GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Move over Little Lupe, is this the tiniest teen online? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1039025)

CyberHustler 09-22-2011 10:36 AM

At least Little Lupe is attractive tho... This girl looks like a random crackhead.

CyberHustler 09-22-2011 10:39 AM

And stop knocking the hustle... if it's legal it's legal. We all know who their target audience is, I'd rather have that audience pull out plastic cards for a legal site that caters to their fetish than to go out and about looking for my little sister or your daughter. It is what it is.

Harmon 09-22-2011 10:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberHustler (Post 18444246)
And stop knocking the hustle... if it's legal it's legal. We all know who their target audience is, I'd rather have that audience pull out plastic cards for a legal site that caters to their fetish than to go out and about looking for my little sister or your daughter. It is what it is.

...Speaks volumes....

NetHorse 09-22-2011 10:44 AM

I'm scared to even click on the link, forget about promoting it. Geez.

Spunky 09-22-2011 11:02 AM

I think she needs to fatten up a bit

media 09-22-2011 11:06 AM

She looks half way retarded.. Some kinda deformity like dwarfism or something.. For sure not my cup of tea..

Coup 09-22-2011 11:06 AM


ShellyCrash 09-22-2011 11:06 AM

Damn, just by looking at that site I feel like I just put myself on some kind of list.

Quote:

Originally Posted by jscott (Post 18443533)
She's a lot older than you guys think

I certainly hope so. I see some 200_ dates on those watermarks.

http://www.angiecutie.com/i/candid-teen.jpg

She looks young, but she's clearly made to look younger in pink satin dresses and even a bib and a binky. As long as she's of age and legal they can do as they please. Personally I find it to fall below my taste level but I don't think it should be outlawed.

If you don't like it, don't promote it. :2 cents:

ShellyCrash 09-22-2011 11:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gleem (Post 18443865)
Good god she looks young. I'm sure it'll make a shit ton of cash, I won't touch it though.

This :2 cents:

Rochard 09-22-2011 11:13 AM

Sorry, I don't see myself promoting this any time soon.

helterskelter808 09-22-2011 11:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scott McD (Post 18444208)
But it is still legal, so.............

Before laws were made against CP it was still legal. So.....?

Quote:

16 is legal here, so do you think we should feel guilty about banging a 16yo because even though it's legal here, it's illegal elsewhere ?
The age of consent is different to laws to do with pornography (leaving aside the fact she looks about 12 or younger in some of those pics, not 16 or 18).

For example, it's no longer "legal" for 16 year olds to appear in porn in the UK or other Euro countries, because those countries have changed their laws to fall in line with the US law of 18+. The reason for that, aside from possible US pressure, was probably to protect people under 16, who producers could claim were over 16. Less easy to claim a 14 year old is 18 than 16, right?

I also think the UK may be one of those countries with very strict rules against CP, where someone only has to "look" underage for there to be a prosecution. So regardless of whether they are "legal" in the US, they are not legal elsewhere.

Dirty F 09-22-2011 11:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ShellyCrash (Post 18444319)
Damn, just by looking at that site I feel like I just put myself on some kind of list.



I certainly hope so. I see some 200_ dates on those watermarks.

http://www.angiecutie.com/i/candid-teen.jpg

She looks young, but she's clearly made to look younger in pink satin dresses and even a bib and a binky. As long as she's of age and legal they can do as they please. Personally I find it to fall below my taste level but I don't think it should be outlawed.

If you don't like it, don't promote it. :2 cents:

The fuck? Is that from that site? I was afraid to click it and now i know why.

Ayla_SquareTurtle 09-22-2011 12:24 PM

1) She's 25 if she's a day. The body is what throws you off

2) Dunno if she's anorexic, but she is unhealthily skinny to the point that I'd lay money she doesn't menstruate

3) Whoever made her wear that godawful dime store lingerie set should be slapped

cordoba 09-22-2011 12:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by porno jew (Post 18443986)
fuck that shit. like little old ladies wont send off emails to the fbi after seeing that on a site.

just remember in a lot of countries if it looks underage it IS illegal.

I think probably in a majority of countries those photos would be classified as virtual child pornography.

And remember that Europe now defines posession of cp as simply viewing an illegal image in your browser. And very shortly the EU is going to introduce minimum 3 year prison sentances for possession (including viewing) of cp.

In other words, to all the European webmasters here, who perhaps make up close to half of the board members - if the police ever take a look at your harddrive, you will be going down for three years as a paedophile as a result of viewing this thread.

These laws are beyond crazy, but perhaps gfy should keep in mind that they are the reality in Europe and other places.

woj 09-22-2011 12:52 PM

I'm clearing my browser cache just in case...:thumbsup

Eyeball 09-22-2011 12:58 PM

If they offer hosted FLV's the majority of gfy will start backtracking.

cordoba 09-22-2011 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by helterskelter808 (Post 18444195)
These pics are shocking and sickening enough, but some of the responses are un-fucking-believable.

At one time there were no laws against real CP, ie it was legal. So does anyone here want to stand up and defend or make excuses for that? That things just become 'wrong' when the law catches up with prohibiting them?

Anyone who defends this because it's "legal" (when in fact many people, just by viewing this thread, have broken their own country's law and could end up in jail) or who 'doesn't see any issue', or in any other way make excuses for this kind of shit should really step back for a moment and examine how far gone in the mind they are.

The admins could also perhaps consider removing the images, on behalf of those readers of this site/thread in locations where such images are probably not actually "legal".

The only point at issue is that even viewing these images is illegal in many of the countries in which board members are living - even if the titties (or lack thereof) are obscured.

From a moral perspective, the main issue should be whether these type of images lead to or reduce real offending. I remember reading recently that such a study was performed and it was found that virtual cp reduced the rate of real offending. I think the truly sick fucks are those who would prefer real children being abused over allowing adults to fantasise in their own minds about whatever they want to.

shimmy2 09-22-2011 01:05 PM

primordial dwarfism is what i think its called

thickcash_amo 09-22-2011 01:16 PM

definitely not my taste. I like my girls looking of age, being of age, and having some shape.

2MuchMark 09-22-2011 01:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Harmon (Post 18444153)

Oh no!!!

(Bahahahahahahaha... sorry...bahahaha..)

ShellyCrash 09-22-2011 01:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dirty F (Post 18444490)
The fuck? Is that from that site? I was afraid to click it and now i know why.

Yeah, that's from the site.

ShellyCrash 09-22-2011 01:42 PM

Everyone has their own idea of sexy, personally I think women who look like women are where it's at.

http://wallpapers.skins.be/aria-giov...24x768-586.jpg

Big jugs, big hips, little waspy waist- Aria Giovanni, Tura Satana, Pam Grier.

I don't get the under developed / under age look. Going back to the article the posted the other day, if that site really takes off I think that says way worse things about our society and sexuality than that the success of Live Jasmine ever could. :Oh crap

halfpint 09-22-2011 01:48 PM

ohh shitt I run a teen blog and that is not one I would use for it even if she is of age, just to risky..

Scott McD 09-22-2011 01:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ShellyCrash (Post 18444842)

Now THAT is hot !!!! Go Aria... :pimp

rogueteens 09-22-2011 02:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by helterskelter808 (Post 18444331)
because those countries have changed their laws to fall in line with the US law of 18+. The reason for that, aside from possible US pressure


wot?????

ilnjscb 09-22-2011 02:17 PM

creeeeeeeeeeepy

HomerSimpson 09-22-2011 02:22 PM

according to her passport she was born on 1986 meaning that she has 25 years now
http://www.angiecutie.com/webmaster.php

you can download her passport from there...
but question is - how old are pictures?

cordoba 09-22-2011 02:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rogueteens (Post 18444983)
wot?????

You didn't know that the Uk had changed the law to 18, or you don't understand that it was due to American pressure?

halfpint 09-22-2011 02:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cordoba (Post 18445101)
You didn't know that the Uk had changed the law to 18, or you don't understand that it was due to American pressure?

Its legal to have sex at 16 over here in the UK, however it is illegal to shoot porn content if the models are below the age of 18

helterskelter808 09-22-2011 02:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cordoba (Post 18444669)
From a moral perspective, the main issue should be whether these type of images lead to or reduce real offending. I remember reading recently that such a study was performed and it was found that virtual cp reduced the rate of real offending. I think the truly sick fucks are those who would prefer real children being abused over allowing adults to fantasise in their own minds about whatever they want to.

There's nothing to stop people fantasising in their own minds about anything. And this model is not being abused in any way she is just posing. Some people will say there is nothing wrong with kids doing that too. In fact didn't there used to be sites where they had kids posing 'provocatively', while clothed, which got into trouble? Anyway, me, I think there is something wrong with all of it.

For every argument about 'fake CP' being a substitute for real abuse, there's at least one argument saying that this kind of material encourages it, condones it, and is perhaps used by sickos to encourage kids to copy what's in the pics.

My personal opinion is this shit should be prohibited and I am totally bemused by people here who argue otherwise, presumably using totally misguided ideas about 'free expression'. The entire motivation for pandering to this 'interest' with this is to make money; nothing to do with free speech or giving someone an alternative to abusing kids.

cordoba 09-22-2011 02:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by halfpint (Post 18445123)
Its legal to have sex at 16 over here in the UK, however it is illegal to shoot porn content if the models are below the age of 18

It's legal to fuck your 16 year old girlfriend up the ass here but if you look at a self-shot pic online of a 25 year old woman with the body of a 17 year old then you will get 3 years jail time.

19teenporn 09-22-2011 02:35 PM

No thanks i will have to pass this time

L-Pink 09-22-2011 02:38 PM

Can I get a "Hi Daddy" fan sign?

.

Pseudonymous 09-22-2011 02:40 PM

Didn't read the thread, so im not sure if it's been mentioned. Thats the totalsupercuties girl, she's been around for a long time now. Definitely of age. Obviously i can't say whether she was when she started though. But she's always looked very young, even to this day.

SolarCash has been promoting her for ages. Im wondering if they own her solo site considering I don't see her on the TSC frontpage

mountainmiester 09-22-2011 02:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ShellyCrash (Post 18444842)
Everyone has their own idea of sexy, personally I think women who look like women are where it's at.

No doubt. I want a woman who looks like she might know what she is doing. On the other hand, this girls gonna be a hot milf if she doesn't starve to death first.

RandyD 09-22-2011 02:52 PM

Promoting this pedo shit, will only end in tears.

Joxxy 09-22-2011 03:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RandyD (Post 18445264)
Promoting this pedo shit, will only end in tears.

Tears do make the best lube.

cordoba 09-22-2011 03:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by helterskelter808 (Post 18445140)
Some people will say there is nothing wrong with kids doing that too. In fact didn't there used to be sites where they had kids posing 'provocatively', while clothed, which got into trouble? Anyway, me, I think there is something wrong with all of it.

Yea, Senator Mark Foley introduced a law that put a stop to that - you know, the one who was later busted for talking dirty to little boys. Shame he couldn't of just shuffled one off to a twink site when he had the urge instead of harrassing minors in real life.


Quote:

For every argument about 'fake CP' being a substitute for real abuse, there's at least one argument saying that this kind of material encourages it, condones it, and is perhaps used by sickos to encourage kids to copy what's in the pics.
Yes, but there's actual evidence that it acts as a substitute for real abuse.

Quote:

My personal opinion is this shit should be prohibited and I am totally bemused by people here who argue otherwise, presumably using totally misguided ideas about 'free expression'. The entire motivation for pandering to this 'interest' with this is to make money; nothing to do with free speech or giving someone an alternative to abusing kids.
I'm curious as to know where you would draw the line. Presumably you would like all teen porn sites banned. I don't think I've ever seen any legal 18/19 teen site that doesn't make some reference to 'innocence' or 'nubile' or 'soft' etc etc.

Are you equally outraged by gore sites that contain videos of real children being beaten up, run over by trucks etc and which get thousands of hits daily and whose webmasters often come in here asking for link trades and sponsors?

Anway, the beef I have with this site being in here is that even viewing such pics is illegal in half of the world and American peeps here should be aware of this when posting them.

AdultKing 09-22-2011 03:53 PM

These images should be removed, however we know how slow the mods are at doing anything so the sickos can whack off just a little longer.

As pointed out, this is VIRTUAL CHILD PORNOGRAPHY. These images are not legal in Australia or many other jurisdictions.

Wake up Eric and kill this thread please :2 cents:

TheDA 09-22-2011 04:07 PM

I've avoided promoting this one like the plague.

Too dodgy for here in the UK if you ask me.

I think one of the co-owners of the prog is from the UK too I believe. Wonder if he'll be having a talk with Special Branch next time he goes through customs :)


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:54 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123