hottest one is the third out of the three. The chick with her legs spread behind her head is pretty nasty. The gore chick has been hit several times. Obviously with a baseball bat. It's a shame that this alt niche is not as popular as it was a few years ago.

Most of them really aren't that bad looking. They just make themselves look really weird.

There are better looking ones... these ones are alright :)

that first pic is my fave :thumbsup i bet she's a fun one in the sac :winkwink:

Awesome, just awesome, I love goth chicks. :thumbsup

yes, sure

no

[QUOTE]
http://gothicsluts.com/gc/m04sc/gothicsluts03.jpg[/QUOTE

Looks crazy on the picture so no. Is probably pretty cute.

Number 1: i'd hit it









Number 2: i'd hit it












Number 3: i'd hit it

I'd hit that bloody bitch

That second one freaks me out

Thanks :) Love Dexter!

I think I'm going to have that in shoot descriptions for models from now on -- seeking flexi skills, bloody horror, and witches :thumbsup

Yeah, with a bat. :disgust

She aint gettin near me lol

I love when models can do neat stuff like that. Whenever I've shot that girl, I've always been like, "Do the trick! Do the trick!" because she is so impressively flexible.

I couldn't even start to describe how absolutely wrong you are, then I recalled you were contacting Amelia disguising your identity or something like that and then bitching at her

So yeah, your opinion is something to keep in mind :Oh crap

in your niche, you rock.

i'd do 2 out of 3 - not into the blood thing. clean her up, I'd fuck her silly.

mind you, the bloody one will probably outsell the rest cause it's the freakiest....

You can take criticism like a child and cry or you can take it to improve what you are doing.

That is the reason an intelligent person would post work on a public forum, to test and learn.

All that work with the models, costumes make up and blood is wasted because it is shot like a family portrait at some hick photographers.

If you got a good location and use some interesting lighting, try some different lenses everything would come together into something special.

Buy hey, porn seems to pride itself on being crap, (in HD of course )

:1orglaugh I'd hose her down for you special.

Those girls looking kinky as hell

Interesting.

Great girls, great shots, great photography as usual Amelia.

You know, I once asked a local movie rental shop owner years ago as to how much of his income came out of the horror section. He told me a full 40% of his overall income came from it. Which tells me that a shit-ton of people love the genre, and a large % of the population always will.

People who say they don't get it or doubt the marketability of horror really are sadly misinformed.

Love goth girls... with big boobs. :)

I like dark girls, but this is not doin it for me. The photography is top notch.

It's "Goth", NOT "Gothic".

Two entirely different deals.

That's really interesting. I think that a lot of times, an independent store can really make bank on carrying the thing that tons of people like, but which tends to be underserved, like with horror. Every few years, the mainstream movie industry rediscovers horror and acts surprised all over again that it sells.

I know, during the zine revolution, the stores which carried all the really offbeat magazines, whether or not they were adult like mine, could afford to do it because they made so much with niche adult stuff that they just needed to fill out the store real estate to have something besides those. Needless to say, a lot of those stores were my bread and butter, but, oh, did I give back whenever I entered one, I loved all that stuff so much.

[QUOTE=CDSmith;18286696]Great girls, great shots, great photography as usual Amelia.

QUOTE]

Lets stop kiss arse and get serious, photography has a lot to offer....

Lets try adding a good background...

http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4117/...d3b2f86ded.jpg

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2605/...d986931056.jpg

Now lets do something about that lighting, bit more moody and dark....

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2287/...ded64955c9.jpg

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2072/...791e2c4d6d.jpg

How about changing the focal length of lenses...
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5023/...f9664cb785.jpg


It' called photography and I think it could add a lot to your work...

Hope that helps.

(All images from Flickr)

Thanks for the reminder. Going to poke my design folks on this. :thumbsup

Not my thing.

[QUOTE=Cherry7;18288144]wow, you're really something. First of all, I don't have to "kiss arse", Amelia isn't even a client (shame shame :Oh crap )nor do I know her personally, yet I consider myself smart enough to recognize something good when I see it. I work both in the marketing and design aspects with some of the darkest photographers, artsy goth, alt babes, you name it and that's a radically different market to what Amelia posted, let alone what YOU posted.

Amelia pics are perfect for the market she intends, where subjects are WAY MORE IMPORTANT than backgrounds and Photoshop. You, on the other side, posted: 2 extremely unappealing girls with ultra bland photography which have.... a wall (yeah, I'm sure Amelia can't afford a wall, she must live in a tent). Then a couple Photoshop tutorials and a extremely Photoshopped picture where the focal point is.... COLUMNS!!!!!! I mean, yeah, maybe for those that have a "columnophilia" fetish that photo must be really provocative, but for those looking for REAL people playing some kinks, then I'm sure Amelia's photos outsells your examples like 10000 to 1.

Plus, I'm pretty sure she likes to run businesses as a business rather than some museum of boring pictures and Photoshop tutorials. Every fucking teenage kid and girl have your kind of pics. "au contraire" to see Amelia pics, people has to pay.

But hey, don't let logic and common sense stop you :thumbsup

:laughing- :laughing- :laughing-

2nd pic is turning me off., yikes, blood

[QUOTE=harvey;18288733]
Ha, ha, thanks. That arrogant little boy Maxim Ford likes to spam webmasters pretending to be a fictional women named Cherry Chapman. He spammed like a zillion of my sites, and kept spamming them after I asked him repeatedly to stop. I think he still may not have figured out that I own all of those sites. His pitch was that everyone sucks but Cherry Chapman who is female, so I should totally promote him out of sisterhood and gratitude for his brilliance.

I have Maxim Ford on ignore, but your tent quip literally made me laugh out loud. Thanks for that.

Check me on this, but did that dude seriously post a bunch of totally dressed and kinda underage stuff as what he thinks people should strive for on adult membership sites, including a Harry Potter photochop?

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2287/...ded64955c9.jpg

Yes, indeed he did.

I've got around 13 years experience in promoting fetish online, digital photography, choosing models and what sells. I'm assuming you have even more in your niches of interest. And in looking back over the thread I see several who have years of experience in much of that as well, to the tune of a combined 50+ years of experience. Then you have this Cherry fellow with his Harry Potter and column girl pics.

So it's kind of hard to figure out who to believe. :D

:1orglaugh Tough call.

There is none so blind as those who will not see.


The difficulty of ignorance is that you don't know and don't see your lack of knowledge.

Look at any good photography website and see what good photography can add to a picture.

Spend all that time getting good models and making them look good to waste the effort with banal crap photography. Who is the fool here ?

Hire a good photographer and see the difference. Why because you are making porn does it have to be sub standard? Look at mainstream that is the standard product thats paid for should get.

PS Because of my other jobs I prefer to keep my real name off these boards. I have never pretended to be a woman. Just because you can do something does not mean you should. A person who posts a persons real name, after being told it could damage them and their family, is a cunt.