GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Hey dumb fucks, the jury found her not guilty so shut the fuck up (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1029292)

Joshua G 07-07-2011 10:16 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alprazolam (Post 18266489)
so you were there? you saw her kill the kid?
why didn't you testify?
exactly. shut the fuck up. you don't know, and that is called 'reasonable doubt'.
you cannot convict people if the evidence is not compelling enough to convict.
its amazing, after the fact, how militant people are about reasonable doubt. That loophole exists to protect the "innocent." Nothing about Caseys behavior was "innocent." Celebrating her daughters disappearance, avoiding her parents & cops, not testifying...she's as guilty as OJ. The jury chose to ignore 30 days of evidence pointing to 1 person just because nobody saw the crime.

Shit, the fucking defense was manslaughter...the kid drowned in the pool...but the jury couldnt even convict on that? That jury was a fucking joke.

SL|M! 07-07-2011 10:26 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by epitome (Post 18266345)
All it takes is 1 person out of 12 saying she is not guilty.

Doesn't mean she didn't do it.

People are entitled to their opinions, good or bad, wrong or right.
thats a hung jury not an acquittal.

sperbonzo 07-07-2011 10:26 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PR_Tom (Post 18266512)
The state has the MASSIVE advantage on evidence, they even get the last word with rebuttal and rebuttal closing arguments. They even leaked that there "was" a heart sticker RIGHT over the mouth on the duct tape. BUT they didnt leak that Cindy Anthony had said she thought she did the searches on the computer. Thats another HUGE advantage they had and used and still failed to prove their case. We KNOW from the trial there was no heart shaped sticker found. (and the residue disappeared?) Yet people still think for some reason that there was one! Why? People WANT to believe what they want to believe and so they do believe it.

People believe there was duct tape over her face. Why? Because duct tape was found near the skull? Was it even AROUND the skull? So should we believe Roy Kronk lifted the skull up and then set it back down and the tape never moved? And leading to that, should we think someone went to all the trouble to wrap the body in 3 bags and oh the heck with the head leave it out of the bags? I submit to you that the duct tape was sealing the bag, and Kronk removed it, and the head fell out when he lifted the bag, and the head landing on the duct tape. Whats more likely. But I admit I missed the part of the trial where they asked him if the tape was on the skull or not. And clearly I havent seen pictures. A lot of it still doesn't make sense. The prosecution says the water was deep and flowing enough to leave only silt in the skull, but that the hair was over the tape proves the tape was on before she decomposed? Water doesn't move hair? Just a mess.

Also for what it's worth, the word is that the initial jury vote when they began deliberations was 10 to 2. Only 2 people thought she was guilty initially and then came around to not guilty.
Good post Tom!


+1



.

Alprazolam 07-07-2011 10:29 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by joshgirls (Post 18266608)
its amazing, after the fact, how militant people are about reasonable doubt. That loophole exists to protect the "innocent." Nothing about Caseys behavior was "innocent." Celebrating her daughters disappearance, avoiding her parents & cops, not testifying...she's as guilty as OJ. The jury chose to ignore 30 days of evidence pointing to 1 person just because nobody saw the crime.

Shit, the fucking defense was manslaughter...the kid drowned in the pool...but the jury couldnt even convict on that? That jury was a fucking joke.
how would they convict her of manslaughter when she wasn't tried for manslaughter?
some of you are some real rocket scientists on how law works.

Alprazolam 07-07-2011 10:29 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by sperbonzo (Post 18266643)
Good post Tom!


+1



.
yes. good post. people are making comments with their emotions. they want a resolve to make themselves feel better.

Holly Lez! 07-07-2011 10:30 AM
You could always not read those threads..

marketsmart 07-07-2011 10:33 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alprazolam (Post 18266489)
so you were there? you saw her kill the kid?
why didn't you testify?
yes..

yes..

i was scared...






.

Joshua G 07-07-2011 10:36 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alprazolam (Post 18266649)
how would they convict her of manslaughter when she wasn't tried for manslaughter?
some of you are some real rocket scientists on how law works.
count #2 was aggrevated manslaughter. Quit talking like you have a clue. your embarassing yourself.

Alprazolam 07-07-2011 10:54 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by joshgirls (Post 18266670)
count #2 was aggrevated manslaughter. Quit talking like you have a clue. your embarassing yourself.
exactly moron. aggravated manslaughter, not manslaughter. i have many clues. the first is you are making emotional statements. thank god none of you idiots are jurors.

retards 07-07-2011 10:57 AM
yes everyones a lawyer

Joshua G 07-07-2011 11:19 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alprazolam (Post 18266722)
exactly moron. aggravated manslaughter, not manslaughter. i have many clues. the first is you are making emotional statements. thank god none of you idiots are jurors.
aggrevated...AKA she dumped the body instead of calling cops. That twice you've shown us your a retard.

Mr Petes Dad 07-07-2011 11:20 AM
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!dumb twats!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1


http://i.imgur.com/ZQF4Q.gif

Holly Lez! 07-07-2011 11:36 AM
Even the jurors who are now speaking are saying they wished the prosectutaion did a better job! “I just swear to God . . .” he said, his voice falling silent, overcome by tears. “I wish we had more evidence to put her away. I truly do . . .
http://www.therecord.com/news/world/...-anthony-juror

Joshua G 07-07-2011 11:50 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Holly Lez! (Post 18266862)
Even the jurors who are now speaking are saying they wished the prosectutaion did a better job! “I just swear to God . . .” he said, his voice falling silent, overcome by tears. “I wish we had more evidence to put her away. I truly do . . .
http://www.therecord.com/news/world/...-anthony-juror
i believe the CSI effect happened here. We are now at the point that a jury cannot convict without absolution. Caseys behavior could not possibly be more guilty. The juror is saying so. Shes know she did it, but didnt have the balls to convict because the CSI wasnt there. Pathetic.

I guess there is no god either because nobody can see him.

harvey 07-07-2011 12:18 PM
http://roflrazzi.files.wordpress.com...-francisco.jpg

epitome 07-07-2011 12:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SL|M! (Post 18266641)
thats a hung jury not an acquittal.
Yeah, I caught myself in another thread.

That came to me about an hour later. My bad.

And what I posted in that other thread is what Juror #3 has said, which is not guilty does not mean innocent.

epitome 07-07-2011 12:29 PM
Something I came across from a commentator:

“Providing the full quotes from juror #3 and especially the quote from the alternate reinforce the belief that these jurors did not understand legal requiremenhats. For example, "... [t]hey didn't show us how Caylee died. They didn't show us a motive." The prosecutiohan does not have to show "cause of death," they do have to show "manner of death," which they did through the medical examiner's testimony that the manner of death was homicide. If cause of death had to be proven in a murder trial then untold numbers of murderers would go free. Remember, the Scott Peterson case, where cause of death could not be determined due to deteriorathaion of the body because it had been in the water. In numerous murder trials cause of death cannot be determined because the body is skeletonizhaed, exposed to the elements too long, etc. The prosecutiohan is not legally required to provide a motive. For example, serial killers often have had no prior connection to their victims and most highly trained psychiatrihasts, psychologihasts cannot help to determine why (motive) they commit those type murders. Most jurors also do not understand the concept of "reasonablhae doubt" which requires that a person be capable of critical thinking, deductive reasoning and simultaneohausly capable of applying common sense. These are learned and/or innate skills that, sadly, many people do not possess. I would recommend that a standardizhaed test, that tests for these particular skills, be given all prospectivhae jurors especially in capital murder trials.”

marlboroack 07-07-2011 12:44 PM
Are we talking about the chick in VA who duct taped her daughters mouth and put heart stickers on it? Dude that was like a 1.5million dollar investigation. There is no fucking way in hell that she killed her own daughter after that kind of investigation. Don't you watch TV shows about this shit?

justinsain 07-07-2011 12:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheLegacy (Post 18266475)
Never heard that - is there a link? I have a problem with evidence such as this not being submitted since it proves without doubt - so have a hard time acknowledging that the judge etc. would simply throw it out as they have used security camera's from many locations to find and catch criminals. American's Most Wanted always shows it and I'm sure the criminals who got caught on tape can't say - "well the store didn't have my permission to film me when I shot the bastard outside in the parking lot".
Sorry for the confusion.

I made up that as an example to show how evidence that would help a jury make a decision is often excluded from evidence.
The public sees it but the jury doesn't there for the public has more evidence to form their opinion.

My fictitious example would have been a slam dunk for the prosecution.

In this trial some evidence was excluded and many times the jury was taken out of the room so the court could decide what would be admitted and what wouldn't.
We get to see ALL that but the jury doesn't.

The topic is how can the public have a different verdict than the jury and be the right one. I gave a fictitious example that related to this case.
Yes, I understand the court has the last word but that doesn't mean they always get it right in the true sense.

Tom_PM 07-07-2011 12:57 PM
Just because a juror commented that the prosecution didnt show a cause of death or motive doesnt mean those items in and of themselves would have made a difference, or that the juror thought they were required to.

I believe that juror was simply stating some of the issues they had that lead them to their verdict. I imagine if the comment was printed in full it would show that, but not sure. Just my guess.

V_RocKs 07-07-2011 02:29 PM
She is sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo.....







































not guilty!

DaddyHalbucks 07-07-2011 02:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alprazolam (Post 18265187)
emotional idiots. if there was evidence that she did it, it would have been guilty verdict.

are you all fucking retarded?
There were TONS of evidence, but the jury didn't want to see it.

Juries can be fickle.

Alprazolam 07-07-2011 02:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by joshgirls (Post 18266805)
aggrevated...AKA she dumped the body instead of calling cops. That twice you've shown us your a retard.
Did you mean: aggravated



sorry champ, only one moron here showing lack of intelligence, and apparently spelling.

double ownage. :1orglaugh

Alprazolam 07-07-2011 02:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Holly Lez! (Post 18266862)
Even the jurors who are now speaking are saying they wished the prosectutaion did a better job! ?I just swear to God . . .? he said, his voice falling silent, overcome by tears. ?I wish we had more evidence to put her away. I truly do . . .
http://www.therecord.com/news/world/...-anthony-juror
maybe they could just fabricate some and make everyone happy.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:21 PM.
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc