GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Why does Webbilling process for rape sites? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1052559)

BIGTYMER 01-06-2012 11:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by porno jew (Post 18674603)
do you know what direct debit means? or are you an expert in billing now as well?

God gets advice from him dude!

OneWhoKnows 01-06-2012 11:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by porno jew (Post 18674603)
do you know what direct debit means? or are you an expert in billing now as well?

It doesn't matter if it's direct debit or credit card billing. You need banks to process direct debit, and if these banks get aware of what they are actually billing for, they will pull the plug without a doubt.

12clicks 01-06-2012 11:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by raymor (Post 18674511)
Interesting. So to most of the people who replied, there is no difference at all between a police drama, where the they try to stop a rapist, and selling something to of get off on the idea of raping women? To me, there is a difference between acknowledging that crime happens versus promoting rape as erotic.

Just as you might watch Law and Order with your family, you're just as comfortable sitting down with dinner and watching a rape porn, where they present a woman screaming in anguish as the best part of a fun Saturday night? That's interesting, if so.

If you think there IS a difference between a drama that mentions a crime having occurred versus promoting the idea of rape as the way to get your rocks off, it might be interesting to ponder just what that difference is.

I think it mignt be that it's ok to have a cop drama and that doesn't necesarily make it ok to promote the idea off rape as being erotic or acceptable.

oh! so its not me getting raped, its some woman?
my bad

TisMe 01-06-2012 11:16 AM

Sorry 12clicks, maybe next time :)

Onewhoknows should have a new nick, onewhoassumes.

How the hell do you know what the bank does or doesn't know?

Onewhoguesses perhaps?

CyberHustler 01-06-2012 11:18 AM

My dick shrunk 2 centimeters from reading this thread... be warned.

raymor 01-06-2012 11:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BIGTYMER (Post 18674546)
Raymor I get your point but people fap to tv/movie rape scenes too. Directed as erotic or not fake rape is fake rape.

They may, but I sure wouldn't promote that. I think promoting fapping to rape is pretty disgusting myself.

Paul Markham 01-06-2012 11:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TisMe (Post 18674608)
Paul, think before you type.

They are NOT using Visa to process this site.

Unlike you I'm a businessman who thinks, and I think that the responsibility that comes with having protected free speech for myself and my business is the obligation to protect the same rights for others, even if their speech makes me ill.

Fantasy is just that, fantasy and even if your own is having a mouse ride a cat while dragging you behind by your testicles, I'll support YOUR right to have that fantasy.

Or me.

I said OK if they don't use Visa or MC. They used to.

http://paulmarkham.com/temp/bill1.jpg

http://paulmarkham.com/temp/bill2.jpg

Then all is fine with Webbilling, it's a bank transfer.

I understand and support your stance on free speech. The problem is that freedom stretches to payment companies. They are free to do business with who they choose. And we all need to be over cautious on this. We all got fucked so many times in the past.

sperbonzo 01-06-2012 11:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by raymor (Post 18674648)
They may, but I sure wouldn't promote that. I think promoting fapping to rape is pretty disgusting myself.

I agree with you. That's why we are free to not view it, or work with it, if we don't want to.

And religious nuts who think the stuff that YOU work with/produce is disgusting, are ALSO free to not produce or view your stuff.



Freedom.

Messy, ain't it?



.:)

OneWhoKnows 01-06-2012 11:38 AM

Well, a statement from a Webbilling rep, regarding if their banks know about the content they process for and they are fine with it, would be nice.

porno jew 01-06-2012 11:40 AM

oh who gives a fuck? different countries and cultures have different ideas on what constitutes porn. it's called moral relativism and it does exist.

Joshua G 01-06-2012 11:46 AM

rape sites fail to deliver. Stupid to ban them, like banning fake weed.

:2 cents:

Kenny B! 01-06-2012 12:08 PM

Surveys have shown 9 out of 10 enjoy gang rape.

blackmonsters 01-06-2012 12:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by raymor (Post 18674511)
Interesting. So to most of the people who replied, there is no difference at all between a police drama, where the they try to stop a rapist, and selling something to of get off on the idea of raping women? To me, there is a difference between acknowledging that crime happens versus promoting rape as erotic.

Just as you might watch Law and Order with your family, you're just as comfortable sitting down with dinner and watching a rape porn, where they present a woman screaming in anguish as the best part of a fun Saturday night? That's interesting, if so.

If you think there IS a difference between a drama that mentions a crime having occurred versus promoting the idea of rape as the way to get your rocks off, it might be interesting to ponder just what that difference is.

I think it mignt be that it's ok to have a cop drama and that doesn't necesarily make it ok to promote the idea off rape as being erotic or acceptable.

The law in the US is basically what you just said.
The fine line between obscenity and art is what it comes down to in court.
If the content focuses on the rape instead of a broader theme then it's going to be
obscenity in most courts. Law And Order focuses on the process of arrest, trial and
conviction. The rape is only there to establish the crime to follow through the process.

It's really a joke when people compare porn scenes with rape and violence to TV
and movie dramas because the movie and TV never focus on the rape and violence as
the sole message of the content, in addition to, the TV/movie rape not even being explicit. The rape scene in TV is 20 seconds; in porn it's 20 minutes!! :1orglaugh

When Law And Order makes an episode with 10 rape scenes one after another with
no arrest and no other message then people can argue about mainstream TV and movies
somehow "getting away with it". Until that time it's truly a stupid argument.

Barry-xlovecam 01-06-2012 12:12 PM

Don't film or distribute "simulated" rape content in the United States -- you can be convicted of federal felony obscenity charges ... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extreme...ty_prosecution

nikki99 01-06-2012 12:27 PM

I remember that thread about a sponsor full of bestiality and everyone start screaming like old virgin ladies, stupid idiots...

nextri 01-06-2012 01:13 PM

A little rape never hurt anyone..

epitome 01-06-2012 02:38 PM

Thank God we are not forced to adhere to other's cultures and taste.

There are so many people in the world absolutely disgusted by pro-choice folks.

Doesn't mean we should ban abortions.

Just because the cow is sacred somewhere doesn't mean the world should stop eating hamburgers.

I personally think arranged marriage is one of the cruelest things in the world. I also respect that there are people who believe in it.

I think scat is disgusting and do not want anything to do with it. I also recognize that others are into it. I certainly wouldn't want to deny them their right.

nextri 01-06-2012 03:19 PM

I personally believe life begins at ejaculation, and everyone who masturbate should be charged with murder..

lyno 01-06-2012 03:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackmonsters (Post 18674735)
When Law And Order makes an episode with 10 rape scenes one after another with no arrest and no other message then people can argue about mainstream TV and movies somehow "getting away with it". Until that time it's truly a stupid
argument.

Is that why everybody who had sex in those older "teenage horror movies"
got brutally slaughtered short after (especially the girls)? So, adding some
primitive, political correct moral wanking to the plot should do the trick. :winkwink:

SASCHA WINKLER 01-06-2012 04:35 PM

If you as a payment comapany not offering / processing MC or VISA, you are also 'not' overviewed by them.

blackmonsters 01-06-2012 04:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lyno (Post 18675051)
Is that why everybody who had sex in those older "teenage horror movies"
got brutally slaughtered short after (especially the girls)? So, adding some
primitive, political correct moral wanking to the plot should do the trick. :winkwink:

Yeah, go for it.

Let me know when you figure out that TV and Mainstream movies don't show dicks in
pussies. Which would be the entire point of why they can do what they do.

baryl 01-06-2012 04:57 PM

Half the scenarios depicted in porn would be illegal if they were real.

Hell, the most disturbing rape scenes I've ever seen in my life were in mainstream films you can view any time on Netflix. (Last House On The Left and Megan is Missing)

blackmonsters 01-06-2012 05:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baryl (Post 18675273)
Hell, the most disturbing rape scenes I've ever seen in my life were in mainstream films you can view any time on Netflix. (Last House On The Left and Megan is Missing)

And how many dicks went into pussies that you saw on screen?

Just a "minor point in the fine print" type question.

:helpme

moeloubani 01-06-2012 05:22 PM

funny how a guy with teens and young in his domain names complains about webbilling working with sites that say rape

raymor 01-06-2012 05:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by porno jew (Post 18674683)
it's called moral relativism and it does exist.

The interesting thing about normative moral relativism is that it so clearly contradicts itself. The moral relativist says "you shouldn't judge what other people should or shouldn't do, because each person has their own standards."

Note the contradiction - "you shouldn't say what others shouldn't do". If moral relativism is correct, that I shouldn't say what one should do, then it's also incorrect because it says you shouldn't say that I shouldn't say that. Moral relativism rules itself to be wrong.

baryl 01-06-2012 05:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackmonsters (Post 18675319)
And how many dicks went into pussies that you saw on screen?

Just a "minor point in the fine print" type question.

:helpme

I don't see any difference; they're both simulated rape.
I don't spend too much time watching rape porn because I find it vile and disgusting but what I've briefly seen is much tamer than both of those films I mentioned. Especially Megan is Missing which graphically depicts for about 20 straight minutes a 13 y/o girl being brutally raped and buried alive. That movie may be those most fucked up thing I've ever witnessed and you can fire that up on your Nintendo Wii any time.

RRRED 01-06-2012 06:01 PM

I'm not sure why a thread about rape made me laugh out loud at least 5 times...

Man, I missed this place! :thumbsup

livexxx 01-06-2012 06:40 PM

I'm watching a Steven Seagal film and he has gone way past that and is killing people.

EukerVoorn 01-06-2012 08:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OneWhoKnows (Post 18673891)
Well, actually I always thought webbilling is a respected and serious company, but when I saw this I just thought WTF!

So they are actually billing for a website like CruelNetwork which has nice sub-sites with names like "Brutally Raped", "Force Her", "Family Violation" and so on. I don't know about you, but certainly I wouldn't want to work with a company that has no prob processing for shit like that, not even as alternative billing solution.

Have you checked that rape content? A lot is fake. I worry more about Visa, MasterCard and PayPal secretly processing for bestiality and child pornography.

Konda 01-06-2012 08:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by moeloubani (Post 18675320)
funny how a guy with teens and young in his domain names complains about webbilling working with sites that say rape


Typical US folks, if it's illegal in the US, it should be illegal anywhere and you should be against it. But if it was legal int he US they would all promote it.

Konda 01-06-2012 08:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DoubleT (Post 18674477)
I am sure the banking partners would be thrilled to see this sort of content passing through their processing partners gateways. Conservative grey haired German bankers love the thought of making a few extra euro enabling processing for "Brutally Raped", "Force Her" and "Family Violation". :winkwink:

Why would they care. It's legal in Germany, and many other countries in the world.
People can just run into a porn shop and buy a rape DVD and pay with their same bank card.

This is Webbilling, they process for EU debit cards. This content is legal in the EU.

There should be no other discussion about morals, everyone here works in PORN, everyone has different morals, but that doesn't mean everyone just have to follow YOUR morals.

baryl 01-06-2012 09:33 PM

Actually I don't think it's illegal in the US. It is however illegal in Germany and England (at least according to Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_pornography
It's mostly just considered distasteful and many don't want to be associated with it.

porno jew 01-06-2012 09:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EukerVoorn (Post 18675516)
Have you checked that rape content? A lot is fake.

no shit sherlock.

blackmonsters 01-06-2012 09:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by porno jew (Post 18675600)
no shit sherlock.

:1orglaugh

anexsia 01-06-2012 10:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baryl (Post 18675340)
I don't see any difference; they're both simulated rape.
I don't spend too much time watching rape porn because I find it vile and disgusting but what I've briefly seen is much tamer than both of those films I mentioned. Especially Megan is Missing which graphically depicts for about 20 straight minutes a 13 y/o girl being brutally raped and buried alive. That movie may be those most fucked up thing I've ever witnessed and you can fire that up on your Nintendo Wii any time.

Ever seen Irreversible? Or hell, there's I Spit On Your Grave too, I would say both of those are worse then the simulated rape scenes portrayed on some of these porn sites.

blackmonsters 01-06-2012 10:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baryl (Post 18675340)
I don't see any difference; they're both simulated rape.
I don't spend too much time watching rape porn because I find it vile and disgusting but what I've briefly seen is much tamer than both of those films I mentioned. Especially Megan is Missing which graphically depicts for about 20 straight minutes a 13 y/o girl being brutally raped and buried alive. That movie may be those most fucked up thing I've ever witnessed and you can fire that up on your Nintendo Wii any time.

And highlighted above is exactly the anti-porn argument.

"People get to the point where they are incapable of seeing the difference".

The difference is huge, accepting the difference and viewing the material is not the
same as viewing the material and not seeing the difference.

When you see no difference then you obviously are not even comparing the
work environment nor are you considering the impact of the environment on
the worker. You don't give a shit about a porn stars feelings, emotions or fear
of the work place or their right to work in a reasonable environment.

Nobody is shooting mainstream Hollywood movies with rape scenes while 5 guys
off camera jerk off to the scene so they can "add loads" to the cum shot.

You might do a mainstream movie part where you get ass raped in prison and
have no problem with the simulated ass rape. But if the director says "We want
this more realistic so, we won't show dick on camera but, you guys go ahead and
shove it in his ass". I bet you'll see the difference then.

barcodes 01-06-2012 10:47 PM


Joshua G 01-06-2012 10:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackmonsters (Post 18675620)
When you see no difference then you obviously are not even comparing the work environment nor are you considering the impact of the environment on the worker. You don't give a shit about a porn stars feelings, emotions or fear of the work place or their right to work in a reasonable environment.

sorry dude. most rape content is not produced by forcing innocent girls to take it in the ass, or else. The rape genre is 90% standard fare with bad setup, a few slaps, & a tattooed cock whore badly pretending she dont like it. In addition, many bondage sites make it quite obvious at the end of the scene that the content was consensual.

you are referring to a handful of producers who con & coerce their talent into extreme sex they didnt intend to do. These producers attempt to capture, in essence, real rape. That type of scene is found in numerous genres. Those who like that stuff know where to find it, & its not by searching for rape on google.

:upsidedow

Just Alex 01-06-2012 10:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EukerVoorn (Post 18675516)
Have you checked that rape content? A lot is fake.

Monsieur, you're one big fucking french idiot.

anexsia 01-06-2012 10:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Just Alex (Post 18675639)
Monsieur, you're one big fucking french idiot.

:1orglaugh


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:23 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc