![]() |
Let us know when it passes..
|
Quote:
"dangerous precedent" too. :( Look...it's pretty cut and dried to me. If you didn't CREATE it, or pay to license it...then you STOLE it. And I think the "dangerous precedent" was set when the first thief on the internet figured out the "user uploaded" loophole to use DMCA against the very people it was designed to protect. The only "danger" I see about this particular piece of legislation is the "danger" that hard working people might actually stop having their work stolen and their livelihoods taken from them. |
Whether you like or dislike youtube ?I doubt that this proposed law if passed will close youtube down. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
you said you would rather see them in jail for 5 years. that deciding to WAIT for this law to pass RATHER then choosing to SUE. you might want to read your own statements. |
Quote:
vcr didn't create the content they timeshifted, they didn't licience it either but that not nor will it ever be stolen. i love how you want the monopoly without paying the cost |
Quote:
i said i would rather see them in jail , doesn't mean i said i wasn't going to sue.. I think this is a common problem with you gideon, you make shit up out of thin air to suit your purpose. |
Quote:
it should take long at all if as you claim the safe harbor is gone hell you should be able to get a summary judgement in your favor I personally believe your all talk, that "proof" your documenting isn't real |
Quote:
This isn't a court and you don't share any resemblance to a lawyer. Come back when you have passed the bar and are representing youtube, until then you are just a fart in the wind and you smell like shit.:thumbsup It took you 4 reply's just to grasp what was already said, i wish you luck in your future attempts pretending to be a lawyer :1orglaugh |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:00 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc