Originally Posted by TheSquealer (Post 18433445)

This guy is like a 1800's texas cowboy arguing with Enzo Ferrari about why horses are better than cars and how cars ruined the world. I can never really decide if it's really funny or just really sad. Usually it's a bit of both.

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 18431049)

So do I. But the positive outlook needs to be realistic.

Clearly online porn is suffering. I'm positive enough to see a way out. It seems all the gurus and experts aren't.

For me the way to a better future relies totally on utilising the benefits of an Internet delivered product rather than copying the same offline did in terms of the product. Which was stack product on a shelf in the hope someone would buy it. Online stacked product in a site and gave it away as boxes and hoped someone would buy it.

I''m far to positive to think that's right today or the only way.

The Internet can do one thing offline porn can't do. We do it in a few limited and usually expensive ways. Not enough ways and not really utilised it's possibilities. The Internet porn site can supply live contact to it's members.

so instead of a member signing up and just seeing a pile of porn scenes, he meets a real girl or guy for Gay sites. She chats with the members, helps him through the site and is there to chat all the time.

Cost after technology is supplied $2,000 per month per girl. That's probably over the top for a girl not getting her kit off. It would need 4.5 girls to supply 24/30 day coverage of girls working 40 hours a week, 120 hours a month. Total wage is $9000.

Divide that by a site with 1,000 members and it's obviously too expensive. Divide it by 10,000 members and it's 90 cents a month.

If online porn is now a collection of small sites with 1,000 to 2,000 members then it's not the picture given here by many. If it's sites with 5,000 plus then it's affordable. For a sponsor with a lot of sites doing well it's very possible.

Now look at the other benefits. What would you rather sign up to a site which is just a pile of porn, 100,000 of them to choose from, or a site with a live girl online to meet. Same goes for affiliates, would you take a little less to get a site that converts and retains better?

Live instant contact is all online paysite has to offer. Boxed porn is dying slowly, it's free on Tubes and piracy sites. To stay in a declining business and not changing is negative a defeatist. And won't take you to any long term success.

Now the question is does anyone have the balls and the money to make it work?

Or only can hide their inability with insults?

Originally Posted by TheSquealer (Post 18433445)

This guy is like a 1800's texas cowboy arguing with Enzo Ferrari about why horses are better than cars and how cars ruined the world. I can never really decide if it's really funny or just really sad. Usually it's a bit of both.

Originally Posted by gideongallery (Post 18434618)

you do realize your just copying the chat site model right

they pay less to affiliates in commission too

wow you discovered what every one knew years ago.

Originally Posted by TheSquealer

This guy is like a 1800's texas cowboy arguing with Enzo Ferrari about why horses are better than cars and how cars ruined the world. I can never really decide if it's really funny or just really sad. Usually it's a bit of both.

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 18434693)

You're assuming Online porn has taken porn forward like the car took transport forward.

That's the stupidest assumption ever.

The stupid part is, you still have to pay for a car to enjoy one, people no longer have to pay for porn to enjoy it.

Originally Posted by ottopottomouse (Post 18419446)

Should hire yourself out reading bedtime stories to kids that refuse to go to sleep.

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 18430077)

So who was this about?

"The only difference is he has an excuse to be delusional due to his age."

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 18434693)

No I'm adapting the chat model to fit the paysite one.

The object of a girl on a chat site is to get a single customer, at a time, into a higher priced 1-1 chat and show.

This is to keep 1,000s of surfers converting and rebilling by giving them something above what they currently get. The object isn't for the girl to get viewers to spend money, they have already spent money by joining the site. It's to chat with them, keep them happy and learn more about what they like and don't like. We do very little of that above comments below a scene. How is that better than comments to a real live person?

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 18434895)

Just realised why GG doesn't like my idea, hard to steal live stuff.

Silly me, I'm getting slower. :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Originally Posted by TheSquealer (Post 18434981)

As usual, the simplest of analogies are completely lost on you. It's not about the horse or the car, its about the pathetic old man that's totally lost in an ever changing world which he clearly no longer understands.