:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Did they ever figure out who killed Jon Benet? lol

All opinion aside, they definitely missed uncovering a big chunk of what happened with this case... maybe the truth will come out one day.

And people who harm and kill little children should be barbequed alive and left for the vultures.

Lot of unanswered questions in that case, not excluding why the grandparents did some of the things they did or didnt do as well as Casey. Was the ladder up or wasn't it? Was the gas can there or wasn't it? Was the tape on there or wasn't it? Did George smell something or didn't he? Did he call the cops and why not? Did mom do the searches or didnt she? Was she at work when she was clocked in or wasn't she?

Lee Anthony said his mom Cindy specifically said "I sent them down there to search" and she said she never ever told them to go search. Was it a lie or wasnt it? Do we really believe half of what mom said and a quarter of what dad said? How confident in a single word of their testimony are you? I'm at about zero.

The whole family was responsible and honestly I thought it was pretty obvious that they all knew more than they were saying, with the exception of Lee who seemed like he was the only one outside the loop of lies and was just pissed off about it.


I dont think they ever found who killed Jon Bennet but they did exclude the parents years afterwards as I recall. Even after the mom died. She lived out her life with people thinking she killed her own daughter.

Come on Baddog. I know your partial to the judicial system. For that you should also know that it can be flawed.

Say she didnt kill her kid. She still deserves punishment for how she handled herself.

Do I think she did it? yes. Do I care that she was not convicted, no!


Put court aside.

Duct tape. chloroform. trunk rot. month wait. body found at relatives.

Do you think she did it?

That's a great poster!
:thumbsup

It's kind of fucked up when killing / neglecting the disappearance of your kid turns out to be the best career choice.

lol, nice trolling.

Shall we put the lack of evidence aside as well? I have heard nothing that makes me think she is a murderer. A lifelong victim of abuse, probably. Lousy mother, probably. Mourns differently than you or I, definitely.

If you have some evidence that I missed, please feel free to present it. Just because Nancy Grace says she did it is not good enough for me. :2 cents:

Nancy Grace is NOT a fan of her's and she doesn't hold back when it comes to Tot Mom

What makes you think she was probably a lifelong victim of abuse?

It's an important part of the trial as the jury was led to believe the same thing.

I'd like to point out that absolutely no evidence to support the sexual abuse was presented at trial. No friend that Casey had confided in about the abuse came forward to testify. No police records of the abuse. No therapists treated her for sexual abuse. Casey didn't take the stand and testify to the abuse. There was absolutely no evidence to substantiate the sexual abuse allegations.

The sexual abuse allegations were made in graphic detail by her lawyer in his opening statement. He is the only one to make the claim and conveniently he enjoys impunity to anything he says in the courtroom.

Baez got up there and shocked everyone with his graphic allegations which were clearly meant to scar the image into the mind of the jury. From that point on the prosecutors had to work to get them back to reality but it was a huge up hill battle and in most respects the damage had been done by Baez's unsubstantiated sexual abuse allegations.

With that in his pocket he knew with the alleged affair witness he would be able to discredit the father and create reasonable doubt even though his claims were unsubstantiated.

As far as the grief goes, the defense brought up a witness that was an expert in grief and got her to testify that everyone grieves in different ways. What the expert DIDN'T do was actually examine Casey to see how she grieves. The expert even said she was unfamiliar with Casey Anthony and didn't know about her until she was called a few days before her testimony date to testify for the defense. I wonder what her opinion would have been if she were actually allowed to examine Casey before her testimony.

The sexual abuse allegation was a shrewd move by the defense that swayed many minds in favor of Casey. Not mine as there was absolutely no evidence presented to corroborate that statement and therefore I choose to exclude it when forming my opinion as to her guilt.

If you find the sexual allegations bogus and take it out of the trial I think it would take away most of the defense and we might have got a much different verdict.

I do not recall even suggesting it was sexual abuse. As far as why, consider it a hunch based on exposure to many victims. Casey acts like one IMHO. I got the same impression with my limited exposure to Casey's mother. I suspect she is a victim as well.

I don't think the defense was much of an issue considering the lack of evidence produced by the prosecution. I think that was the sole reason we got the verdict we did. Lack of evidence will do that.

Im going to with the duct tape. the omitted truths. the month long wait. You say she mourns differently. But as the story goes she was just missing while she was out partying and fucking. the chloroform and decay in her trunk. the lousy mother yes helping her cover it up. the father disgusted with them all after a certain point. the body found near/on her grandmother's property.

Yes, to me, I call that proof. You call it all.. ? circumstantial ?

Just as you said. OJ was free due to lawyer pumping and judicial error. You saying thats impossible here? Lack of evidence? Ive seen more cunning cover ups on CSI :2 cents:

I completely agree with you, I'm glad our justice system worked this time.

The duct tape had DNA on it. The DNA ruled out Casey and Kaylee as the source. So, what evidence are you looking at?

You didn't suggest it was sexual abuse and I didn't say you did :)

However, the defense clearly stated she suffered physical, mental and sexual abuse in whole or part from her parents and her brother without offering a single piece of evidence to substantiate it other than the claims made by Baez.

It was really the backbone of their defense and all they had to do was create something without proving it. That's why I was saying if the system was reversed and she had to prove her innocence by proving she was sexually abused she couldn't have done it.

The abuse allegations were made to give a reason as to why she lied to police and throw suspicion on to her father. If the defense were not allowed to use the abuse allegations because they couldn't prove them, their house of cards would come tumbling down.

The really cool thing about our Constitution is that you do not have to prove your innocence.

ok.. if so. What about the rest?

still answer the question. Do you think she did it? yes or no.

In an ideal world. but yet thats what a lot of cases come down to isnt it?

Since you stand by the judicial system to the tee/tea/T ... what do you say to all the imprisoned innocent?

Unlike the GFY experts, I have not seen enough to think she did it. I thought I already suggested earlier that Casey's father is the subject of my suspicions.

Kill them all. Let God sort them out.

Casey's Dad?

seriously?

Do elaborate because I havent heard this angle.

she is not guilty. all you idiots relize what that means? your opinion does not matter.

she has also not said she is doing any interviews. because the media reports she "could" you idiots get all in a tizzy?

want to know what is wrong with america, read most of the idiots in this thread. you're all brainwashed fucks. the media tells you what to think. grow a brain.

most of you are so far up nancy graces cunt im wondering if you ever take a break for air?

I did my due diligence and came to the conclusion that I did on my own. I couldnt spot Nancy Grace out in a line up.

It's really wild how much it colored some people. There is some hearsay that her brother touched her boobs once while she was sleeping, she had mentioned it to past boyfriends and other inmates in the OC jail.

Other than that she said in a jail house letter that she had a nightmare while in jail and she wondered if her father might have also touched her tits while she was sleeping as well. When the cops got ahold of the jailhouse letters they wanted to investigate Casey's claims of abuse but Baez pulled the plug on it and told them not to bother, his client would not be cooperating.

How something goes from "I had a bad dream and i wonder if my dad touched my boobs like my brother did" to having her father's dick in her mouth at 8 years old a year later is pretty fucking remarkable, but whatever. :disgust

It should also be noted the FBI crime lab admitted they accidentally contaminated the tape when a member of their team handled it w/o gloves.


The DA dropped the ball by not painting a timeline of events for the date the child died ruling out George Anthony as a player when they presented their case and instead trying to sit on it for rebuttal.

Their plan was to let the defense put forth the details of the drowning in the defense's case and then blow the timeline apart in rebuttal.

Casey's cell phone records, George's cell phone records, as well as activity logs from the anthony's home confirm after George Anthony left for work on the 16th Casey returned to the house where she stayed until after 4pm.

The jury never heard it because outside of opening statements the defense never tried to present a theory or timeline of events. They never asked George Anthony if he found the child in the pool, they never asked him if he told Casey to hide the body or that they should try and cover it up rather than call 911. They just made innuendos and let the jury connect the dots in their own minds.

What I don't understand is why some people are more willing to connect the dots with the defense's theory when forming their personal opinion than the prosecution's when the prosecution had much more evidence to support it. I mean, what's the evidence that George was involved and the child drowned? :helpme