seriously your using kevin smith success to justify the exact opposite position of KEVIN SMITH

http://usdish.com/celebutaunt/19-sop...om-celebrities

and your arguing i am presenting a narrative

he has repeatedly complained about how hollywood accounting caused 36k movie (clerks) not to turn a profit.


When you uses his success to argue in favor of the opposite position of the artist

you should fucking care

why don't you ask Kevin smith what he thinks of you using his success with red state as a way to discredit a complaint about Hollywood accounting.

that's funny you think a 30 grand movie that grossed 3 mil didn't make him any profit. not funny ha ha.

clerks was one of the most profitable films of all time. hollywood and the machine as it is has made him a a lot of money.

guess what? his shit sucks now. all the movies he churns out are crap. that is why he is flailing now.

read what i said

i said

he has repeatedly complained about how hollywood accounting caused 36k movie (clerks) not to turn a profit.

i didn't say it NEVER turned a profit

it took seven years for clerks to turn a profit

he repeatedly complained about

he still talks about how Hollywood accounting kills projects because actor who would take profit sharing to get a project off the ground don't because they know proft sharing is basically agreeing to take it up the ass.

btw if you didn't figure it out the 7 fucking years period was way after.

The movie didn't make a cent of profit in the theater.

get someone in your group home to read that back to you.

that is literally insane.

doesn't change the fact that i am right and your wrong

clerks didn't turn a penny of profit on their 3 million box office

it didn't turn a profit until 6.5 years after the movie left theaters

and for all of those 6 years he complained about

when it finally turned a profit he complained about how insane it was that movie that only cost 25k to make didn't turn a profit until 6.5 years after it left the theater.