LMAO, Go reread your posts. All you do is insult people, So I met some girls in chicago that were complaning about an older gentleman who was over weight degenerate trying to get them to Cam for "his" company. Wonder who that could be!! Check yourself Son!

So if he gets it under 9%, being that it's almost under, you're going to make a post praising Obama? How about if he gets it below 8, or 7 or 6? Will you at any point say "Obama" did it, like you blame it all him now, so clearly it would be 100% him if he recovered? What if he adds nothing but high-tech, better paying, more money moving jobs but less total - ie: more important jobs? P.S. this is what he's doing btw.

Of course not, I really don't need an answer from you.

There will not be now...or in the future...a President or a Congress that will return the Nation back to peak employment. Higher and higher unemployment will continue as the population grows and technology continues to advance.

It is being said that business/the wealthy are sitting on a trillion to three trillion dollars (depending who is producing the figures) and the Republicans are saying that if you reduce taxes even more they will begin hiring...and that is just bullshit.

Business/the wealthy are not in the business of hiring people...they are in the business of turning a profit...and reducing employment costs...combined with technology increases profits.

Also another way to increase profits is to reduce the cost of employment...reduce environmental requirements...and safety requirements. This has been ongoing and continues to be...by moving business to foreign countries.

The peak days of the Nation are over...they shall not return.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Pipe dream for them to work together, it happened under Clinton with Newt to overhaul welfare and even under Reagan, he worked with Tip Oneil for to raise the tax for Social Security

You've made two post, all to insult me, and the company I work for does business with the company you work for, you're not really bright are you?
Rather than deal with you, I'll place you where you belong on ignore, because you have nothing to offer!

I'll give you an answer, I'll admit his idea's worked when I see it go below 7.5% Isn't that the magic number, if he can do that with the admin he has in place, I'll be impressed

I'm sure that's been said before

If you worked for my company and said something like that to a customer. You would be joining the ranks of the unemployed.

Thank You

If you don't like how I feel about Reagan or Obama, thats fine, don't get nasty about it, if you think I'm the only one that thinks like this, you're wrong.

http://blogs.forbes.com/peterferrara...s-and-figures/

GFY is the embodiment of free speech and if you have a problem with that, GoFuckYourself

It has been said before...in various ways...by me.

That's what scares me, more than one person thinks like you on these subjects.

That article is such pure shit, it's got incorrect information we've already busted in this post, with actual proof/sources to back it up... it's not even worth covering its stupidity.

We all love free speech, but oddly it is a two way door, dishing it out also means listening twice, you do have two ears, two eyes, and only one mouth - you should try listening and observing the facts more so you don't stop on your own rights.