GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Daily Mail UK: Raw footage shows Ron Paul DIDN'T storm out of CNN interview over racist newsletters. (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1051296)

dyna mo 12-26-2011 06:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by acrylix (Post 18652526)
dyna mo, your last "flip flop" accusation was proven to be 100% bogus: https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1032142

this is not about me, i am not running for pres.

so stop with the dodge and deflect, and
feel free to point out where ron paul is not flip flopping on being an anti-semitic, homophobic racist in the following post with a letter bearing his signature and 2 interviews showing his embracing the letter then disavowing it.
Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 18652511)
ron paul flip flops on being an anti-semitic, homophobic, racist:

Paul, who leads polls in Iowa leading up to the caucuses there on Jan. 3, published a series of newsletters while he was out of Congress in the 1980s and 1990s called The Ron Paul Political Report, Ron Paul’s Freedom Report, The Ron Paul Survival Report and The Ron Paul Investment Letter.

Some issues of the newsletters included racist, anti-Israel or anti-gay comments, including a 1992 newsletter in which he said 95% of black men in Washington “are semi-criminal or entirely criminal.”

In 1996, Paul told The Dallas Morning News that his comment about black men in Washington came while writing about a 1992 study by the National Center on Incarceration and Alternatives, a criminal justice think tank in Virginia.

Paul cited the study and wrote: “Given the inefficiencies of what DC laughingly calls the criminal justice system, I think we can safely assume that 95 percent of the black males in that city are semi-criminal or entirely criminal.”

“These aren’t my figures,” Paul told the Morning News. “That is the assumption you can gather from the report.”

Nor did Paul dispute in 1996 his 1992 newsletter statement that said,”If you have ever been robbed by a black teenaged male, you know how unbelievably fleet of foot they can be.”




Paul said on CNN Wednesday. “I didn’t write them. I disavow them. That’s it.”




http://oi39.tinypic.com/b5k1h3.jpg
in its entirety here

http://graphics.thomsonreuters.com/1...icitation2.pdf



just for fun, an actual ron paul money bomb advertisment from 1998
http://motherjones.com/files/legacy/...l2008_dees.jpg


Phoenix 12-26-2011 07:10 AM

sure is a lot of talk about Ron Paul...is anyone else running?

you wouldn't know it

JFK 12-26-2011 07:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix (Post 18653188)
sure is a lot of talk about Ron Paul...is anyone else running?

you wouldn't know it

never mind about that, check your $100 bill:winkwink:

dyna mo 12-26-2011 08:06 AM

i've got out-of-town family waking up, i've got to hop so i will leave it at this,

at the very least, i conclude that ron paul, as publisher of that nonsense, might not be a homophobic, anti-semitic racist but he did decide to use that sort of writing as a strategy to sell newsletters. that is an incontrovertible fact.

and that is not the sort of strategist i want running the white house and our government.


happy holiday!

porno jew 12-26-2011 08:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by glamourmodels (Post 18652998)
why put the impetus on me? do your own research lazy fuck

because they were never posted and you are a liar and idiot, robot.

CyberHustler 12-26-2011 08:50 AM

I like a lot of Ron Pauls views but a simple "I'm not sure if I made money off those, I will investigate it" would have been better than the shenanigans... trust is a big issue.

tony286 12-26-2011 09:25 AM

The thing i find interesting is this belief ron paul is this wash dc outsider.when he is a career politician.

Joshua G 12-26-2011 09:28 AM

idiots. stop attacking each other. you may as well argue whether red is the right color for santa claus to wear.

Ron Paul's position on race is meaningless. no black people are going to vote for him anyway. Only a few bluedogs might consider Paul over obama in the general.

as for repubs. this race issue is at the bottom of reasons repubs back their guy. bible belt repubs will vote for whoever they think jesus would vote for. The wall street repubs will go Romney hands down.

I would like to think Paul has a shot. But he has a shit ton of luggage, & the media will never, ever portray him as anything other then a freakshow. & He REQUIRES winning the majority of delegates to get the nom, because he has no shot in hell in a brokered convention.

but the debate is good entertainment. just dont go away hating each other over an irrelevent issue.

tony286 12-26-2011 09:33 AM

Well said Joshgirls

seeandsee 12-26-2011 09:42 AM

this is just for fun RON PAUL IS NEXT PRESIDENT, AMERICAN PEOPLE WILL SEE THAT

glamourmodels 12-26-2011 10:04 AM

This message is hidden because porno jew is on your ignore list.

you say something loser?

glamourmodels 12-26-2011 12:33 PM

I think you are mistaking being an outsider with being uncorrupted

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony286 (Post 18653302)
The thing i find interesting is this belief ron paul is this wash dc outsider.when he is a career politician.


porno jew 12-26-2011 12:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by glamourmodels (Post 18653330)
This message is hidden because porno jew is on your ignore list.

you say something loser?

you are just like your cult leader dr. paul. when then hard questions come out you pout and take our ball home.

glamourmodels 12-26-2011 01:10 PM

Just to be clear I never attack someone for disagreeing with me as long as they are coming from a sincere and thoughtful place. Mudslingers and trolls on the other hand will get flamed without mercy just to clarify my personal position. :-)

Quote:

Originally Posted by joshgirls (Post 18653306)
idiots. stop attacking each other.


AsianDivaGirlsWebDude 12-26-2011 01:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by glamourmodels (Post 18651923)
Ron Paul No Racist: NAACP Austin President

Texas Congressman and presidential candidate Ron Paul is not a racist and is being smeared as one because he is a clear threat to the political establishment, says Nelson Linder, Austin president of the NAACP.

Speaking out against the charges when they first surfaced during the last Republican primary in 2007, Linder said he has personally known Paul for 20 years and heard him speak out against police oppression in minority communities, racial biases in mandatory drug sentencing, and favorably about late civil rights leader Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.

“Knowing Ron Paul’s intent, I think he is trying to improve this country but I think also, when you talk about the Constitution and you constantly criticize the federal government versus state I think a lot of folks are going to misconstrue that [....] so I think it’s very easy for folks who want to to take his position out of context and that’s what I’m hearing,” Linder told talk radio host Alex Jones during an interview on January 13, 2008.

“Knowing Ron Paul and having talked to him, I think he’s a very fair guy I just think that a lot of folks do not understand the Libertarian platform,” he added.

“I’ve read Ron Paul’s whole philosophy, I also understand what he’s saying from a political standpoint and why people are attacking him,” said Linder.

“If you scare the folks that have the money, they’re going to attack you and they’re going to take it out of context,” he added.

“What he’s saying is really really threatening the powers that be and that’s what they fear,” concluded the NAACP President.

Linder echoed his statements during another interview during the same time, with Texas libertarian radio host Scott Horton.

“There are quite a few folks who don’t understand the libertarian philosophy,” Linder said, adding the ideology is one African-Americans should more open to.

“The two-party system has failed America,” he said.

“I hope that more folks in the other parties develop the courage to join him in addressing that, I think, will decide the fate of this country in the future.”

http://www.therightperspective.org/2...tin-president/


For The Record: The NAACP has never defended Ron Paul.

Nelson Linder is the Austin Branch NAACP President, not the President of the NAACP.
Nelson Linder met Ron Paul 20 years ago. He has not known Ron Paul for 20 years.
Nelson Linder never denied the fact the Ron Paul wrote the newsletters. He merely insisted that Ron Paul was taken out of context, but not “Ron Paul’s ghostwriter.”
Nelson Linder does not support or endorse Ron Paul, nor has he ever voted for him. He actually says that he supports Obama in the Alex Jones interview.
But most importantly

Alex Jones has since been forced to write a retraction:

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles...not_racist.htm

“UPDATE: Nelson Linder contacted our office and wanted prisonplanet.com to stress the fact that he made his comments as a private citizen, not as president of the Austin NAACP. He said the libertarian platform deserves the same scrutiny as the Democratic and Republican parties receive in this nation.

He went on to say that some on the web have construed that he is endorsing Ron Paul. And that is not the case. Mr. Linder went on to say that the interview was designed to discuss local issues concerning civil rights and civil liberties and his knowledge of the Libertarian party and Ron Paul.”

So once again, for the record: The NAACP NEVER ISSUED A PRESS RELEASE IN DEFENSE OF RON PAUL.

But you know who actually did?..
http://www.kkk.bz/PRESS%20RELEASronpaul.pdf

Yep! The non-racist folks of the Klu Klux Klan... :helpme

The Paulite spambot propaganda network talking points fly in the face of these facts with regards to Ron Paul and Civil Rights:

FACT: According to the NAACP scorecard, Ron Paul has accrued a record of only 39% on civil rights issues such as affirmative action.

(F = 59% or below)

FACT: According to the NAACP’s most recent civil rights legislative report card for the 112th Congress (2009 – 2010), Ron Paul compiled a dismal 8 percent voting record on issues of interest to the nation’s oldest civil rights organization.

NAACP Scorecard

Ron Paul isn't a white supremacist; He just happens to support them, take their money and advance their goals. But he’s not ONE of them!!! :upsidedow :1orglaugh



ADG

porno jew 12-26-2011 01:48 PM

i find it hard to believe the paulbots would distort, misinterpret and flat out lie about the facts.

uno 12-26-2011 10:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by porno jew (Post 18652538)
well she didn't believe him because he most likely is lying. so she kept pressing.

no one outside of the paulbots believes him, thus why it keeps coming back.

It's not like a lot of his son's statements/interviews/actions mirror that of his father.

uno 12-26-2011 11:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 18653172)
ron paul's biggest liability is not the fact that he's a flip flopping, anti-semitic, homophobic racist.


and no, ron paul's biggest liability is not the fact that he is an opportunist that uses fear to capitalize on and make money from anti-semitic, homophobic racist letters he writes, lke the one posted above, designed to sell newsletters.


no, ron paul's biggest liability are his blind-faith supporters, like the ones in this thread. they turn away more potential ron pal supporters than ron paul does.

Exactly. My wife has been dipping into the conspiracy end of the crazy pool the past 2 months and has really started to like Ron Paul. I explained to her how his ideas would never work, could never be implented, and even if they were, how catastrophic it would be to society. Then I showed her some posts from nutjobs like some in this thread and she saw the light. Yes, he says a lot of great things that make sense, but they would never work. Yes, he's likable. Yes he bucks the establisment.

In the end he's the republican Dennis Kucinich.

uno 12-26-2011 11:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix (Post 18653188)
sure is a lot of talk about Ron Paul...is anyone else running?

you wouldn't know it

Who else would they talk about? Snoozefestx2 of Romney/Newt? Wouldn't have a chance in hell Bachmann or Santorum? That colored fella who had dropped out of the race?

John Huntsman or Gary Johnson? :1orglaugh

Rick Perry? :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

uno 12-26-2011 11:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joshgirls (Post 18653306)
idiots. stop attacking each other. you may as well argue whether red is the right color for santa claus to wear.

That was decided long ago by the free market and Coca-Cola.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:51 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc