so you admit all the posts (screen shots) of ALL the forum posts were done by you.

thats ok then.

When did I say you faked them??? :1orglaugh I told you I had to repeat things 3 times for you to understand...

the 3rd time, here you go...

Sometimes, magazines & websites, phone & email us to see if they can use our adverts, photos, details, so they know there are genuine people in there websites & mags. Many profiles & numbers in mags are fake...

Now go away you senile old bald prat :2 cents:

gary i tell you what, you post evidence (screen shot) of your site stats (as you said you would) then i will post my accountant. deal.

thats not nice is it.

OMG! Seriously.... go away... no, some are not placed by Natalie or me, but they are genuine, the sites are not fakes or frauds, they probably rang or emailed & asked if they could borrow photos, content or details...

Damn, thats a 4th time.


Is divvy a joke? :1orglaugh

i posted a few links.

can you tell me which are fake and which are real as i will contact the ones you claim to be fake to confirm.

Divvy, you really continue like a child.. now stop :Oh crap

Ok people, GFYers, lovelys & nice people....


I give up with this moron.. Im going for a bath & enjoying some food....


Believe as you shall, do as you want! One thing I recommend is to sign up to gspotcash now, start promoting proper good British porn & begin making good money.

odd

i think the best brit sites can be seen at www.britbird.com - in fact its no 1 (or was) in google for british babes. its odd your site is not there. oh thts right, they suck. he he.

NEW RULES:

1. Any thread featuring Arse With Class that is longer than 2 pages long will NOT be read or commented on. Let's stop encouraging this nutter.

2. For those Brits who want to cock-block and ass-fight with each other should have their own "Brit-centric" forum.

3. Debates over definitions should be BANNED.

Both parties here are correct:

Arse With Class is a Pimp, his wife is a Whore, they film dangerous sex scenes with strangers (no condoms, no testing) and then put actual (tested) adult performers at risk by not disclosing their sex with unprotected strangers.
They film it all so, in the end, it's "content" and ultimately legal.

Is it "right"? Heh, please.
Is it "moral"? Double please.
Would any clear-thinking human engage is such practices? Of course not.

Carry on.

quoted for excellence

http://www.topnews.in/light/files/Gary-Glitter2.jpg

WE OBEY THE ONE!

I'd shoot a load in her. Bareback is the only way to fuck IMHO. :thumbsup

But you should know by now that you can't make any sense of your lifestyle choice to those who do not understand it and fear it.


If that sort of thing bothers you, you're in the wrong business. :2 cents:

And if you think she's the only one fucking "strangers" raw when they are off the set, you are in for a rude awakening. I can't tell you how many porn girls I've dropped loads into when they were not on the set. From new girls off the bus to a Vivid girl who demanded I cum in her ass, and everything in-between. A large majority of the girls escort and a very high percentage of them will do it bareback. And even many of those who want to use a rubber will often cave if you get them horny enough and will be pulling you deep into them when you shoot your load.

People like to fuck how they want to fuck, and those in the sex industry tend to be a little wilder than most.

Somebody please photoshop Gary Glitter's head on to Gary's picture beside the mule from the post above. K thx.

Yes because obviously everyone needs to listen to what YOU tell then to do! - Please!!!

There are arguments on this board almost every single day featuring a melting pot of cultures and races but YOU want a "Brit-centric" forum?? - Double please!!!!


I don't condone what he does but if you want to go about bandying your rhetoric as fact then you're just as bad as his protagonists. I am speaking specifically about the part where you state "no testing". If I'm not mistaken, he has said several times that they do in fact get tested.

Have a good day MisterPeabody (and I mean this with the utmost sincerity) and please don't go all ninja on me for this post; I'm merely trying to point out a few things that seemed wrong with your post.

It is debatable if I am a clear thinking human or not, but I would engage such practices.

Mate, no time do we put adult performers at risk :(

We have had several performers in our filmed shoots, of which we have always said no to escort clients at least 2months before, taken a test the following month & then seen the adult performers!

Please dont write things you know nothing about, as you end up following the heard. Divvy has lied about my wife being a whore, considering we film most if not all sessions. I am not a pimp, due to earning the money with her.

No arguements here, I was only asking a question for a friend who was here at the time :(

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:thumbsup: 1orglaugh:pimp:1orglaugh

Gary, you've been told this before, but 6 months is what you need. Not two. So if you are working with professional porn stars (something I doubt), then you most definitely, unarguable, categorically ARE putting them at risk.

"What is a window period?

The ?window period? is a term used to describe the period of time between HIV infection and the production of antibodies. During this time, an antibody test may give a ?false negative? result, which means the test will be negative, even though a person is infected with HIV. To avoid false negative results, antibody tests are recommended three months after potential exposure to HIV infection.

A negative test at three months will almost always mean a person is not infected with HIV. If an individual?s test is still negative at six months, and they have not been at risk of HIV infection in the meantime, it means they are not infected with HIV."

http://www.avert.org/testing.htm

You are putting the whole UK industry at risk.

but he can tell if you have aids by just looking at you.

so its ok.

Divvy. You & warchild are disgusting inidviduals. Paul Gads had so much child porn on his pc that It makes me sick that you even have the thoughts to remember the sick individual.

I dont think the whole industry is at risk when we have not filmed other adult industry workers for a few years.

Maybe you should be a spokes man for the whole of the porn industry, problem is, most of your facts are bullshit :thumbsup

Dude I'm sorry you look like Gary Glitter. Don't read anything more in to is than that.

a few years?

on 01-30-10 you were contacting a model on a forum about doing shoots?


thats not years.


http://justnico.com/images/95almcindk1rua3hfz0.jpg

01-27-10 you state your seeking a model for a sat shoot.

so again not years is it?

adverts placed on a forum used by the uk pornstars.

http://justnico.com/images/h5yfgx3ufkaogtmde73j.jpg

And 01-25-10 on the porn contact forum your contacting more uk pornstars to work with.

so while you claim its been years, in fact its rather recent.

its rrather destubing dont you think?

http://justnico.com/images/2mso30avdoyapk5wyo3v.jpg

ThatOtherGuy sure gave a lot of information. Maybe he is right.

its getting better. it was only a month last time:


https://gfy.com/showpost.php?p=17480302&postcount=217

http://justnico.com/images/yv8bhx72hzej20apnlvm.jpg

No probs... Ill accept what you say :thumbsup

its such a shame though gary that you think the tests are worthless.

https://gfy.com/showpost.php?p=17480374&postcount=222

http://justnico.com/images/8i8gi3gcqqwnimmipk.jpg

I thought you had been talking about Natalie? Whether she has interacted with other adult performers? :error

We do have many websites & film professions footage other than with Natalie.... That film on the Saturday was filmed with a girl called Sally. A girl boy film shot in an outdoor location, in a pub to be honest. Where they met & went back to my home, in the studio, where I have an hours worth of girl boy film... :winkwink:


I think you should stop acting like a complete twat divvy.


This is about the 10th thing that you have either found incorrect information or used wrong information, & most of all, managed to make a tit of yourself :thumbsup