As for the owner of the dog...that killed the smaller dog...legal liability...different states have different laws...but in...at the least some states...the owner of the dog is legally liable for what ever damage their dog does...no matter the circumstance...period.

Also in...at least some states...pets are legally considered to be property and one can only receive the value of the property upon death and whatever vet bills may be involved. Loss...or pain and suffering...are not a legal consideration...only the actual monetary loss is legally considered.

Natural dog behaviour is another matter ? huh Have you ever had a female dog in heat ? it will not let another dog sniff it's butt, it will snap at anything that tries.. if you happen to be the size of a teacup, a small snap can be deadly..



i doubt you can read minds with dogs you heard about in a news story ..:winkwink: you have no idea if the dog had rape on it's mind

no it isn't at all , dogs who don't want their butts sniffed will let others know by growling or baring fangs, if the other dog continues to try and sniff it's butt it will bite , attack whatever you wanna call it.

anyone who has been around dogs for any period of time has seen this plenty of times, it has nothing to do with training,behaviour,breed,size. It is an instinct..

bullshit.. so if my dog is in my fenced yard , and you drive drunk , crash through my yard run over my dog , he gets up and shits on your back seat, you seriously think i would be liable for the stain on your back seat ?

i think not..

In the ops case the owners of the teacup dog knowingly brought their dog into an unsafe situation. You shouldn't bring a teacup sized dog around large dogs period. My dog's feet are larger than some of those tiny dogs. It could easily kill one simply by laying on it or accidently stepping on it.

You all to frequently use ludicrous analogies...and I prefer not to have intercourse with people that are clown's...but to answer your question...I tend to doubt that you would be liable for the shit stain of a dog that I had criminally injured...but I do think you would be liable if the dog attacked me and caused me to be out medical expenses which of course would be offset by the damages that I would owe for the destruction of your fence and the medical expenses for your injured dog.

In the case of the original poster I do know that...in at least some states...the owner of the dog that killed the smaller dog...would be 100% iiable.

Moral of the Story, it's a fucking dog!! GET OVER IT!

that sucks.. kill the dog

Moral of MY story is that you're a human - basically a more intelligent (I use the term very loosely), larger, and more destructive life form than a cockroach. You DO realize that the planet you live on - and the Sun you live under - doesn't care whether you're a person, a dog, a goat, or the massive colony of ants that are fucking up my front yard.

You DO realize that when there's a natural disaster, "God" doesn't say, "Hmm - there's humans there. Better not unleash that Tsunami. Better not flood that city!"

You are no more important than a dog. Actually, part of being a human being is caring for - and helping - other beings that are less fortunate than us.

BTW - feel free to pop up here and fuck with my "fucking dogs" anytime you want. They're loving, they're loyal, they're honest, they're protective. Four attributes that I doubt you understand.

And when they're done picking your bones clean, I'll give you a proper burial along with the rest of the trash in my big plastic bin.

What a piece of shit you are.

sorry for your loss. small claims court and the big dog should be put down

guilty as charged..
wait wait.. i use ludicrous analogies and you are talking about having sex with clowns..??

you fucking sick clownophobic :disgust:1orglaugh

umm you just said , "the owner of the dog is legally liable for what ever damage their dog does...no matter the circumstance...period."

so which is it ?


not sure if i trust your legal advice, you just stated 2 opposite legal advice above. One saying owner is always liable , one saying he isn't liable

besides i have never seen any law that uses the terminology " bigger dog / smaller dog "

lol fuck you, you are so on ignore tranny bitch :pimp

Thanks, that's the plan :)

The only sensible thing to do would be to kill the dog, it's owner, a couple of hookers, and Julia Roberts

but first cut off julias lips and sew them on to a fleshlight:thumbsup

I love this.

Some self righteous mother fucker telling someone who sees more value in human life over that of an animal, that he's a piece of trash.

:1orglaugh

Pretty much what you wrote!

Let's see here...........................

Not one but TWO dog "owners" who understand fuck all about canine behavior, who introduce dogs under very poor conditions and one dog gets killed, probably quite unintentionally by the other dog, so now it's all about who to fucking sue!

Why is it not about which HUMANS should get fucking BRAINS?