marco, eastwood or what ever your other names are. Even retard will know that there is a big difference between blind traffic you're buying and text link traffic that surfer actually clicking because its relevant to him. But you're a fucking dumb ass and comparing apples and oranges. Weren't you supposed to compare multiple brokers anyway? I guess you haven't saved enough dough for that. :321GFY

SE traffic - 0.37%
:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Ah ok. So premium just means from what country they are coming, it doesnt say anything about the quality of the traffic, although you are still selling it for $4/k.

Im sorry choker, but you are pretty bad with your excuses, this is coming straight from YOUR site:

http://www.iblametubes.com/c7.JPG

Yep sure looks like its all that premium we are looking for. LOL :thumbsup

Ok enough stats and screens for today. Remember choker, you ASKED me to post these stats. Dont go crying about it now :winkwink:

Hate to thread crap but Ive made sales from Chokers traffic.

:1orglaugh

most of your traffic before this buy was from Hungary, LOL

LOL, this is a completely new site, hate to break it to you but you and your fake buddies might wanna try a different approach because its making you look retarded. :1orglaugh

Thats because you are a fake nick and Marco/Eastwood are real.

You know the answer and so does anyone else who's been in the business for longer than a week.

Fuck SE traffic. Vietnam and Turkey do the best. As in Vietnam and Turkey traffic on your shitty one click tube. Thats right, number one and two countries on that site. :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh Oh, and lets not forget 0.37% SE.

What you are not telling people is that you bought much more than 27k from me, in fact 70% of your sites traffic is from me. Your site gets about 4k a day with 3k a day coming from me. Strange how most of the traffic you buy from me your not running thru a linking url, just sending it straight to your site. Your reasoning for doing this is?


http://www.chokertraffic.com/screenshots/screenshot.gif

LOL! Funny how retards value alexa for their intel hahaha. Noob.

I guess gfy.com is all Uruguay and Hungary too. Damn, you make yourself look more ridicilous everytime you post boy.

Go get your fake nick to mommy, she wants her basement back :1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Dude give it up. The stats are more then clear. I explained it how many times now? 5-6 times?

You got exactly what you wanted me to prove. There is no way around it, no dancing, no tippietoeing out of this one choker..

I dont have to explain anything, the numbers are up there for everyone to see. Go to bed, and make up some other excuses about this part of your traffic tommorow im sure you can give it another try.

Im not comparing the conversion here, or the sales (if any) im making of your total traffic. That will be a whole different thread believe me. When the time comes, and you have send me ALL you owe me, i will be so polite to post those stats too, dont you worry about that at all :1orglaugh:1orglaugh Untill that time is there, this is what you asked me to prove. And this is the proof being posted.

Cant handle it? To fucking bad, shouldnt have asked it, i warned you you wouldnt want me to post the stats, now go cry me a river. Ask your fake fucks here to back you up, maybe they can call you and give you a shoulder to cry on.

Just finishing up a 30k U.S. traffic test campaign from Traffic Holder and the results are disappointing. Choker won't let me give him a PayPal deposit for testing. Purchased traffic is a waste of time.

Not all purchased traffic.

This traffic, yes, this is crap beyond any level of crappyness. To be honest, i never checked and saw anything worse then this portion of the traffic im getting from choker.

Someone explain something to me please about this screenshot:

http://www.iblametubes.com/c1.JPG

Why is "MeganFoxxx" in the URL?

It seems to me that 99.99999% of any traffic with this keyword will be from people looking for "Megan Fox" so of course the bounce rate would be extremely high. It doesn't matter if people are coming to this site looking for Megan Fox or people leaving a site with a model named "Megan Foxxx", this is guaranteed to be useless traffic.

selling traffic does not pay the bills. all traffic sellers are affiliates too. they have all tested their traffic on different sponsors, landing pages, and ads and they never sell converting traffic.

just my :2 cents: not knocking any traffic broker in particular..

i like all these screenshots from both sides btw. although i think the thread is a little too agro to be professional. try acting like cursing, insulting fools in a real office and see how long you guys last. this thread could produce results if everybody wasn't being dickheads..

its called a name. People have names. some people have the same or similar name. :winkwink:

Oh what a charmingly delightful little spat you two ladies are having. I suggest meeting for a couple of appletinis and working all this dreadful business out. Toodles .....

My question was, Why was the name in the URL?

Here's my point.

If there is a gallery of images somewhere of a girl named "Megan Foxxx", it's extremely likely that most of the traffic to this gallery is bad because it is mostly coming from searches or links for "Megan Fox".

Therefore, the traffic on this page is already low quality because people found "Megan Foxxx", not "Megan Fox". By "Bad Traffic", I mean pissed-off people who have been misdirected to that page.

Now, let's assume that people on this page saw a text link for exactly what they were looking for on Jack Sparrow's website. JAck's site would have a hard time converting this pissed off customer, wouldn't you agree?

Considering the very high bounce rate, this has to be at least one of the things going on with this traffic.

Trolls deserve nothing more then that to be honest.

And yeah, i act like this when someone behaves in my office, in real life too. If they cant handle it they can go work for 50% less at the local coffeeshop.

No offense to you btw, i catch what you are saying :thumbsup

ya but this isnt SE traffic and the visitor didn't have a choice to go there. they were auto redirected from a Choker site. Jack is basically testing different redirect traffic on various cam model pages. the Megan Fox reference is irrelevant.

the focus should be on finding the right type of traffic to send to the right landing page or banner. Choker has a lot of traffic options. popunders are my particular favorite.

one thing i learned is redirect traffic from tgps, tubes and cam sites do not convert at paysites. Jack is doing a test campaign to see if Choker traffic converts with cams.

as with any market testing, it is expensive and yields poor results until you figure out what type of traffic converts for what site. you can't do a complete evaluation for a few hundred $$. a professional company like Manwin probably spends over $1k a day on marketing.

No its not like that at all.

The traffic is send through chokers system to a reflink that redirects the click to a live cam show of one of the girls in the network.

He isnt sending it with a textlink or anything. Im not even sure how these sites are sending it to be honest.

But the fact remains, that the time on site is 0:00 so even it was misleading they wouldnt even be able to know because they didnt even see the site load.

So that means its not the site itself, its the portion of traffic of the sites/traffic choker is sending me traffic from. If its not the sites itself, its chokers system. Either way, point still is that there is something definatly not good with this.

Well then, there ya fuckin' go.

Thanks for confirming what I've suspected all along. They exploit their good traffic and sell the shit.

:Oh crap

You are kind of misrepresenting the stats there.

0 time on site does not mean that they did not let the site load. It means that they only visitied one page and ga can't tell how long they spent on site.

From Google Analytics Support: http://www.google.com/support/forum/...ed9f8fe8&hl=en

The answer to this question should be on par with an inability to analyze stats from GA/Urchin as well . . .

wow ,this traffic is really sucks

If buying traffic made people more money then the cost of the traffic, then why do those people not buy all of it and get rich?

bottom line, nobody would sell productive traffic...

Hi PK,

Ok sorry, I didn't realize that Jack knew that all of this was redirect.

On a related note, we NEVER buy redirected traffic. I hate it when I'm redirected. I close my browser and never, ever click thru no matter what the deal is. I assume most surfers are like me and would do the same thing, so redirects, pop-up/unders, spam, are all worthless to me.

Lots of reasons:

- It's expensive
- It's a gamble
- Market conditions change
- Content changes
- It takes time to convert surfers into buyers
- Not all surfers are buyers
- What's hot today is cold tomorrow
- What's new today is on tubes tomorrow.

etc..

This thread is on fire.

On a sidenote, i just watched my first orca/killer whale in real life. From the private jacuzzi on the porch of the cabin. Canada fucking rules!

doesn't he send traffic from his network of skim tubes like this?

http://www.thesextubesite.com/

looks like 100% skim.

Amen brutha.

Holy shit i dont hope so. Thats some nice sherlocking right there,
If thats considered US_PREMIUM i dont know what anything not premium would look like to be honest,

Maybe choker can clear up what is considered premium, because people, especially newbs, will consider something sold for $4/k high quality and not something skimmed and from a site like that.

not much detective work, just an example from choker's traffic site. though would explain the high bounce if so.

clicked a thumb and took me to:

http://www.myfreeporncams.com/cam/Ju...=1&AFNO=choker

so yeah must be one of the sources.