http://pithhelmet.files.wordpress.co...-paul-cult.jpg

http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lwigwqmFTP1r0lpvf.jpg

ADG

he is a republican. he is running for their nomination for chrissake. thank you for doing your part to support the two party system though.

ROFL :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:thumbsup

You won't even read his views on this subject, yet you keep talking about it.

i read his views. i know what you are getting it. i just think to believe it you have to have a great ability to suspend belief and delude oneself.

His style of argument against it sounds like one of a person who is innocent and being accused of something honestly. :2 cents:

I must have missed the quotes where he said or had some racist shit in his newsletter.. not gonna read all this shit.

That makes no sense at all.

If you're not going to read anything about it then don't comment on it. Isn't that common sense?

It's like a kid going to class and saying "I didn't read the chapter last night, but I'm going to sit here and talk a bunch of shit about it anyways." lol

you people will fall when we rise.

mark my words.

Quite perceptive.

How could you possibly know that?

Birds of a feather. :2 cents:

Random shit that other people wrote over 20 years ago. lol, this isn't even a relevant "scandal."

This is the only so-called dirt that the media has on Ron Paul, so they will continue to beat the horse to death.

Does anyone have any real dirt on Ron Paul? I really doubt it, I know a lot about the man and I've never seen any.

Please post it when you find it though.

let me put it more simply. i understand what you are saying but i think you are delusional.

lol, so what? Pointless comment is pointless.

you misrepresent the facts. either you are lying or ignorant.

what would be a point of ron paul running a newsletter with content that sounds like it comes from david duke's website for over 30 years? why do you think they did that? what is your explanation?

every candidate's past gets run over with a fine toothed comb. while paul's explanation is good enough for his drones the media and large parts of the population just can't believe that he was unaware what was written in the newsletters.

and since he was he should explain himself. which he refuses to do. candidates have been sunk for less, it's no big conspiracy.

If he's such a hardcore racist why can none of you seem to find anything else connecting him to racism?

Shouldn't there be a racist speech somewhere? An article written by him? Something?

Let me know when you find it.

But let me guess, you will only continue to focus on these 20 year old newsletters that he didn't write. lol

When it comes to Ron Paul I like to focus on his consistent record, his loyalty to our constitution, his dedication to liberty and freedom for all. You know, things that actually matter.

If you guys want to obsess over these old ass newsletters that weren't even written by him then go right ahead, that's your right. Enjoy yourselves.

maybe newsletters that he put out for over 30 years under his name and were ghostwritten by people he hired? you should check them out. there is a link to them in this thread.

Do you know what "anything else" means? You keep going back to the same exact thing, the old newsletters.

Please find something else connecting Ron Paul to racism, because I can't find anything.

Like I said, if he's such a big racist it shouldn't be that hard.

how many connections do you need. a newsletter with a consistent racist theme for 30 years seems like a good enough one for most.

if it's not a big deal anyway why does paul refuse to let anyone access to the back issue archives. should be no issue if there is nothing to hide, right?

weve had KLANSMEN in congress for what 50 years and you guys are worried about racists NOW?

L:OLOLOL talk about late.

Freedom is popular, and Ron Paul is legitimately destroying all of his political rivals now to the point that the shadow government (NWO) is getting a little nervous.

First they resort to screaming at the TOP OF THEIR LUNGS that "he can't win!" ..Now he's winning.

The next trick was to limit his air time, and try to silence his voice. Such as happened in the November CBS debate, giving him only 89 seconds. It failed. Polls kept on indicating his steady rise.

Growing increasingly desperate, they resorted to "distancing measures" saying that even if Ron Paul wins in Iowa, "it doesn't count." That they would just ignore the outcome of the primaries if they didn't like the result. ..For good measure, they threw in healthy dose of "Insult" to really persuade the people of Iowa to NOT VOTE FOR RON PAUL. They came out with this little gem .."if you vote for Ron Paul, and Ron Paul wins in Iowa it will discredit the Iowa caucuses."



It's getting so pathetic, it's almost laughable. One failed approach after another.

Nothing is working, what to do???

I know, let's call him a RACIST!! That always works. It worked to silence any opposition to Obama. It will work now. Let's try it..

..So, I guess after all their other gambits failed, the best they can do now is to call him out on something HE DIDN'T WRITE, and attach the "racist" label to him. :1orglaugh

Oh, yeah, he's a racist all right. SO MUCH OF A RACIST that the articles he DID write (as a medical doctor) were WARNING blacks about H.I.V. being a "race specific" bio weapon targeting them!

What's next? I can hardly wait. ...The NWO tactics are really transparent, and honestly, lame. Even children don't fall for such non-sense.

The American people won't be fooled this time. Freedom is popular. :2 cents:

stop the fed and income tax!

o'rly? link? didn't you get the memo that ron paul really didn't write the newsletters? :1orglaugh

We need term limits for Congress.

100% agree. I think limiting it to a total of 6-8 years max service for the house and senate would do wonders for this country.

Yea they are starting to get really desperate. The racist card works pretty well though, unfortunately. The sheep eat that shit up.

Yup.

And before any of these idiots ask the question.... yes, INCLUDING Ron Paul. None of them should be there longer than about 8 years max.

I agree. I would be all for having it be an 8 year max. With you having to get re-elected after 4 years just like the president. After your second term you are done.

StickyGreen, can you honestly say that if it was discovered that Mitt Romney was the Editor of a publication for over 20 years called The Mitt Romney Newsletter, which he made millions of dollars from, that contained vile racist ideology, that you would just brush it off?

ADG

Divide and Conquer.

It's a lot like what goes on around here. We have a bunch of misinformed half-wits (who get globalist talking points rammed into their heads) coming here to argue for THEIR OWN enslavement.

I'm all for alternative points of view, and healthy discourse, but I mean, common people. We all need to see past the football issues, racial division ..etc that are injected into the political narrative to divide and conquer us. They keep running the same plays on us over and over, and we need to at least recognize that.

Holy shit... it speaks! lol

Well no I wouldn't just brush it off, and I don't completely brush off Paul's involvement with his newsletters. He should have been more involved and not allowed people to be hired who would write racist shit. He should have made sure nothing like that would even be released since his name was attached to it, and he has admitted this. People make mistakes in their lives, and this seems to be Ron Paul's worst mistake.

But I have followed Ron Paul very closely since 06 or 07 and I honestly do not believe that he is racist at all. I have read all of his books, seen most of his interviews, and listened to most of his comments at debates... and I have never got the feeling that he is racist. I think he's a great man and a great American.

lol, so true...

If Ron Paul was racist I would not support him, simple as that.

I can't stand racists, I think there is really only one "race" here: the human race.

I want freedom and equality for all, just like Ron Paul does.

how do you explain the good dr. paul used to admit her wrote the columns?

http://reason.com/blog/2008/01/11/ol...d-for-over-a-d

The first time I can find reporting on the controversy is in the May 22, 1996 Dallas Morning News:

Dr. Ron Paul, a Republican congressional candidate from Texas, wrote in his political newsletter in 1992 that 95 percent of the black men in Washington, D.C., are "semi-criminal or entirely criminal."

He also wrote that black teenagers can be "unbelievably fleet of foot." [...]

Dr. Paul, who is running in Texas' 14th Congressional District, defended his writings in an interview Tuesday. He said they were being taken out of context.

"It's typical political demagoguery," he said. "If people are interested in my character ... come and talk to my neighbors." [...]

According to a Dallas Morning News review of documents circulating among Texas Democrats, Dr. Paul wrote in a 1992 issue of the Ron Paul Political Report: "If you have ever been robbed by a black teenaged male, you know how unbelievably fleet of foot they can be."

Dr. Paul, who served in Congress in the late 1970s and early 1980s, said Tuesday that he has produced the newsletter since 1985 and distributes it to an estimated 7,000 to 8,000 subscribers. A phone call to the newsletter's toll-free number was answered by his campaign staff. [...]

Dr. Paul denied suggestions that he was a racist and said he was not evoking stereotypes when he wrote the columns. He said they should be read and quoted in their entirety to avoid misrepresentation. [...]

"If someone challenges your character and takes the interpretation of the NAACP as proof of a man's character, what kind of a world do you live in?" Dr. Paul asked.

In the interview, he did not deny he made the statement about the swiftness of black men.

"If you try to catch someone that has stolen a purse from you, there is no chance to catch them," Dr. Paul said.

He also said the comment about black men in the nation's capital was made while writing about a 1992 study produced by the National Center on Incarceration and Alternatives, a criminal justice think tank based in Virginia.

Citing statistics from the study, Dr. Paul then concluded in his column: "Given the inefficiencies of what DC laughingly calls the criminal justice system, I think we can safely assume that 95 percent of the black males in that city are semi-criminal or entirely criminal."

"These aren't my figures," Dr. Paul said Tuesday. "That is the assumption you can gather from" the report.

May 23, 1996, Houston Chronicle:

Paul, a Republican obstetrician from Surfside, said Wednesday he opposes racism and that his written commentaries about blacks came in the context of "current events and statistical reports of the time." [...]

Paul also wrote that although "we are constantly told that it is evil to be afraid of black men, it is hardly irrational.

Black men commit murders, rapes, robberies, muggings and burglaries all out of proportion to their numbers."

A campaign spokesman for Paul said statements about the fear of black males mirror pronouncements by black leaders such as the Rev. Jesse Jackson, who has decried the spread of urban crime.

Paul continues to write the newsletter for an undisclosed number of subscribers, the spokesman said.

Oct. 11, 1996, Houston Chronicle:

Paul, who earlier this week said he still wrote the newsletter for subscribers, was unavailable for comment Thursday. But his spokesman, Michael Quinn Sullivan, accused Morris of "gutter-level politics."

sounds like a typical lying hypocritical politician to me. ron paul 2012.

Yeah, we need a bunch of n00bs running the country . . . . I swear, you guys act like this is Burning Man.

You don't have to be some kind of rocket scientist to work in government. Just follow the constitution and do what's best for the American people. (lol, imagine that)

lol pretty sure I was arguing in your favor. But what I mean is I didn't see any quotes from Ron Paul or his newsletter where he said something racist.

Shut the fuck up with this NWO, Illuminati, World Currency bullshit. If people who believed in that garbage didn't back him his image wouldn't be so bad to others.

Oh, I suppose you feel qualified. Again, this is not Burning Man or OWS.

Actually no, I don't feel qualified. I said it isn't rocket science, yet it is still preferable to have some formal education in government and law. I majored in business.

Based on your logic alone, Barack Obama isn't a very good president. The guy only had 3 years of experience working in the federal government.

Ron Paul has 21 years of working experience in the federal government. So based on your logic he should be a great president.