this article is written by a man who profits everytime the court farts towards prosecuting any pornography, as his client for 7 years, he seems to be an excellent attorney and the best on these topics, but quite an alarmist. Can't tell you how many 1000's of dollars I wasted on the Ashcroft years with all his 2257 research being billed across his clients.

bullshit, and if he was it won't fly in court..

that's good to know. Again, one of the reasons I brought up the thread, to get feedback from you all. See what you all think about it :)

Yeah, now that I posted that I feel bad, but from his perspective Larry has to look at it like down the road his clients might be brought up on charges and this pedo case now has precedents the prosecutors can use against his clients.


Also you can be brought up on charges for CP even with legal verified porn, lucky for this shmuck the girl shows up to prove her age for her fan, but how many other pornstars or one off amateurs would do this?:

http://www.examiner.com/sex-relation...orn-possession

Exactly what I thought when I first hit the page and saw the author, but ya never know with the US government.

The article did mention the film "American Beauty" so I think it's safe to assume that even in jest, movie's like "Not Another Teen.." won't escape censorship. But whether that's before or after they crack down on the adult industry first (and harder) remains to be seen.

Dont want to sell it just yet anyway , was just messing about, but thanks for the offer

My thoughts went down that same road. When I was still stripping I did pony- and pigtails by request as I was lucky enough to not look -quite- my age. We gave out 'schwag' to our regulars, for lack of a better word, which included photos, some just of us posing together or onstage, some WITH said gentlemen customers.

According to this, without 'artistic' merit, those token gifts would be prosecutable as depiction CP? That's so thought policey :(

If people are going to get convicted based upon a fantasy outlet for their fetishes as if they're actually going out and raping kids, which this vague and badly written law allows for between illegitimizing 'depictions' and making 'receiving' this material illegal, then they're probably going to go out and rape some kids.:2 cents:

Take care.

Little Lupe's website is still online so fuck all the fearmongering and lets get down to business and make some money.

Do I need to repeat that the defendant filmed himself raping an eleven year old girl? A fifth grader. This has nothing to do with the word "teen". It has everything to do with the fact that the judge wasn't going to let the guy walk after he repeatedly molested an elementary school kid. It's not precedent, it's repeated rape of a fifth grader. Geez.

Fiddy illegalities!

I am still not sure what I am supposed to do now, I guess to be sure.. I will review my teen webcam blog and remove all "questionable" content... maybe that means displaying only teen girls that look older WITH underwear WITHOUT pigtails... to be honest I am little bit lost here....