think is worse. me posting a pic or gary getting his wife to do unprotected sex for a few pounds.

have a think about it.

i am off out.

chow.

ottopottomouse 05-31-2011 12:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DVTimes (Post 18180178)

Too wrong. She's old enough to be the grandmother of someone he wants :error


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:23 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc