Has Alex ever had a successful project?

:thumbsup

hahahahahahahahahahaha :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Fuck what this .xxx loving nalem wants.....:2 cents:

I am teaching my 3 year old to use a digital camera. She actually does a better job.

So following your train of thought :

The Asian Jesus would just eat his dog.


Right?

fuck nalem for requesting that takedown
 

FUCK the ICM Registry
FUCK NALEM
FUCK the .xxx tld

FUCK the ICM Registry
FUCK NALEM
FUCK the .xxx tld
FUCK the ICM Registry
FUCK NALEM
FUCK the .xxx tld

FUCK the ICM Registry
FUCK NALEM
FUCK the .xxx tld
FUCK the ICM Registry
FUCK NALEM
FUCK the .xxx tld

FUCK the ICM Registry
FUCK NALEM
FUCK the .xxx tld
FUCK the ICM Registry
FUCK NALEM
FUCK the .xxx tld

FUCK the ICM Registry
FUCK NALEM
FUCK the .xxx tld
FUCK the ICM Registry
FUCK NALEM
FUCK the .xxx tld

FUCK the ICM Registry
FUCK NALEM
FUCK the .xxx tld
FUCK the ICM Registry
FUCK NALEM
FUCK the .xxx tld

FUCK the ICM Registry
FUCK NALEM
FUCK the .xxx tld
FUCK the ICM Registry
FUCK NALEM
FUCK the .xxx tld

FUCK the ICM Registry
FUCK NALEM
FUCK the .xxx tld
FUCK the ICM Registry
FUCK NALEM
FUCK the .xxx tld

Fuck NALEM

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:thumbsup

I would just call it a Fan Sign thread, no?

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Is this dude gay or just looks like one?

For More Family Photos :winkwink: Visit NALEM Now

NALEM, fuck off nobody wants you here idiot.

And cut with spamming GFY with your threads, I haven't seen you pay for advertising so a ONE TIME announcement is all you're allowed, not ten of them.

http://i56.tinypic.com/29qfr89.jpg
http://i56.tinypic.com/29qfr89.jpg
http://i56.tinypic.com/29qfr89.jpg

Who has popcorn?

Damn this guy seems to be the most hated man in hobiz lol

NO. Ownership/copyright is established by taking the photo. I believe a model release is typically needed for commercial purposes/advertising.

Anywhere you're allowed to be, you can take photographs. You would then own the copyright. You can then post the picture online, your flickr account, even sell copies of the photo. You cannot use the photo in an advertisement without permission.

That's simply not true, and good luck finding a court case to back that up.

Copyright protects the original work, it doesn't grant rights to logos, trademarks, people, likeness, etc of anything within the picture, simply because someone took it (in some cases it does). Those are unique rights, that have to be granted before the image is used.

with Flickr you're choosing to publish your pictures with your own limitations. Nobody is saying you can't sell/buy or whatever, what you own. But you have to make sure you are not in violation of trademarks, etc, first.

Well, try to sue someone for something you think you own, but you never registered the copyright on it. Like if I make music beats, just like yours, but I created it as well. Or if I shoot a video (my work) with your art work or song in the background, of my kids ballgame then sell that to other parents to pay for costs/time, good luck on that copyright as it's not what is being sold. And yes... to truly be protected, you need to 'actually' copyright it - otherwise you're pissing in the wind.

You can definitely sue someone that violates your copyright, or send them a DMCA notice, and it's not just "pissing in the wind". Either way will get them to stop infringing your copyright. You can do this because the photographer owns the copyright to the photo the minute it's taken.

If you register your copyright, you can sue for statutory damages up to $150,000.

THAT is the benefit that registering provides.

You can sue for any reason, that doesn't mean you will win or get money.

For DMCA to be valid you need to have registered your copyright just like the infringing person needs to be a registered agent to be protected under DCMA. To truly be protected, you need to register on both ends.

Yes, we know if you take a picture, the picture has a copyright on it. But that doesn't grant your exclusive rights/ownership to everything in the picture, just the actual work, the actual photo, the digital or printed item, as a whole work.

Aye, you can sue for that amount, but it's awarded based on the total violations of your content vs non violations of your content - and not anything else or other peoples violations. So if I have 1 picture that is yours out of a million that aren't yours, the awarded amount will be micro as the earnings from it would be equal to its use.

You DO NOT need to register your copyright in order to file a DMCA notice.

nalem fucking sucks

Couldnt anyone he took a picture of request for the image to removed?

No offense to you Nalem but you're are a relatively new person in this business doing something JFK has done well for years.. And you support .xxx which is one of the dumbest most hated things by everyone who has morals in this biz.. so you can not really expect people who have been in this business for years working hard to build their brands to be happy with any of this shit!

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

yeah i've never had a problem getting something pulled, quick and easy

Watch out Nalem! DWB has some people waiting for you at the next show you attend...
http://nikito.com/crowd.jpg

p.s. You're a douche for taking the $ from ICM, hope any reputation you had was worth what they are paying :2 cents:

I didn't say you did... I said to be protected under it or to truly be protected under it, then yes, you do. It's actually written in the law, both directions.

I was going to copy/paste but it's kinda big. Copyright Act, Chapter 5 section 512c2 - This covers the registered agent, and the key part is "and by providing to the Copyright Office, substantially the following information:" - Register yourself so people know who to bitch to.

Scroll up to Section 508a - key part "and registration number of each work involved in the action."

The key words, are AND, it doesn't say OR, it says AND. If you want to be protected under DMCA, you need to register as an agent. And if you want to use DMCA in your fight, then your work needs to be registered so ownership is proven.

Kinda silly to argue the law.

I agree, so let's take a look at this paragraph from an actual attorney:

"If you find a Web site that is using one of your images without permission, contact the hosting ISP to report the infringement. The letter you send is called a ?DMCA takedown notice.? The ISP is required to make its agent?s name and address available so that you can send them notification. Your copyright does not have to be registered with the U.S. Copyright Office for you to take advantage of this DMCA provision."

http://rising.blackstar.com/how-to-s...wn-notice.html

Are you reading what I'm writing or only reading what you want to read?

And that lawyer is wrong... a "takedown notice" does not grant rights to private information that hasn't been legally signed over by the person or courts. It asks to remove content, which means if you sent it to the ISP, to comply they have to get the content removed or remove it directly.

As well, "take advantage" as the lawyer says, is a far cry from being "protected under it." Which again, swings both ways... such as, a non registered agent is not protected under DMCA, thus can be sued without notice.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

When did you ever mention granting rights to private information? why do you keep bringing more shit into this?

Oh, the lawyer must be wrong? :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

A photographer's image is protected by DMCA whether they register a copyright or not. You clearly don't know wtf you're talking about here, and I'm done discussing it.

Because requesting a persons information, name, address, etc without consent is a privacy violation. Sending a "takedown notice" does not grant that right, it's a notice to remove a copyright violation... period!

Yes he's wrong... but his focus was to point out that going through the ISP produces results when websites don't listen, so it really makes no difference if it's right or wrong.

Read the law, as I posted... stop making up your own versions or trying to translate a lawyers attempt to make a complex subject sound simple.

I'm out... vacation starts in 6 minutes.

There's a reason most of us don't even pay attention to him anymore. Arguing with him with the facts is futile. He's an expert in everything.

Fuck .xxx

Nail em

die or adapt.

You know what would work better.
Make a logo from "MC Affee" and say:

"We take care of your porn virus"
"Your Porn Protection"
"We look for porn all day"
"We scan all pornsites for you"

McAffee is $$$$$ company. Even didn't want their name in the press release cause it is porn.
How much negative comment will they take before they pull the plug?
And how much publicity would that get?

Maybe put a logo on all porn sites, we use McCoffee for save porn.
Or parody sites, McCoffee.com, for save porn surfing.

Just giving some ideas.

The rule of thirds. :2 cents:

http://myfilm.com/blogimage/guide.jpg