Yes because the defense lawyers found some experts to say she's not crazy the case is closed. Well except of course that she's been ruled to be bat shit crazy, there's tons of others that have had interactions with her over the course of her life that say she's bat shit crazy and watching her for about 2.3 seconds you can clearly see she's bat shit crazy. The icing on the cake is she claims she has psychic powers. Not an ounce of crazy there at all.

It's simply amazing what some people will believe.

Threads like this are very helpful in sorting the run of the mill leftist radicals from the actual mentally ill (it is often hard to tell the difference). Thanks to all participants.

Two doctors say they saw nothing. Again, where is the Plaintiff's response and the judge's ruling?

That's all I'm saying, two doctors (and at least one of those in sworn testimony) said she displayed no abnormal behavior.
Based upon that I believe it's possible she was/is of sound mind and body.

Watching the video she struck me as a bit high strung and excited, but hardly "nuts."

As for the plaintiff's response I haven't seen it, but I would like to see it as well.

As for the judges ruling, I believe he ruled her unfit to stand trial.

So forgetting about everything else... lets get this straight.

A known anti war activist and journalist gets charged under the Patriot Act for being an unregistered agent working for iraqi intelligence, for accepting assignments and carrying them out and for accepting $10,000 payment.

She was incarcerated pending trial but later released as she was deemed unfit to stand trial. (odd for a government conspiracy)

A SECOND court also reaffirmed that she was unfit to stand trial.

She was then NOT PROSECUTED because she was unfit to stand trial and the federal district court in New York ordered her to be set free.

YOU are apparently upset because the legal system worked and a lunatic was set free because she was too fucking insane to understand what was going on and defend herself and the court ruled it had no right to demand she take anti psychotic drugs to make her "fit for trial"

THEN you are posting a bogus motion purportedly prepared by her attorneys (which would have come after her initial incarceration) for the court to reconsider its ruling and declare her fit for trial so that she could then be prosecuted and convicted and imprisoned as a spy?

AND you still seem to be incapable of understanding that the PDF you keep referrencing is obviously fake and was never filed to begin with, otherwise it would be dated, accepted, stamped etc etc etc. and not just full of blank lines for dates, case numbers, signatures and so on.






wow.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

You're like a dog chasing it's own tail:1orglaugh
First you say the doc is bogus, then you reference the doc to argue against me, and now you are saying the doc is bogus again...incredible.

:1orglaugh Are you just a complete idiot? I gave you the case number moron, its in this thread and it's on the document. The doc was scanned prior to being signed/notarized. Big fucking deal.


So one more time, if anyone is interested in reading the document which makes a good reference to the original video, don't waste your time with the trolls' posts...
just check it out for yourself-
http://electionfraudnews.com/News/sl...sideration.pdf










.

For future reference, you might want to learn what being a troll actually is. For a start, it's not somebody that merely disagrees with you. :2 cents:

Let me play devils advocate here, sir.

She says she has psychic powers. The country's slogan is "In God We Trust" and we all take a day off to celebrate zombie jesus coming back to life. Who's crazier?

At least there is some scientific possibility that electronic signals in our brain could travel into another mind.... just sayin.

I am saying its an unfiled motion for the court to reverse its decision that she's unfit to stand trial. UNFILED. Until proven otherwise, its just a random pdf that someone created for people EXACTLY like you.

Not sure why you can't understand that a legal document purportedly prepared by her attorneys and then not filed with the court is not legit.

Why is it online? From where? Her attorneys circulated an unfiled motion to request that the court(s) reverse the decision that she's batshit crazy? That can't happen legally.

You have a document with zero evidence that its even real and you're touting it as evidence that she's innocent.

WHY?

Are you so naive about the legal system?

Her attorneys can't legally make this document available to the public before its filed with the court. It's a pdf of an unfiled legal document. You have NO IDEA where it even came from or if its legit. You don't seem to care... but then again, you're not exactly sane either.

Where is the filed motion that was accepted by the court?

Yeah... if anyone has an interest reading a document which isn't likely to be real, but desperately need "evidence" that the boogeyman is out there... they should read it.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Upon further investigation, yes it was filed. Look at the Proof of Service (aka CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE, page 14/15).

But it proves nothing other than what the testimony of a couple of witnesses was.

And that was all I was saying. It simply states there was testimony from witnesses saying she was sane and able to stand trial.

And if anyone is interested, here is a recent article from the Seattle Weekly which is noteworthy more so for the exchange between Lindauer and the Seattle Weekly in the comments section.
"Susan Lindauer, Ex-P-I Reporter and Accused Spy for Iraq, a True Believer of 9/11 Conspiracy"
http://blogs.seattleweekly.com/daily...i_reporter.php

Proves what? It is just a pdf being served from a website for lunatics. Where is proof it was actually filed? Just because the document says it was filed electronically doesn't mean it actually was.

Obviously dipshit.

It's a motion supposedly prepared by the defense request that the court to reverse its decision that she is unfit to stand trial and to then try her for the crimes, rather than allow her to continued to be detained indefinitely.

It's purely procedural. What do you think her attorneys are going to say to try to get the court to reverse their decision so she can be tried?

The irony,.... she would be serving life in prison had her attorneys succeeded.

Caligari,

Prove the motion is actually real and actually was filed. It's not like its being downloaded from the federal courts website or something. Its a pdf being downloaded from a site for lunatics.

IF you can do that, we'll then get into the obvious fact that its purely procedural and is her own attorneys trying to ARGUE that she's not batshit crazy so that she can then be tried for her crimes.

Who convicted her? You and what court?

Sorry you old demented fucking retard.

I guess i should have said "could be serving..." since the simply irony of the motion itself and the fact i was pointing out that had the court reversed its decision, she would have been tried for multiple crimes carrying a life sentence, instead of being released from custody seems to escape both you and Caligari.

I missed that part. Clearly she's perfectly sane.

These people want to believe in this 9/11 truth stuff so bad that they'll take whatever they can get.

The lady be cuckoo.....

...of course, this doesn't mean she isn't 99% correct....

...but whatever, the "official story" is horseshit, but then ALL "official" stories are 99% horseshit by design....

carry on.

the other people move on though.