50 vaccines in that bitch already

Yet another nutjob that truthers take seriously. lol

I thought 9-11 was an inside job? Why is she claiming terrorists perpetrated it?

She must be a government agent obfuscating the truth.

Haha is she?

Wow the NY Times discredits Susan Lindauer...who would have thunk it.

But how about we take a look at the actual case documents
http://img856.imageshack.us/img856/4627/casedocsl.gif

and on and on in this actual factual case file, more people testifying to her sanity...

So sure, Lindauer is obviously just a nut case and I've got two towers to sell you in Manhattan.

i want one hat, because i think 9 11 is inside job or falseflag operation

Well she seems to be saying that it was BOTH and act of terrorism AND a controlled demolition. Because that's the only reasonable explanation you see..

So.... according to you guys. The Federal Government (and infinitely large list of co-conspirators) can orchestrate the murder of 3000 people in downtown Manhattan in broad daylight, in front of millions of eye witnesses, being video taped and televised from every angle - including helicopters and then effectively get away with it... but when it comes to dealing with one lunatic woman, they really dropped the ball?

Pulling off one of the most fantastic covert "false flag" and mass murder operations in the history of the world... are then suddenly too inept to get rid of deal with one single woman, that they had to pull all these legal maneuvers in a court of law, on public record... and in YOUR minds, this is where it all starts to fall apart?

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Stop being such a tool and read the court docs.

DID YOU EVEN WATCH THE VIDEO YOU MINDLESS SHEEP? WATCH THE FUCKING VIDEO AND TURN OFF FOX NEWS YOU MINDLESS SHEEP! THEN GOOGLE RON PAUL ILLUMINATI BOHEMIAN GROVE ALEX JONES JEFF RENSE! BAHH BAHH YOU SHEEP!

haha. :1orglaugh:1orglaugh

And BTW... is Obama now a part of the massive 9/11 Conspiracy? I mean, is he just kept in the dark? Or is he now a part of it and willing participant in its cover up? He's just bombing Pakistan for fun? Escalating troops in Afghanistan for absolutely no reason at all than to help Blackwater or Haliburton or KBR or Boeing and others get more military contracts?

you know she knows something they way they try make her to be insane LOL

(i didnt watch video)

So...just because it's not your own country, you can't be worried about it?

Well then...I guess Americans have a lot of explaining to do then because they worry A LOT about other countries.

Angry much?

Why do i need to google the names of a bunch of known lunatics? Why not google Care Bears and Richard Simmons while I'm at it?

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

yes and the propaganda outlet the seattle weekly and numerous other media establishments all were in one the conspiracy as well.

post Judge Mukasey's ruling and we can all take a look at that.

ANY court case is the same exact thing dipshit.

Allegations are made/Charges are filed.
A bunch of arguments are made, refuting the allegations/charges, claiming they are baseless and without merit.
THEN a judge/jury decides who is right and decides punishment.

Thats the general process - since you seem to be so completely unaware of how the legal system works.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Yes genius and here is your hero Noam Chomsky talking about how the CIA organized and trained Al-Qaeda before 9/11...he's obviously a real nut job isn't he? :1orglaugh


So here is my question to you or any other status quo thinker out there...

If Noam Chomsky sees a direct connection with the CIA and Al Qaeda, then how is it not possible that the CIA was directly involved in 9/11?

Awaiting your answers...

Jokes... you dont get them. How sad. :(

if she is such a threat why was she let out? why not do what they did to jose padilla? makes no sense if you are claiming conspiracy.

haha.. i was reading your post and thinking "but,... i thought he was one of the normal ones"

Sorry.

Let's just say, hypothetically, that the conspiracy theorists are right and 9/11 was a huge cover-up with more twists and turns than if M. Night Shyamalan and Rod Serling had a baby and fed it LSD. Let's just say you're all right, and as citizens we've been no better off than taking the Blue Pill vs the Red Pill.

Fine. You've educated us, stripped away the blinders, and here we are. ....Now that I know these new facts, what do you propose I do?

See, that's where it all falls apart. Knowledge is useless and academic without a practical plan to act upon it. If I know that blueberry muffins taste better if I put butter on them than margarine, I can choose to buy butter and use it. If I know that infinitely well-armed and bottomlessly financed government agencies and elected officials are manipulating the media to exert control over public opinion and sway it to support their own machiavellian designs.... well, there's bugger all I can do about that, and really, I just want a blueberry muffin.

Stop wasting your time and live your life.

Atleast he's never claimed some hair-brained bullshit like Terrorists + Controlled Demolition = 9-11


Idiots like yourself will fucking believe any old bullshit story that even remotely fits in your retarded world-view

what does noam have to do with your arguments with the lindauer case? oh right nothing, but now it is time to deflect. maybe throw in that's i'm a fox news and tmz watching sheep. maybe that i eat mcdonald's as well.

No genius, I am talking about the facts in the document refuting claims made that Lindauer was insane at the time. There is no argument refuting the allegations, there are FACTS given by doctors observing Lindauer.

post the judge's ruling. of course you know that her lawyers can claim anything right? you know how courts work?

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh angry much?

They did not say "insane". That's not the language of the court.

Nice try.

oh no, did i just tread on your hero as well:(

You have got to be fucking kidding me... Do you have to have above average intelligence to understand that those dingleberry's on screen are not people to take seriously? This is so bad it looks like an SNL skit mocking truthers... You have Frank Oz's brother hosting this thing in a bad hawaiian shirt, the dogs playing poker large sized painting in the background and betty whites retarded sister smiling and gaffing into a microphone.

This is what you have for us? This is what we are supposed to take seriously?

dcat... you have completely embarrassed yourself... This is some pretty shameful shit to say the least. You would have done a more convincing job if you video taped your improve group after a few drinks. Or maybe next time you should go to your local mental hospital and record what some of those guys believe what happened. Hit up some derelicts in the park in toronto! That would be great!

The truth about 9/11 is it exposes people who are completely bored of their own lives...

cia asset... fucking hell that's funny...

Those "facts" ARE the arguments of the defense refuting the allegations.

Get it?

Do you really not familiar with the court system and how it works are you?

No wonder the world is such a confusing place to you where your only explanation for extraordinary events are rooted in fantasy.

no but you have treaded on rationality and critical thinking. i do find that offensive.

No you just posted an irrelevant video of him trying to back up your bullshit case, moron.

did you not read the doc? it was not her lawyers saying she was sane, it was other doctors saying she was sane. are you saying her lawyers bought off the doctors to say something in her defense? i would call that truly delusional.

yes i read it. facepalm.jpg .....

Bradley Manning would like to know why he's going to be in prison for the rest of his life for leaking a bunch of shitty embassy cables. While this woman, who, is completely sane apparently, is allowed to walk free blowing the lid off of the biggest crime of the century.

Dude?

What "document"

Do you not see that its a motion by HER DEFENSE TEAM to have the judge reconsider her competence to stand trial?

What are you looking at?

Do you not understand that this IS NOT a document filed the court? Do you not see that its unsigned, undated, un notarized/unstamped etc etc etc? No mention of her legal counsel and who is acting on her behalf/representing her?

You have NO CLUE what you are looking at.


You are just another lunatic DESPERATELY grasping at straws.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

It's just a bullshit copy of something that may or may not even be real.

No moron, those are statements made by doctors and used by the defense. If those statements were not factual the very doctors would be at risk of perjury.

Now back away from the pipe:1orglaugh

this is how ordinary people get conflicted with all this bullshit... they take one piece of truth.. that being that the cia PAID MONEY and gave weapons to aid groups in Afghanistan, namely the taliban to assist them fighting the russians. They take that fact and spread it extremely thin and claim that they aided al quaeda to attack the US... that's one hell of a slippery slope.. and untrue.

also chomsky has flat out denied having any belief that the government had anything to do with the attacks, he's said it directly on video even..

You can't be at risk of perjury when you aren't testifying as a witness under oath. You certainly can't be at risk of perjury when quotes from you are being put on a fake court document to rouse a bunch of lunatics.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

no wonder you still live with your mother and believe in magic accountants.:1orglaugh

Dude,
Are you just a complete fucking idiot? Can you actually read?
Now without further haste please place your head back firmly up your ass where it belongs:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Since we're posting Chomsky vids... :)

If its filed with the court and public record... then its dated, stamped etc etc etc. Show me this document on the ney york district courts website where it was filed or in NY legal records and i'll believe you. Until then, its just a pdf that appears to be a motion that has yet to be filed or that was never filed.. or that was doctored and posted for people like you to use as "proof" since you're never going to question its legitimacy.

And thank you, as I was telling you, its a motion filed by the defense (i.e. her attorneys) to request the judge declare her competent to stand trial.

dude... if it was true, she'd be dead...

Whats the case number and what date was it filed and accepted by the court?


Oh... right.


Never mind.


It wasn't.


As far as we know its just a bullshit pdf to make people like you look like assholes because you aren't interested in facts or credible evidence.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh


Heres a filed motion:
https://www.eff.org/files/filenode/C...on_dismiss.pdf


Notice any differences??

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh
:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

And then of course... the obvious question to anyone possessing of any semblance of reason, if this is not an actual motion that was ALREADY filed with the court... then its not a document that's on the public record.

So,... uhm... where did it come from?

:2 cents:

Once again, reading is fundamental.

Case No. 03 Cr. 807

If you want to find out when it was filed look it up, otherwise...head back up yer ass:1orglaugh