I do not recall even suggesting it was sexual abuse. As far as why, consider it a hunch based on exposure to many victims. Casey acts like one IMHO. I got the same impression with my limited exposure to Casey's mother. I suspect she is a victim as well.

I don't think the defense was much of an issue considering the lack of evidence produced by the prosecution. I think that was the sole reason we got the verdict we did. Lack of evidence will do that.

Im going to with the duct tape. the omitted truths. the month long wait. You say she mourns differently. But as the story goes she was just missing while she was out partying and fucking. the chloroform and decay in her trunk. the lousy mother yes helping her cover it up. the father disgusted with them all after a certain point. the body found near/on her grandmother's property.

Yes, to me, I call that proof. You call it all.. ? circumstantial ?

Just as you said. OJ was free due to lawyer pumping and judicial error. You saying thats impossible here? Lack of evidence? Ive seen more cunning cover ups on CSI :2 cents:

I completely agree with you, I'm glad our justice system worked this time.

The duct tape had DNA on it. The DNA ruled out Casey and Kaylee as the source. So, what evidence are you looking at?

You didn't suggest it was sexual abuse and I didn't say you did :)

However, the defense clearly stated she suffered physical, mental and sexual abuse in whole or part from her parents and her brother without offering a single piece of evidence to substantiate it other than the claims made by Baez.

It was really the backbone of their defense and all they had to do was create something without proving it. That's why I was saying if the system was reversed and she had to prove her innocence by proving she was sexually abused she couldn't have done it.

The abuse allegations were made to give a reason as to why she lied to police and throw suspicion on to her father. If the defense were not allowed to use the abuse allegations because they couldn't prove them, their house of cards would come tumbling down.

The really cool thing about our Constitution is that you do not have to prove your innocence.

ok.. if so. What about the rest?

still answer the question. Do you think she did it? yes or no.

In an ideal world. but yet thats what a lot of cases come down to isnt it?

Since you stand by the judicial system to the tee/tea/T ... what do you say to all the imprisoned innocent?

Unlike the GFY experts, I have not seen enough to think she did it. I thought I already suggested earlier that Casey's father is the subject of my suspicions.

Kill them all. Let God sort them out.

Casey's Dad?

seriously?

Do elaborate because I havent heard this angle.

she is not guilty. all you idiots relize what that means? your opinion does not matter.

she has also not said she is doing any interviews. because the media reports she "could" you idiots get all in a tizzy?

want to know what is wrong with america, read most of the idiots in this thread. you're all brainwashed fucks. the media tells you what to think. grow a brain.

most of you are so far up nancy graces cunt im wondering if you ever take a break for air?

I did my due diligence and came to the conclusion that I did on my own. I couldnt spot Nancy Grace out in a line up.

It's really wild how much it colored some people. There is some hearsay that her brother touched her boobs once while she was sleeping, she had mentioned it to past boyfriends and other inmates in the OC jail.

Other than that she said in a jail house letter that she had a nightmare while in jail and she wondered if her father might have also touched her tits while she was sleeping as well. When the cops got ahold of the jailhouse letters they wanted to investigate Casey's claims of abuse but Baez pulled the plug on it and told them not to bother, his client would not be cooperating.

How something goes from "I had a bad dream and i wonder if my dad touched my boobs like my brother did" to having her father's dick in her mouth at 8 years old a year later is pretty fucking remarkable, but whatever. :disgust

It should also be noted the FBI crime lab admitted they accidentally contaminated the tape when a member of their team handled it w/o gloves.


The DA dropped the ball by not painting a timeline of events for the date the child died ruling out George Anthony as a player when they presented their case and instead trying to sit on it for rebuttal.

Their plan was to let the defense put forth the details of the drowning in the defense's case and then blow the timeline apart in rebuttal.

Casey's cell phone records, George's cell phone records, as well as activity logs from the anthony's home confirm after George Anthony left for work on the 16th Casey returned to the house where she stayed until after 4pm.

The jury never heard it because outside of opening statements the defense never tried to present a theory or timeline of events. They never asked George Anthony if he found the child in the pool, they never asked him if he told Casey to hide the body or that they should try and cover it up rather than call 911. They just made innuendos and let the jury connect the dots in their own minds.

What I don't understand is why some people are more willing to connect the dots with the defense's theory when forming their personal opinion than the prosecution's when the prosecution had much more evidence to support it. I mean, what's the evidence that George was involved and the child drowned? :helpme