It's possible, but that applies to all porn on all domain extensions.

no it is not far reaching at all... it is drawing something out to an end that is a possibility even if it is a denied probability.

To what end? How would this scenario benefit ICM or it's customers?

Uhm no thats not ridiculous if you study governments and globalist companies then you kow thats exactly whats gonna happen.
They always lure you with good rules and slowly implement more and more regulations which will dictate everything you do.
Just like google, facebook, "democracy" etc etc.

Thats why we have top stop this madness before it can be made mandatory indeed.
Do us all a favour and stop your scam!

What IS ridiculous is that you state yourself that your policys "FOR NOW" are this and that but you do know you will change this rules as soon as enough people have signed up for it.

I like that one. :thumbsup

Please forgive me for laughing at your inclusion of "democracy." You were kidding right?

Yes, I do state that those policies are "for now." For example, IFFOR still needs to come to a determination for procedure if existing policies are violated. That in itself will eventually have to become part of policy. It does not however, mean that random policies will be enacted that will be detrimental to ICM and disenfranchise its customers. That would be to no ones benefit.

That is a really tough statement to try to add anything helpful to. ;)

No how can that be a joke?
We are being tricked in democracy and we get to vote, and slowly but by pre planned plan the system is becoming a dictatorship. While you still can vote your vote doesnt mean anything the system does whatever you want and whatever you vote.

It is very clear just by your intentions that you do want .XXX to become mandatory whatever you say does not matter since you and your organisation speaks with a double toung.

You say you THINK .XXX will not be mandatory therefore using this as argument isnt valid.
However you or your organisation states that it will be easy for parents to block porn by simply blocking .XXX sites on a PC, network or country.
Now this has totaly no use as only a small part of the sites is actualy on this .XXX extention.

So either you lie that you do not think .XXX will be mandatory or you lie by stating that anyone can block porn by blocking .XXX.

I'm going to skip the politics if that's alright?

Our intentions are simply to run a successful business venture, both for ICM and for .XXX domain owners, not to make our product mandatory. I said it was doubtful that .XXX would become mandatory, and that ICM is in no way promoting that it should be, so it's an entirely valid argument.

ICM's view on adult content and it's accessibility is quite clear. Rather than quote several long paragraphs of text, may I point you to about dot xxx and the subfolder of the same name?

Site labeling will make it easy for parents wishing to keep adult content away from their minor children will find it very easy to block the entire domain. Consumers wishing to find specific content that is of interest to them will find that easier to do as well, with clear and precise domain names as well as on search dot xxx.

If I didn't answer your concerns, please forgive me, but I'm having some difficulty understanding your argument. :(

Are they really different? I never knew that. I thought they were interchangable.

Programs buy spots all of the time on sites, even smaller sites. If I have a banner spot that I can usually get 10 sales a month from and I have a sponsor willing to pay me $450 for that spot up front when they usually give me $35 pps, guess which I am taking? Especially effective when the sponsor wants to be in the spot you are flying an in-house ad for another program.

I dont want to highjack TS his thread but it seems that your company can not even do the things they promise in emails let alone better the internet.
Your way of thinking of censoring everything is very dangerous indeed exactly what the governments are trying to do as well atm.

There is nothing wrong with the internet in my eyes so no need for ripoffs like .XXX.
100 dollar for a domainname OMG.
If it is only about the money as you claim it is then you can keep the money you extorted of mostly non-adult companys who had to buy their company.XXX name.

Because frankly anyone invested thousends, tens of thousends or even millions and thousends of hours in a pornsite isnt gonna change to a .XXX and redo or throw away everything only because it is easyer for pornsurfers to find.

If you try a google search you will find how easy it is actualy to find what you need. Weather it is porn or childgames.

There are filters to block porn way long ago just as there are labels to label your pornsite wich are implemented by all major search engines already.
And yes many Creditcard billers already require you to have this label embedded in the html.

Any kid or adult wich is not alowed to surf for porn will find it very easy to use a proxy to go around your scam.

Again your company does state all the time that this is the solution to prevent childporn and children seeing porn.
This goal can only be achieved if every website is behind the global .XXX censor wall.
Your goal can therefore only be achieved by making it mandatory sooner or later.
Wich will destroy everything i have worked hard for :mad: :321GFY

Oh and then "clear and precise domain names".....
So now you do not only want to censor the internet use trackers on every .XXX but also decide if someone is using a "clear and precise" domainname for his website?

What will happen if someone is using a domainname wich is not "clear and precise" ?