I really find it hard to believe when retards like you call absolutely EVERYTHING a PR stunt. As if controversial shit doesn't happen on it's own to quasi-celebrities.

The school had obviously not done it's research prior. Hence the reason why they officially denied that she had been there - or were they in on the PR stunt too?

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

For the win!

What a bunch of hypocrites. You're more than happy to help pimp out her porn scenes and hang out with porn chicks at conventions but the thought of her reading a book to children freaks you out or pisses you off?

Hey, guess what? I can promise you that every one of those kids is the product of two people FUCKING so there is nothing holier than thou going on in that school that some chick who got fucked in the butt for money can't participate in. How many parents and teachers were getting fucked in the butt the night before? Should we discriminate against them too. What if they were (GASP!) looking at porn?

Jesus, you'd think you people just ran out of church for a minute to post in this thread.

Face it, you want to keep this chick in the porn ghetto while no one knows you pimp porn for a living unless you tell them. Mighty white of ya.

if they would have had some big black cock negro pornstar reading instead he could have fucked the moms afterwards, the dads could have watched, and everyone would have been happy.

sounds like they did not think this one through.

Right on!

Wait, should I take offense to the "mighty white of ya" line since I'm white? :1orglaugh

considering i am white as well and yet we both have very different genetic backgrounds?

yes racist as the day is long

"And ATM doesn't always mean Automatic Teller Machine"

.

wrong account.

Sure thing genius. I'm sure she and her HBO handlers and PR crew were totally surprised that a few parents objected to a hardcore porn star reading books to little kids in a public school... and that the media started picking up on it.

I'm sure that just blew everyone away. I mean seriously... who could have seen that one coming!!??!!??!!
:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh


http://www.thisdepravedworld.com/fre...sasha-gray.jpg

Oh really?

No boundaries at all?

Why not registered sex offenders reading books to 1st graders?

I mean, since we have no lines to cross and its everyones "right"

You have no "right" to walk into a school and read books to little kids.

Incredible that so many people on this forum worldwide have no idea what "rights" are or even what the word means.

:2 cents:

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

That's your argument? I listed professional careers, and you substitute criminal offenses. I hope you brought your safety net, because that was one hell of a leap!

I never said "no boundaries," nor did I imply it. Sasha Grey, like a firefigher, a police officer, or an astronaut, made her money in a career that is legal.

I'm not really sure where you pulled sex offenders out of....unless you're making a connection between legitimate performers in the adult industry and sex offenders, in which case, if that's how you feel, what the fuck are you doing here?

I also didn't say she could just walk into the school and read books to little kids. You are being overly picky and entirely too technical with the term "rights" to make my post mean something else to back your case.

Sasha has every right to volunteer to the Read Across America program with the intent of reading books to elementary school children, just as I do, just as you do, just as Bob down the street does. If they meet whatever criteria RAA and/or the school set (criminal background checks, child abuse clearances?), then they continue to have the right to read books to the little kids. Sasha Grey obviously met all of that criteria, therefore she DOES have every right to read to those children.

Of course there should be boundaries. You claiming I said "fuck the boundaries" is just reaching for straws in your argument. To disqualify someone for a legal career they once held is utter bullshit.

Whats the difference? One could make the argument that they paid their debt to society so its perfectly fine for a registered sex offender to read books to 1st graders in a public school.

People feel its inappropriate for a porn star who pisses in a glass and drinks it while fingering herself to be in a public school reading books to little kids.

It's just shameless PR. It's not like there are only 5 people in the world that can read books to kids and communities need to be flexible and understanding in this area. It's not like no one knew parents were going to be pissed off.

At the end of the day, people find it inappropriate.

That was pretty predictable.

Only a total retard would not understand that people would find it inappropriate, no matter if you agree or disagree it.

:2 cents:

Link? ..............

Did you really just ask what the difference is between someone who engages in adult acts with other consenting adults legally and someone who committed acts on an unwilling, unconsenting, person, who may not even be of legal age?

If you really can't see the difference, I don't know know what to tell you. I'm actually speechless that this is your argument, especially being involved in this industry.


While there may be more than 5 people in the world that can read books to kids, sadly, it seems, there is an abundance of good, wholesome, god-fearing men and women who don't care enough to take the time to volunteer for things like this. So when some who meets the guidelines set forth volunteers, she should be welcomed, regardless of her past career.

Call me retarded if you will, but I don't think it was inappropriate. If she had shown up dressed like a stripper or porn star, then it would have been inappropriate for the school to allow her in. But she didn't. She presented herself in a wholesome, completely appropriate manner. In fact, I've seen teachers dress more inappropriately on a daily basis than what Sasha did.

I don't think it was inappropriate to bring in a retired porn star, 2 years out from that line of work, who knew how to present herself in the right manner, to read to the children. And I think anyone who thinks otherwise is retarded. Am I surprised there was some outcry? No, but I think those people are, generally speaking, close-minded fools.

Sasha's true genius is marketing herself; this story (and this thread) is no exception.

Ok, I laughed at that. :1orglaugh