![]() |
Eisenhower did everything they say Reagan did
|
Quote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of..._Ronald_Reagan |
Ronald Reagan honoured with London statue
July 4, 2011 The private unveiling was a solemn occasion – yet it was Ronald Reagan's genius for affability that made him popular http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011...-london-statue |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Big difference between carpet bombing a village and going to war |
Quote:
Fuck You, here's a pic of the Ronald Reagan, my daughters ship You of course heard they received high honors for their humanitarian efforts in the Philippines? http://www.navy.mil/search/display.asp?story_id=38237 http://a6.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphot..._5457240_n.jpg |
Quote:
He has done almost the same thing as Reagan, has created almost the same pattern, but Obama is actually doing it faster, it took Reagan both terms to really turn it around. And he did it with total shit min wage jobs, where tech-edu jobs is on the up with Obama. As I said.... You don't know what Obama has really done. |
Quote:
you can find this with shit tons of presidents, the pope, kings, and wait for it..... Even dictators. Such amazing logic you presented here, grats on sucking up to one of the worst corportist presidents in history. |
this is interesting...
|
What's really funny here is that no one knows when the Taliban came into power. They surely didn't exist when Regan was in office.
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Son, the language is made up of groups of words to create new words and meanings... Taliban is two words combined together, in our use, it's a single word with a single meaning - we made the word mean "Islamist militia group" for the groups of Afghanistan war lords we're fighting - it's our word. "Since becoming a loanword in English, Taliban, besides a plural noun referring to the group, has also been used as a singular noun referring to an individual." I can read the wiki too, I just understand what I'm reading, jack ass. |
Quote:
But then you think that the cold war was coming to an end before Reagan took office, the warsaw pact didn't happen till 91. Oh and I love that you go on and on on how Obama stopped the it from getting worse, something that can't be proved, remember he said without the stimulus the unemployment rate would go as high as 8%, when the last time it was that good? |
Quote:
So sad, but once again not surprised at your lack of knowledge. |
Quote:
As I said, they are almost the same - IF - you would actually go look. I don't think anything, historians are the ones that think this, I simply repeated what they said. You thinking one man ended it or even started the end, proves this point over and over and over again. To continue on with the slaughter here.... Obama never said the rate wouldn't go above or below 8% (proof) or anything related to what you said. You, are taking a talking point that is complete bullshit and repeating it as fact, because you've never looked it up. What you're referring to is a "projection" in a report, not words... it comes from this - which also says, many reports say it will go as high as 11% - and it also says this isn't an easy thing to predict thus expect errors. You can start here to learn more about the stimulus... that did work, that many economics show that worked that also say not parts worked, exactly what Obama said as well. Again... you have no idea wtf Obama has done, or the results of what he has done, or truly... any factor outside of a talking point, educate yourself - stop being a sheep. |
Quote:
|
Reagan would be a democrat if he was just coming onto the scene in 2011. He's way way way left of even the moderate right (is there such a thing?)these days.
|
Quote:
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/hor...20Approval.jpg the projection is what Barry used to get the stimulus, I wanted the stmulus to be honest, it just didn't work because of bad leadership, it was suppose to get people back to work, it didn't, you can throw any graphs or economic forcasts all you want, but it was to address the unemployment rate which is still at 9.2%. For the economy to get better, people need to get back to work, be taxed, then the government will have enough money to work with again. Yeah it did a lot of things, just didn't do anything for the people out of work. |
Quote:
It did work -- plenty of economists back that. Bad leadership happened at the state level - good leadership is Obama yelling at the States for being stupid and adjusting it - that's what real leaders do. The entire bill was not suppose to get people back to work, only parts of it - and over time to ensure it was done correctly - hellooooo.... Then, much of it went to help States directly, not to create jobs but to save them, and without f'in question it did that.... and very well. Technically, it did help people out of work, greatly. What it didn't do is drop the unemployment rate another 3%.... yet. Given enough time, equal to say Reagan - maybe it will. |
Quote:
|
100 pointless arguments.
|
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_WKZIieKYe3...+and+obama.jpg
Looks like Reagan was even higher, looks like Reagan went up even longer, and it looks like Obama's numbers started to come down sooner. Odd, Obama stopped the increase, hit the peak sooner, and started the drop quicker. And yet - he's hated for his rate's which only need to drop 3%. WOW! |
Quote:
I think you need some help with graphs. I'm done here, you can't accept that the unemployment rate has been above 9% for way too long, that it's not moving, when it hit that high for Reagan, it started going down, learn to read a graph, I learned in grade school |
Quote:
You have no idea what States did to incorrectly manage any part of it, at any level, at all... and you have no idea what Obama did, guideline wise, before or after, or at any point. Quote:
I don't need read a graph to see you're a hypocrite.... I can just read your replies. |
|
Quote:
3% is about 4.5 million jobs, good luck with that! |
Quote:
you're crazy if you do... we will not see rates go down much lower than what they are today.. companies are making money, workers are more productive, offshore labor is reliable.. why hire... :2 cents: . |
Quote:
Before Obama came into office, we lost 4.5 million jobs, within his first year of him stopping the drop another roughly 4.5 million jobs were lost, for almost 9 million lost jobs. More than TWICE what Reagan had to deal with. Obama has FULLY countered his loss so far, meaning he has 100% RECOVERED EVERY job lost under his watch - and then added some. Obama, has ALREADY beat Reagan AND FDR's numbers growth numbers. By shit tons! He's done a BETTER job than Reagan at recovering jobs. So the other 4.5 million is ALL under Bush's watch, and NOW Obama is replacing those as well. So yeah, good luck Obama, you've already corrected the Jobs under your watch, MORE than Reagan did - and now you're unfucking the other Presidents losses. And you still... hate on him. It's sad and pathetic, and fucking so unAmerican it's not even funny. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
you would vote for her wouldn't you? the answer is yes, you would.. and that just shows that you cant get over the my side vs your side mentality that is killing this country.. :2 cents: . |
Quote:
How about you go look at the actual math, I wrote them above, you can look them up. You can't even admit the numbers have declined when you can visually see it, it's a plateau with you, hahahahaha... Something in your brain is very twisted, way fucked up, like bizarre. |
Quote:
. |
"Freedom prospers when religion is vibrant and the rule of law under God is acknowledged." ... Ronald Reagan |
Quote:
You keep bringing this up, I keep telling you the same thing, just because I don't like Obama, doesn't make me in love with the GOP, I'm not. Please get a clue to that |
Quote:
|
this is what actually kills the US right now - constant bickering over total bullshit instead of pulling your asses together and make things work - like at some point it has made you the greatest country on earth. from an outside point of view it's almost tragic to watch :2 cents:
|
Quote:
To the point where some people will argue for an administration that can't get the unemployment under 9% It isn't about what they have done, it's where they have failed. 9.2% after 2 1/2 years is a fail and no amount of excuses are going to change how I feel about this. |
Quote:
Even if Obama added 10 million jobs, you STILL would not give him credit, it would be a different excuse, different bullshit, to fuel your hate. In this thread I have posted proof, debunked your theories, shown where you were flat wrong with actual proof to back it, and you STILL wont admit shit. Truly... I've put you in the category of one of the most pathetic people I've ever encountered. |
Quote:
the tax cuts that were supposed to create new jobs didnt work either so you have less money from taxes AND no jobs but hey, i dont understand american politics anyways but i know that some drastic changes in my country about 10 years ago now paid out to 6.x% unemployement and 4% economic growth this year. and right in the middle of the economic crisis we had LUCKILY a coalition of the 2 biggest parties so that - in opposite of the US - both we able to work out a strategy that made this possible. maybe you could learn something from that... but wait, we're "socialistic"... so unfortunately this wont work either |
Ron was the man.
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:42 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc