GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) has the internet pirates squirming and sweating! (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1043875)

Phoenix 11-01-2011 02:59 PM

what is it with any half serious thread turning into a freak show?

crockett 11-01-2011 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frank21 (Post 18527774)
Yes funny no more internet freedom.
And if you had read the whole bill you would know that will be used against you too by sueing you for the music you have in some of your vids.
1 song in 1 vid is enough to shut down your whole website.

Then don't steal other peoples work..

shade001 11-01-2011 03:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DamianJ (Post 18529301)
It amazes me when pornographers want to give control to the government to censor the internet.

This. ^

Just dumb. People fall for this 'it's for the children', 'it's only for terrorists', 'it's only for content theft' bullshit every time.

It's about control of dumber and dumber people. This country gets less intelligent by the nanosecond.

L-Pink 11-01-2011 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 18530628)
Then don't steal other peoples work..

Sad how few understand this.

glamourmodels 11-01-2011 03:55 PM

sicone, you are wasting your time. People in general, and especially Americans, are too stoopid to comprehend or care about your point.

I used to try to educate people like you did in your post and disagree with the global elite's plans, but the truth is that people are like dumb animals that need to be controlled and should not be allowed the right to self-determination. People want to be slaves, they crave it. All the average American wants is to sit in front of the teevee and let the waves wash over him, numbing his mind.

I used to try to educate people about the economy while they laughed and bragged about their big house that they could not afford and listen to them go on about their great 401K and how much they were making in the ponzi scheme aka the stock market. I don't hear them bragging so much nowadays... and the masters of the Universe are just getting warmed up. 2008 was just a prelude of what is to come.

The imbeciles like rob and the other posters on here who support this are the same dumb bootlickers who think the Patriot Act is for "brown people" and not them. You guys have a hell of a surprise coming to you, and no one deserves their fate more.

You guys remind me of most of the Jews living in Germany in 1933, who despite all evidence to the contrary thought things would work out just fine while the smart ones who could see clearly got the fuck out of Dodge.

People get the government they deserve, and boy do most of you guys deserve what is coming to you LOL.

Good luck with that-

p.s.- supporters of Wikileaks should be aware that under section 202 of this bill it would shut down Wikileaks and any other whistleblower websites like them, just FYI.

Oh wait... you mean this would not be just for Rapidshare and the tubez cause I am such an idiot... you mean this bill would do that too? Derrrr, geez I guess I can be bothered to actually read the bill like you dude cause I am too busy cheering for the death of free speech while I have my finger up my ass like the typical imbecile on here.

Where is the facepalm smiley?

https://gfy.com/showthread.php?p=18530715

Quote:

Originally Posted by sicone (Post 18530126)
http://gigaom.com/2011/10/27/looks-l...-the-internet/

This bill plus the E-parasite bill being pushed through will do a lot more then just go after pirates. Read carefully, it gives business's and the government the ability to remove any content/sites that they feel may be harmful to their brand or to the public. Think wiki leaks, any of the anti pay pal sites, sites on 9/11 and even sites about whats going on with the government.

Anything big brother and the corporations funding big brother don't want you to see will be removed... the content, the websites and any traces in search engines along with the ability process payments from users.

Think about it, say you say something negative about the movie you just saw last night and that studio feels you may hurt their profits so they simply snap their fingers and your website is now shut down and belongs to them with no legal hearing or recourse for you.


glamourmodels 11-01-2011 03:57 PM

what he said...


Quote:

Originally Posted by shade001 (Post 18530686)
This. ^

Just dumb. People fall for this 'it's for the children', 'it's only for terrorists', 'it's only for content theft' bullshit every time.

It's about control of dumber and dumber people. This country gets less intelligent by the nanosecond.


sarettah 11-01-2011 04:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eric (Post 18530407)
goodbye...

You are so at the top of my Christmas list.

What kind of wine do you like?



.

Paul Markham 11-01-2011 04:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nautilus (Post 18529606)
They earn proportionally more and should be able to hire additional staff or implement relevant tech. If they do not earn enough money to do that, it's their problem how to monetize their traffic.

But how hard it actually is to police even a huge site? Not that hard actually. Here are a few simple steps:

7. Hand over the details of offenders to the copyright holders.

That would scare people. What do you think Damian?

Paul Markham 11-01-2011 04:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DamianJ (Post 18529622)
I'll say! :D :D :D :D

Funny thing is, you are malicious lying without any shred of evidence to back up your libel. Whereas you actually said everything I am posting about you.

Someone told me once you sexually assaulted someone working for you. Is that true too?

I'm just asking questions.

someone told me you were a pirate and made money from piracy, Is that true too? :1orglaugh

Paul Markham 11-01-2011 04:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DamianJ (Post 18529630)
Why do you think, since the invention of the printing press, it's not been stopped then?

It is utterly, uncategorically impossible to stop piracy. Not even worth debating if you think it is.

SOPA is not about stopping piracy. And certainly not about stopping porn piracy. It's about control.

Should that be the law's stance on all crime they can't stop. Or just piracy?

Offline lives in a world controlled. How did we manage before the Internet?
A controlled media brought down a President.
Brought down a UK Government.
Recently put MPs in jail.
Now might put cricketers in jail.

Do you see Governments trying to control offline media so they're not exposed as corrupt?

No of course not, you're grabbing at straws. Why is what has me thinking you have other reasons. Am I wrong to think that?

Paul Markham 11-01-2011 04:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WarChild (Post 18530321)
Eric really likes to dish out punishment for violating the rules about bringing other people's family in to things on the board. Damian, why don't you do everyone a favour and send off a quick email to have Marion removed from the board, again.

Might just do that with Damian on his old trail of making groundless accustations. Thanks for the reminder.

awwhoez 11-01-2011 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by glamourmodels (Post 18530718)
sicone, you are wasting your time. People in general, and especially Americans, are too stoopid to comprehend or care about your point.

I used to try to educate people like you did in your post and disagree with the global elite's plans, but the truth is that people are like dumb animals that need to be controlled and should not be allowed the right to self-determination. People want to be slaves, they crave it. All the average American wants is to sit in front of the teevee and let the waves wash over him, numbing his mind.

I used to try to educate people about the economy while they laughed and bragged about their big house that they could not afford and listen to them go on about their great 401K and how much they were making in the ponzi scheme aka the stock market. I don't hear them bragging so much nowadays... and the masters of the Universe are just getting warmed up. 2008 was just a prelude of what is to come.

The imbeciles like rob and the other posters on here who support this are the same dumb bootlickers who think the Patriot Act is for "brown people" and not them. You guys have a hell of a surprise coming to you, and no one deserves their fate more.

You guys remind me of most of the Jews living in Germany in 1933, who despite all evidence to the contrary thought things would work out just fine while the smart ones who could see clearly got the fuck out of Dodge.

People get the government they deserve, and boy do most of you guys deserve what is coming to you LOL.

Good luck with that-

p.s.- supporters of Wikileaks should be aware that under section 202 of this bill it would shut down Wikileaks and any other whistleblower websites like them, just FYI.

Oh wait... you mean this would not be just for Rapidshare and the tubez cause I am such an idiot... you mean this bill would do that too? Derrrr, geez I guess I can be bothered to actually read the bill like you dude cause I am too busy cheering for the death of free speech while I have my finger up my ass like the typical imbecile on here.

Where is the facepalm smiley?

https://gfy.com/showthread.php?p=18530715

what he said...:thumbsup:thumbsup:thumbsup

Redrob 11-01-2011 05:20 PM

Glamourmodels, do you advertise on sites with pirated content?

Your site looks like any other dating site.

blackmonsters 11-01-2011 05:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix (Post 18527678)
any tube sites want to get a start and stream legal content.

im here and ready :)

You never sent me an email with embed codes or flv files so that I could
categorize things the way I wanted and that's why I only have your content
on a low traffic site.

I kept waiting for them.


I would like to get a list of flv files with descriptions and thumbs like this :

http://dot.com/video.flv|hot babe in shower|http://dot.com/images/hotbabeshower.jpg

porno jew 11-01-2011 06:26 PM

the freedom of the internet is more important than the entertainment industry. i make my living at it but who cares? everyone could do something more useful in their lives but selling fantasy and encouraging delusion.

Phoenix 11-01-2011 08:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackmonsters (Post 18530953)
You never sent me an email with embed codes or flv files so that I could
categorize things the way I wanted and that's why I only have your content
on a low traffic site.

I kept waiting for them.


I would like to get a list of flv files with descriptions and thumbs like this :

http://dot.com/video.flv|hot babe in shower|http://dot.com/images/hotbabeshower.jpg

lemme get them i know we setup it up for you.
ill have a look around and email them over

Nautilus 11-01-2011 09:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by glamourmodels (Post 18530718)
p.s.- supporters of Wikileaks should be aware that under section 202 of this bill it would shut down Wikileaks and any other whistleblower websites like them, just FYI.

And of course that wikileaks site should be saved at OUR expense. In order for it to survive, we need to allow hordes of parasites to eat us alive.

Piracy sites should continue to thrive because such is the price of freedom. And of course your views have nothing to do with the fact that all piracy sites have those cosy little ad spots available to push crap dating directories. It's strictly about freedom and fighting oppressive gummints.

porno jew 11-01-2011 09:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 18530830)
Might just do that with Damian on his old trail of making groundless accustations. Thanks for the reminder.

problem is no one likes or respects you.

Robbie 11-01-2011 09:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frank21 (Post 18527938)
No they start with your website. If you do it again you loose your "privilage" to access the internet.

Contrary to what you believe this bill will not be used to catch only the big guys who actualy make money with stealing stuff. But will be used against people like you and me.
I dont think it is stealing music if they force it dwn your throath on radio comercials and stuff like that.
And yes i did throw away my tv and radio cause i do not even want to listen their music.
But i do not think their crap can be a reason to shut down websites and youtube accounts.

I see nothing wrong with musicians protecting their work. People have no business using music that isn't theirs.

If you had skin in the game you would realize what piracy has done to all of us. And it did the same thing to the music industry.

Fuck thieves.

JohnRingo 11-01-2011 10:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frank21 (Post 18527774)
Yes funny no more internet freedom.
And if you had read the whole bill you would know that will be used against you too by sueing you for the music you have in some of your vids.
1 song in 1 vid is enough to shut down your whole website.

And since myfeecams models have copywritten music playing all the time they will go down too

Matyko 11-01-2011 11:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frank21 (Post 18527774)
Yes funny no more internet freedom.
And if you had read the whole bill you would know that will be used against you too by sueing you for the music you have in some of your vids.
1 song in 1 vid is enough to shut down your whole website.

Yes, and it's cool! Theft is theft :2 cents:

RycEric 11-01-2011 11:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JohnRingo (Post 18531238)
And since myfeecams models have copywritten music playing all the time they will go down too

Not quite.. I already told you that's on the models not them.

Paul Markham 11-02-2011 12:14 AM

Can anyone point out how a law to stop piracy is going to effect my freedom please.

No smart Alec replies. Just point out what in the law makes them bringing down piracy a threat to my freedom to publish and read the truth or grab products that are put out by the owners of licenses that allows them to do this?

DamianJ 11-02-2011 12:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 18530815)
I'm just asking questions.

someone told me you were a pirate and made money from piracy, Is that true too? :1orglaugh

Someone told me you actually had sex with an underage girl , filmed and posted on here saying that.

Is that true?

Someone else said you raped your make up assistant.

Is that true?

How long do you want to play this game Markham? You are just lying. I am posting things people said to me at trade shows, and you know it.

porno jew 11-02-2011 12:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DamianJ (Post 18531402)

Someone else said you raped your make up assistant.

that sounds like something a deluded self-centered narcissist would do, not our friend paul m.

Paul Markham 11-02-2011 01:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DamianJ (Post 18531402)
Someone told me you actually had sex with an underage girl , filmed and posted on here saying that.

Is that true?

Someone else said you raped your make up assistant.

Is that true?

How long do you want to play this game Markham? You are just lying. I am posting things people said to me at trade shows, and you know it.

The only time I had sex with an underage girl was when I was underage.

I was once accused by a girl of raping her, she dropped the charges immediately when the police told her I filmed everything that went on in my studio. I have posted that here and told the story many times.

So the lies about me raping a make up artist is just that a lie. One of my make up artists was Vida Garman, good luck trying anything with Vida. The other one did Eva's make up for our wedding. So she wasn't raped. Her husband was a soldier and he would of killed me.

So you post other peoples lies. I guess that condemns you to a rest from GFY. Want to name the people who told you this so they can come here and defend you?

If all it takes to break rules is to say "Someone told me" then the rules are for nothing.

Quote:

Originally Posted by porno jew (Post 18531406)
that sounds like something a deluded self-centered narcissist would do, not our friend paul m.

It sounds like Damian twisting a lie to "I heard that" it makes the rules a joke if all we have to say is "Someone told me."

DamianJ 11-02-2011 01:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 18531426)
So the lies about me raping a make up artist is just that a lie.

I just asked a question Paul. I didn't post a lie. Unlike you.

So anyway, back to your friends advising you not to get a teaching job in case you couldn't control your urges to fuck a child. How do they feel about your new venture of teaching children?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 18531426)

If all it takes to break rules is to say "Someone told me" then the rules are for nothing.

Yeah, bet you wish you hadn't started baselessly accusing me of illegal activity now.

Funny thing is, you are just maliciously lying trying to hurt my reputation and business, whereas I am just posting things you have posted here yourself. It must be so embarrassing to shot yourself in the foot. Repeatedly. I guess you are old...

Paul Markham 11-02-2011 01:11 AM

I think you have an interest in piracy on your repeated statements on the fight to stop it. You have always ridiculed, complained and protested about any attempts to restrict or slow down piracy.

You base your lies on "Someone told me."

I don't have to hear what others tell me to form an opinion. I read your words.

DamianJ 11-02-2011 01:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 18531432)
I think you have an interest in piracy on your repeated statements on the fight to stop it.

So you have some proof? You know this is a forum and you are libelling me, right?

Whereas you actually did post saying your friends said it would be a bad idea for you to be in charge of a room of 15 year olds, and you did post saying teachers need a will of iron to resist fucking 15 year olds.

Can you see the difference?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 18531432)

You have always ridiculed, complained and protested about any attempts to restrict or slow down piracy.


That's because history has PROVEN it is a total waste of time and money.


Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 18531432)
You base your lies on "Someone told me."

What lies?

Paul Markham 11-02-2011 01:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DamianJ (Post 18531430)
I just asked a question Paul. I didn't post a lie. Unlike you.

So anyway, back to your friends advising you not to get a teaching job in case you couldn't control your urges to fuck a child. How do they feel about your new venture of teaching children?

More lies. where did you get that one from? I joked about 15 year olf girls here being very flirty. And teachers needing to resist them. The rest is your lies.

Quote:

Yeah, bet you wish you hadn't started baselessly accusing me of illegal activity now.
I didn't accuse you, I asked you. I told you an opinion. I don't think you're that good at marketing. I don't think you're that good at anything. But I do get the impression you're very anti any control of piracy and always have been. You're very clued up on it. So basing an opinion on it.

Quote:

Funny thing is, you are just maliciously lying trying to hurt my reputation and business, whereas I am just posting things you have posted here yourself. It must be so embarrassing to shot yourself in the foot. Repeatedly. I guess you are old...
Hi Pot I'm Kettle.

Your reputation and business are not something I can do a lot of harm to. you do that yourself by posting videos of yourself in your home.

You have constantly criticised my work and my business. Accusing me of shooting scared girls, of dry pussies and more.

And now you twist something I've said here and twisted it into a lie. Ad added your own lies.

Post proof.

DamianJ 11-02-2011 01:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 18531439)
More lies. where did you get that one from? I joked about 15 year olf girls here being very flirty. And teachers needing to resist them. The rest is your lies.

You said it Paul, you said it. Bless you. Of course you can claim it was a "joke" but you said the words.


Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 18531439)
But I do get the impression you're very anti any control of piracy and always have been. You're very clued up on it. So basing an opinion on it.

There is no control of piracy. You cannot control it. Only idiots like you think you can. So I point out why you are wrong. That doesn't make me a pirate. It makes me against stupidity.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 18531439)
Post proof.

Of what?

Paul Markham 11-02-2011 02:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DamianJ (Post 18531442)
There is no control of piracy. You cannot control it. Only idiots like you think you can. So I point out why you are wrong. That doesn't make me a pirate. It makes me against stupidity.

So if a crime can't be controlled we shouldn't try?

To what level, do you think, the minimum should be to warrant it being controlled?

Your thinking is beyond stupid. If it was applied to everything the police would disappear. You would get mugged, robbed, burgled and no one would stop them. Because it couldn't be controlled.

In a modern civilised society we do what we can to minimise the law breakers. No one expects all crime to disappear over night and only the foolish think that passing a law means the crime will disappear. To make a crime disappear. you just make it legal. Is that your argument?

Reading this thread it's obvious that those with something to protect are in favors of protecting what they have. Those with little to protect or profiting from the crime are saying, that any control is wrong. for what ever reason they can think of.

Well change is coming. Too many big companies and countries lose too much revenue to piracy for it to continue.

The West leads the world in "Digital media" from porn to programs. This is a huge revenue generating business. To allow sites in countries or owned that don't have a hand in creating and profiting from their work isn't going to carry on. It costs them too much money.

Apple will need to rethink iTunes, Youtube, Twitter, etc will need to rethink itself. Sites that advertise on piracy sites will have to look at their strategy as the piracy sites get closed. Adapt or die.

Whether this law or the next one goes through is just a matter of time. Change is coming. I thought you guys loved change?

So far no one has illustrated how laws to stop piracy will effect my freedom.

DamianJ 11-02-2011 02:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 18531479)
So if a crime can't be controlled we shouldn't try?

Because it is a waste of time, effort, resources and money.


Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 18531479)
Apple will need to rethink iTunes

Why? Seriously, can you explain what iTunes is in one sentence?

nextri 11-02-2011 02:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 18531382)
Can anyone point out how a law to stop piracy is going to effect my freedom please.

No smart Alec replies. Just point out what in the law makes them bringing down piracy a threat to my freedom to publish and read the truth or grab products that are put out by the owners of licenses that allows them to do this?

Your freedom will be limited in the way that you can no longer create any sort of social or interactive website. The law is directly preventing innovation on the internet, it creates censorship in that each and every website owner will need to moderate each and every user interaction, which is in fact impossible to do, so such websites can no longer exists. There can be no blog networks like wordpress.org because just one infringing blog can get the whole network closed down. How is that not limiting your freedom?

Answer this simple question:
Should facebook have to have moderators to moderate each and every status update, user comment and photo upload from their 700 million users?
Should youtube be forced to approve each and every one of the thousands of videos that gets uploaded every minute?

If your answer is no to these questions, then you can't approve of this bill, cause that is what they will need to do in order to still operate their sites without worrying about suddenly getting shut down, without having a say in the matter.

How are they suppose to be able to have enough moderators who even know if any of the content is infringing anyone's intellectual property? It is impossible, and the sites couldn't operate like today. Not to mention the websites would be useless if they couldn't have real time updates.

There should definitely be done things to fight piracy, but not in ways that can result in websites being taken down without due process. If they are going to make a law to target sites that are mainly distributing copyrighted material, they need to make it a lot more specific so it doesn't destroy the very basis of an open social interactive internet.

AsianDivaGirlsWebDude 11-02-2011 03:04 AM



This sounds like a job for Winston Wolf... :pimp

Ban both Paul and Damian - problem solved. :thumbsup

Make me a fucking mod, and I swear some knucklehead noggins would be knocked together and rolling around gfy'ville (might try and use some AVN resources to actually conduct a real investigation or two as well, lol).

:angrysoap

Well, at least one good thing came from this thread, Silly Rant / ondree was (finally) banned (again).

http://mozlo.com/gfy/cry-baby2.gif

I guess AVN should still keep Tender Thighs on the payroll (the old fart should be just about due to start pulling pension one of these days, I reckon). :party-smi

ADG

DamianJ 11-02-2011 03:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AsianDivaGirlsWebDude (Post 18531521)

Well, at least one good thing came from this thread, Silly Rant / ondree was (finally) banned (again).


Thanks to my unfaltering work in trolling the cunt until he finally went too far. I think it was repeatedly posting that picture of him that was doing his head in.

If I was banned, Marion would still be here.

Think about what you wish for, my friend.

:D

Jel 11-02-2011 03:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nautilus (Post 18529513)
Oh noes... What an oppressive burden it is to actually check what's going on at your fucking site. That's so fucking hard OMG the sky is falling what those evil obsolete outdated copyright holders want from us. It's their duty to produce content for us and then to police our sites too and do all other dirty ground work for us, while we should only be creative and innovative meaning we're entitled to enjoy free content created by other people and we aren't going to spent a minute of our precious time to respect the rights of people who actually created the content that made our "innovative" services worth a shit to surfers.

Yawn. Same old song we've been hearing over and over again for years.

Speaking of huge and unnecessary burdens, have any of you free shit lovers ever tried to police literally dozens of thousands of piracy sites that post links to stolen content? Do you know what kind of burden it is? Do you know how astronomically huge piracy numbers are and that no copyright holder will not be able to check 1/10th of it in his entire lifetime? Now THAT'S the burden, but of course it is OK because it's them evil obsolete copyright holders have to do it. Save God some brilliant innovative kid that is scheming new youtube in his garage is forced to do it. That's the end of the world. No more innovation. Oppression and totalitarism. But of course.

:thumbsup

Jel 11-02-2011 03:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DamianJ (Post 18529630)
It is utterly, uncategorically impossible to stop piracy. Not even worth debating if you think it is.

It's impossible to stop ANYTHING with laws, are you saying we shouldn't have speeding laws, racism laws, sexism laws, murder laws, rape laws, fines for littering, laws for everything we currently have laws for that still happen anyway? You'll never stop it, so don't bother making it harder, or put deterrents in place - is that the argument you're putting across with your statement?

DamianJ 11-02-2011 03:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jel (Post 18531538)
It's impossible to stop ANYTHING with laws, are you saying we shouldn't have speeding laws, racism laws, sexism laws, murder laws, rape laws, fines for littering, laws for everything we currently have laws for that still happen anyway? You'll never stop it, so don't bother making it harder, or put deterrents in place - is that the argument you're putting across with your statement?

Do speeding cameras reduce the incidences of people speeding? Oh yes! They do. Massively.

Does punishment reduce crime? Yes! Do people get rehabilitated? Yes!

Has ANY law that has been EVER passed had ANY impact on piracy? No. Has ANYTHING every had an impact on piracy? No. It is bigger than it ever ever was.

Hope that clarifies my position.

Piracy == bad.
Wasting money and time trying to stop piracy == pointless.

Paul Markham 11-02-2011 03:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nextri (Post 18531506)
Your freedom will be limited in the way that you can no longer create any sort of social or interactive website. The law is directly preventing innovation on the internet, it creates censorship in that each and every website owner will need to moderate each and every user interaction, which is in fact impossible to do, so such websites can no longer exists. There can be no blog networks like wordpress.org because just one infringing blog can get the whole network closed down. How is that not limiting your freedom?

BS WP is the tool. not the user and therefore not to blame.

Quote:

Answer this simple question:
Should facebook have to have moderators to moderate each and every status update, user comment and photo upload from their 700 million users?
Should youtube be forced to approve each and every one of the thousands of videos that gets uploaded every minute?
Libel is the crime of the libeler, not the medium the libel appears on. Disabling the ability to post any content and problem solved.

Can The New York Times post pictures they have no right to post? Will they or the advertiser be liable for submission? Will they be held responsible for posting pictures of naked children or allowing others to?

We can live without Youtube.

Quote:

If your answer is no to these questions, then you can't approve of this bill, cause that is what they will need to do in order to still operate their sites without worrying about suddenly getting shut down, without having a say in the matter.
Well my answer is yes.

Quote:

How are they suppose to be able to have enough moderators who even know if any of the content is infringing anyone's intellectual property? It is impossible, and the sites couldn't operate like today. Not to mention the websites would be useless if they couldn't have real time updates.
So they can't operate and stay legal. goodbye to criminals on the basis, they can't afford to be criminals.

Quote:

There should definitely be done things to fight piracy, but not in ways that can result in websites being taken down without due process. If they are going to make a law to target sites that are mainly distributing copyrighted material, they need to make it a lot more specific so it doesn't destroy the very basis of an open social interactive internet.
How much due process will be to establish Youtube is full of pirated content?

Of course it needs to be done with due process. But a legal site getting pulled down on a false claim. Is that your fear?

We can have a open social interactive internet. Just not one where people are allowed to post the property of others. If I break into your house and steal your computer then set up a place where anyone can use it. Is that an open social interactive operation?

Many peoples freedom is being limited now by pirates. Freedom to make money to feed their children, freedom to develop and innovate and get a ROI on that work. Freedom to work for someone who is doing this. Are their freedoms secondary to yours so you can post their hard work on Youtube or where ever you want, so you can have a open social interactive internet?

One man's freedom seems to be another man's loss of freedom.

Laws that apply offline, should apply online.

Quote:

Make me a fucking mod, and I swear some knucklehead noggins would be knocked together and rolling around gfy'ville (might try and use some AVN resources to actually conduct a real investigation or two as well, lol).
:2 cents:

Many get away with too much because of the lack of moderation. A stricter application of the rules is long overdue.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:33 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc