Yea, I saw the gallery, that does for sure give an edge. :thumbsup

Feel free to use any of those pics for promotion that you want.

Update: the gallery I submitted on 8-17 got accepted today so about 2 weeks acceptance time it seems, will let everyone know if I make any sales.

Yeah, was going to say it took mine about 2 weeks, and that was over a year ago.

I had a gallery approved this month.... image gallery that burned through 32 gigs of bandwidth in 4 days and not one sale.

08 Aug 2011 29,224 31,225 796,159 22.09 GB
09 Aug 2011 7,502 7,872 200,777 5.58 GB
10 Aug 2011 2,958 3,079 77,817 2.17 GB
11 Aug 2011 3,287 3,659 90,787 2.76 GB

Not faulting the Hun at all - need something more hardcore next time.

I just signed up, but wanted to promote your sites for awhile. Hopefully we can work something out and make some money. I don't currently work in your niches really, but have in the past and did well.

I will hit you up soon Robbie.

the hun rocks. , takes 1 month to get listed.. one of the only sites I bother submitting in this current adult business model.. there are about 5-7 sites only that are worth your time submitting right now.. and thehun is one of them..

it sends sales..

not like tube sites, where you can submit to 100, waste 1 full day and get 0 sales..

tubes sites send 0 sales.

thehun sends between 2 and 5 sales per gallery.. you can even get sales from the archives, after months of being listed, so don't worry if you dont get a sale in those 3-4 days they list you...

the most sales I got in thehun tho, was in year 2005, with 22 sales with one gallery.. always talking about free listings of course.

but getting even 1 sale in today's adult business with a free listing, is more than AMAZING as Far As we Are all concerned...

oh, and about niches. I promote a variety of niche paysites.. yes, paysites... I AVOID webcams or dating, they do not convert.. or maybe im missing something, but tried to make webcams+dating work for almost 2 years with no luck at all, sent plenty of traffic, talking about millions of uniques and their shitty ratio of all those progs just bothered me.. anyway im always open if some programs cares to explain exactly how the hell to convert cams... and I will join and send the traffic.

Yeah cams do not convert for me either, I had them on a ton of blogs and didn't make shit from them. I appreciate the info on the hun! Are there any more sites worth submitting galleries to? I'm a newbie when it comes to galleries, mostly just do blogs but I figure in between posting to my blogs I could make a gallery or two.

Just approved your affiliate account. Thanks for signing up.

Well, I got 1 sale being listed on the hun so far which I'm fine with, that's $35 for just making a quick gallery so I can't complain! My blog also received a good amount of traffic and I'm going to try some different sponsors out and see which one works best.

Fitty submissions to the Hun

32 gigs over four days is nothing. As has been mentioned in this thread already; if you're paying that much for bandwidth (even on shared) - get a new plan.

Seeing as how The Hun (and AL4A) pretty well launched my adult "career" way back in '98, I think I'll fire up a few galleries and see what happens.

And I'll host the galleries on my $85 a year Amerinoc virtual account.

That will work fine. At least if you are doing pic galleries. I have had many Hun listings on amerinoc virtuals and have never had a problem.

2 pAGEs yeeeaahh

Congrats to you. Great signups.

Not only that...but over the last year I've started seeing that picture galleries are making more sales than movie galleries.

The reason? Well...up until the last couple of years, movie galleries were awesome. But now with tube sites having thousands of full scenes...they just pale in comparison and people don't even care for them anymore.

The result has been a renaissance for picture galleries. :)

I personally enjoy picture galleries because you get a glimpse as to what the whole "scene" is about. On tubes you get those micro-screen shots, which are okay, but usually don't give a great representation of what you might see. Same thing with movie galleries... although with movie galleries, the creator can select 3-4 higher quality images to represent the scene.

I understand the appeal of tubes to surfers certainly, but for previews and scanning, I definitely prefer a gallery-based format.