![]() |
Quote:
Fortunately many of the people you keep attempting to falsely denigrate as failures have continued buying my services and earning a nice income. So have many people you would agree are successful. In fairness, you do have a very exceptional boss. Nobody I know has ever denied that. I do wonder if Warren Buffet's ego is bruised by your 'insults', I don't know anyone in the adult community who takes them seriously... but he may not know that. :1orglaugh |
Quote:
what was your last job before adult? :1orglaugh |
Your pathetic attempts to derail a thread and make it 'about me' always fail. As I've told you countless times in other threads, I don't discuss my personal life on porn boards. My prior 'careers' are numerous and I am quite happy with their outcomes, some still have ongoing benefits years after I shelved them. They are also no more relevant to the current thread than your experience as a roofer. I never understand how being a roofer was an insult either. /shrug
|
Quote:
He has been in the adult online business making good money since the 1990's right? So when he was a young man he worked as a roofer? Is that the story? And if so...what does it matter what people did for honest work when they first jumped out in the world? Inquiring minds want to know! :) Is the "roofer" story simply from a long ago troll and it caught on and became an urban myth of GFY? Or was 12Clicks once an actual guy on a roof with hammer and nails at one point 20 years ago? |
Exactly Robbie,
How is it an insult that he was or is a roofer? That never made sense to me. I'm sure Warren Buffet had a 'job' before he had a career as well. One of the wealthiest men I have ever known worked at a car wash as a teenager... that doesn't make him a squeegee guy in his forties or fifties :1orglaugh |
Quote:
Anyway, enjoy fantasy land. I'd not take the only thing you had away from you.:1orglaugh |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I don't understand why guys pretending to have a business out of their mom's house make fun of it either. I've been a successful business owner in vastly different fields for over 25 years. I've made more money in either one than most trolls will in a life time. I guess its jealously.:winkwink: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Is that bad... no, unless you're 12clicks mr. construction worker that ditches on everyone else for shit jobs while pretending everything ever earned was done through porn.... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Then that makes posts calling you a "roofer" look like they are trying to imply that you are nothing more than a laborer who somehow got lucky? And the implication is done by calling you a "roofer" instead of the truth that you ran the company? Typical GFY lol I love this board. :) heh-heh |
Quote:
It seems to be the M.O. of trolls exiting the business to take shots at their betters on the way out the door. remember snake doctor? :1orglaugh |
Quote:
What would be really funny is if he ran a union shop. :1orglaugh |
Quote:
you seem to want to be noticed. |
Quote:
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_BXhnLPkFws...snap-46624.png Now I sell portable unicycles to the Chinese... http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_FhpSSA3y2U...onda-cycle.jpg |
Quote:
I just like to rag his ass... poke a few times and watch his replies... come on, he thinks having a smart kick ass educated wife that f'in kills it is an insult, that shit is funny man. She produces more sales than he ever has, and he brings her up to insult me... :1orglaugh |
Quote:
Back to our discussion... Everyone reaps the benefits in various ways. I can't really think of any ways that a poor person gets more. Why is it unfair? It's a scale that is equal... using b.s. numbers here, your first $20k is taxed (and refunded) exactly the same as everyone, exactly like the poor person. Even if you made 10 billion, your first $20k is a gimme. It makes no difference how we do it, 5% tax, 15% tax, zero fed spending and 1% tax, the super rich will from now on will pay the majority of the tax. That is something that is impossible to avoid, even if we taxed the poor more than the rich and did no refunds, the top 50% would still pay the majority of the taxes. The top 50% truly has that much more money than the bottom 50%. Coming back around... I 100% agree we need to cut spending way back, all over... THEN figure out this tax and debt crap. Even if that was done, the super rich will still continue to pay simply because they continue to consume the wealth. Maybe we would all pay less, maybe some could earn more, either way they will always pay the majority unless they're basically taxed to death, making them spend and invest - to avoid the tax. Which I'm not suggesting, but that is what happened in the past, and in did do that. |
Quote:
really? like who? hahaha, the imaginary world of the house wife can be a strange thing. |
Quote:
you have a million dollar machine that puts 2 people to work, yet someone could invest a million into a pizza parlor chain that gives 50+ people work.... one makes a lot more sense in achieving our current goals then the other. they should give cuts to sectors that have the easiest path to job creation, manufacturing isn't one of those. if they want to help manufacturing, they should increase tariffs on imported goods, thus making it more cost effective to manufacture inside our own borders. |
Quote:
everyone gets a 15% wack, regardless of how they got it, or how much of it they got. |
Quote:
edit: ps.in 2 weeks we have another welding robot arriving. Even though it is completely automated process, there will be 3 new hires to keep it fed with parts. When the recession hit, manufacturing did not get a bailout. We were on our own..sink or swim. |
Quote:
What the hell you need employees for? You never update your shitty sites nor you have any real affiliates. I have yet to see a single person that promotes your program and yes, I bought membership to your site. 10 old DVDs chopped up with 350 MB files. Brazzers are betters, pimproll are betters. You are a joke. |
Manufacturing is no more or less important than any other sector, however the advantage of manufacturing is that it can impact trade.
50 pizza shop may hire 200 people but all of them get paid by Americans and the customers are all Americans, while many of the ingredients may well be imported. You can't send pizzas to other countries. On the other hand, if we manufacture a widget, the same dollars may only result in 5 jobs rather than 200, but when we sell a widget to a foreign customer we bring in revenue and expand our economy. In the last 20 years the vast majority of our consumer exports have been increasingly digital. Movies, software, games, etc... Blizzard may only have a few hundred well-paid employees but they also bring a boatload of cash in from other countries. As you know, digital products are now pirated and stolen at an absurd rate. Our government is unaware, unable and disinterested in actually protecting digital manufacturers. That makes manufcture of physical goods even more important to our international trade balance. We ought to be doing much better analysis of our spending. Any sharp webmaster puts more effort into tracking his $/click than our government puts into tracking huge expenditures. Bill Gates did a very worthwhil TED lecture on th lack of monetary tracking by our government. The spending side of the equation ought to have it's own thread, and I assure you manufacture of physical good warrants more investment than many ventures that would create a greater number of short term jobs. The jobs problem won't be fixed by investment. Stimulus is not going to fix unemployment, it may prevent a depression and spur a recovery but it won't fix the fundamental long term problem. We simply do not have enough work for everyone who is willing and able to work. That problem will get worse over time. Businesses are growing more efficient at an insane pace. Only a decade or two ago people used to mail letters or send a fax. Nobody had a cell phone. You needed a secretarial pool. A computer spreadsheet was magic to most people. Payroll departments existed before ADP. Technology builds on itself and gains momentum exponentially. Does anyone really think in 100 years we will have jobs requiring all capable workers in a society of 300+ million? The jobs issue will only be fixed with fundamental changes like 4 day work week, free (yes entirely free) minimal housing, food, transport and utilities for non-workers. The start of it will likely be large tax incentives for families where one spouse stays home to raise their kids. They will sell it as restoring the American family but in reality it will be a way of paying people not to compete for jobs. We pay people based on production because there has always been demand for production. In many sectors that demand is already dying, gmail replaces most of the postal service.... When production is no longer in demand our method of assigning value can not continue to be solely based on employment payrolls. |
Interesting that you mention trade. 2011 has been very interesting. We've increased international shipments by nearly 400%. Our largest customer in the metals division is the Federal Government of Vietnam. This was also the first year we've sold more to China than we bought.
|
Quote:
As soon as we have limitless clean power readily available for free and in immediate supply, physical manufacturing will become obsolete as well. They used to promise innovation and science would lead to a higher standard of living and less work for everyone. So far we are perverting the productivity enhancements to amp up production rather than get more done with less work. Eventually getting more done just won't be helpful... and we will have to work less, like it or not. If you haven't seen it minte, watch the bill gates TED lecture on governments tracking spending. He really is a fairly bright guy heh. Also, the iPad TED app is brilliant - though it too has undoubtedly put a lot of lesser lecturers out of work as well. ;) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
This is the game. They get the rich to bitch at the poor and vice versa. The truth is everyone gets raped by taxes some just more than others. We are not only double, but triple and quadruple taxed. Every cent you earn is taxed, then when you go to spend you are taxed again with a sales tax, don't forget most states will tax your income again, so you get fucked on the federal and state level, when you go to invest you are taxed again, go to buy a house you are taxed again, want to drive a car pay taxes to gas it up. And if they don't get you on the taxes they will get you with registration and filing fees for everything you can imagine.
Medicare and social security are the biggest fucking ponzi schemes in the history of the world. You pay into these social programs your whole life then the politicians dip their greedy little fingers in any time they want to fund one of their buddies no bid contracts then 20 years later say oh there is no money in there time to make some cuts, sorry old timer. |
Quote:
You might be a pretty good painter or sculptor if you put your mind to it. When work becomes obsolete Art takes its place. The other alternative is a MASSIVE change in our technology level like space travel. But if we keep going on the current path at the current pace, work will dry up for many people in the next 100 years and 30 or 40 percent unemployment will be unavoidable. It just doesn't take that many people to put food on the table anymore.:2 cents: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
We aren far off from being able to make our hobbies our focus rather than making funding our hobbies our focus. At the end of the day it's all about distracting ourselves from the fact we are all going to die and nit be remembered more than a hundred years or two hundred max after we keel over. I'm confident we would all be able find new distractions. ;) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
As stated earlier in the thread, owning your own lambo will likely remain a luxury people have to work for... but using the subways and trains, wifi, nutritious (non-gourmet) food and a basic home suitable to the number of occupants will likely be as free as 'going to the park' is presently. When work only represents gaining upgrades, rather than necessities many people will opt out. Thinking of the unemployed as shiftless lazy leeches has to stop. For example, there is very strong evidence that children do better when their parents are directly involved in their day to day development. Many families can't afford to have one parent stay home. That will change quickly when society doesn't have a job for both of them to go to even if they want one. Yes, some people are lazy and incompetent, others simply see work as a way to fund their non-work time rather than a way to enjoy their time. They are lucky to be born in this era or the next era rather than to be born in the 1600s or 1400s when that meant quick starvation. |
12Clicks, Minte and Relentless should start posting in my threads so I can get mad views :pimp
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
What's up? Why so busy :pimp |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:49 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc