GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Entitlement vs Self-Attribution Fallacy (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1055399)

epitome 02-01-2012 12:38 AM

I don't disagree that there are worker bees and they are happy with that. I saw my Mom always excel in every management job she had and tried to push her to open her own business but she was happy with working for someone else.

There are also different personalities at the senior management level. If I owned a big company I would hire a CEO and assume the COO position. I am less interested in coming up with the big picture and more interested in building efficient systems. I would make the COO position as powerful as the CEO position (some companies do that) but I prefer being told where we are going and then figure out how to get there.

Shotsie 02-01-2012 12:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by u-Bob (Post 18724011)
It's impossible to "level the playing field" simply because we are all individuals. We are all different. And we all grow up in different environments. We all grow up amongst people who are individuals themselves (and thus all different). Every individual has his own strengths and weaknesses, goals, hopes, dreams, fears, preferences, abilities etc.

Some see opportunities where others don't. Some like to eat hamburgers, others prefer steak. Some like expensive jewelry, others prefer shells from the beach. Some like working outdoors, other hate the rain/wind/cold. Some like to spend a lot of time with their families, others prefer to focus on other things. Some like to travel and explore the world, others prefer to stay at home.

The whole egalitarian notion of equality and leveling the playing field either ignores some of the basic facts of life or is an excuse used by envious people to commit heinous acts of aggression.

Or as Rothbard put it:

The diversity of mankind is a basic postulate of our knowledge of human beings. But if mankind is diverse and individuated, then how can anyone propose equality as an ideal? Every year, scholars hold Conferences on Equality and call for greater equality, and no one challenges the basic tenet. But what justification can equality find in the nature of man? If each individual is unique, how else can he be made 'equal' to others than by destroying most of what is human in him and reducing human society to the mindless uniformity of the ant heap?
-Murray N. Rothbard

What does any of that have to do with providing basic needs for people like education, housing, food, clothes, etc.?

epitome 02-01-2012 12:45 AM

As a sidenote:

I am reading Warren Buffets biography right now. I never realized he was a congressman's son. I always thought he was somebody that came from nothing.

He was a privileged kid. Not from a wealthy family from what I can tell, but they had amazing connections.

Anybody can make something of themselves, but a lot of people do have doors opened for them.

While anybody determined enough can open the doors for themselves, I think you get further faster if someone is opening them for you.

u-Bob 02-01-2012 04:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shotsie (Post 18724903)
What does any of that have to do with providing basic needs for people like education, housing, food, clothes, etc.?

Unless they somehow managed to abolish scarcity and there are now unlimited supplies of iron, bricks, steel, wood, cotton,..., vegetables, meat and teachers that are willing to work for free, your statement implies that you are OK with the state taking away the property of some (people who have earned it) to give it away to others.

Not only is that an act of aggression, from an economic point of view it also leads to a destruction of capital in society.

DamageX 02-01-2012 04:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by u-Bob (Post 18725069)
Unless they somehow managed to abolish scarcity and there are now unlimited supplies of iron, bricks, steel, wood, cotton,..., vegetables, meat and teachers that are willing to work for free, your statement implies that you are OK with the state taking away the property of some (people who have earned it) to give it away to others.

Not only is that an act of aggression, from an economic point of view it also leads to a destruction of capital in society.

Seriously man, why do you even bother? The vast majority of the people on here hardly understand the mere words you're saying, much less the entire posts. I know you're trying to enlighten some, but seriously, you can only expect so much understanding from monkeys.

Shotsie 02-01-2012 04:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by u-Bob (Post 18725069)
your statement implies that you are OK with the state taking away the property of some (people who have earned it) to give it away to others.

Yes, that is what I believe, and that is what has been proven to work. Not all that theoretical mises bullshit.

Shotsie 02-01-2012 04:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DamageX (Post 18725076)
Seriously man, why do you even bother? The vast majority of the people on here hardly understand the mere words you're saying, much less the entire posts. I know you're trying to enlighten some, but seriously, you can only expect so much understanding from monkeys.

Oh, I understand him perfectly. I just don't agree. There's a difference, you know.

stocktrader23 02-01-2012 04:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by u-Bob (Post 18725069)
your statement implies that you are OK with the state taking away the property of some (people who have earned it) to give it away to others.

Not only is that an act of aggression, from an economic point of view it also leads to a destruction of capital in society.

As he should be and you are too. Did you pay for the road in front of your house? Do you care to refund poor people that can't afford a car but still pay for your road? Just one example out of too many to mention, please take my money and build a better society. :2 cents:



Quote:

Originally Posted by DamageX (Post 18725076)
Seriously man, why do you even bother? The vast majority of the people on here hardly understand the mere words you're saying, much less the entire posts. I know you're trying to enlighten some, but seriously, you can only expect so much understanding from monkeys.

We understand the words fine, they are just wrong.

12clicks 02-01-2012 04:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stocktrader23 (Post 18724888)
If 12clicks was born a poor kid in Africa he'd still have grown up to be a moderately wealthy, white has been in America. :)

Seriously folks, a shit ton of success is based on pure fucking luck.

Ah yes, the "luck" excuse of the unaccomplished.

BlackCrayon 02-01-2012 05:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by raymor (Post 18724093)
In my opinion, using English will help you get ahead. You may think it doesn't matter if you write sentences or not. Yet, the people who get rich are people who take care to do it right - to write actual sentences . If you're not rich, try doing what they do.



We never no the long term effects of one specific instance of a specific decision. With hundreds of small decisions made every day, that's not what matters, though. PRINCIPLES matter. For example, we don't know WHEN we'll have a car accident. However, we know that always wearing a seatbelt and driving safely is smart. The construction guys who went on to own a successful construction company probably didn't know which people would turn out to be important customers, but they knew that by treating all people fairly would be good for their business in the long run.

Sorry professor. Please don't knock me down to a C. Aren't you the guy who thinks going to college is the way to success? If that was the case 70% of the young population would be successful, including those dirty educated hippies in the occupy movement. Most of the very rich did not do so well in school and did not find it very important. I can write much better if i took my time but I don't in such cases as long as i can get my ideas across, thats all that matters to me.

And as for small decisions...everything can be traced back. I wouldn't be working online if i didn't get into trouble with the law and was forced by law to not hang out with my friends and needed something else to do. I would never of known how much money there was to be made in adult if not for an email someone i didn't even know sent me after signing up to their mainstream free hosting. Hell if my dad wasn't friends with a guy who was so into computers maybe i never would of had the internet in my home to have the chance to do any of that until much later. Its all connected. None of this was a conscious decision towards anything but its part of what took me to a place where i was working for myself and making much more money than my peers.

u-Bob 02-01-2012 06:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shotsie (Post 18725083)
Yes, that is what I believe, and that is what has been proven to work. Not all that theoretical mises bullshit.

If the state has the right to take away your property, then by definition it is not your property. If you do not have the right to own property, then by definition you are not a free man, but a serf.

CaptainHowdy 02-01-2012 06:10 AM

I'm too grand for this thread ...

u-Bob 02-01-2012 06:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stocktrader23 (Post 18725087)
Did you pay for the road in front of your house?

Yes I did. I paid to be connected to the sewerage system. I paid for the 120 meters of cable to be connected to the cable network. I paid the contractor that turned the old dirt road that connects my property to the 'public road' into a 'proper asphalt road'. etc

Barefootsies 02-01-2012 06:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by raymor (Post 18724877)
Better though if first you stop getting your "facts" from Coast to Coast AM.

I have no idea what Coast to Coast AM is, however it sounds like something you would listen to. Additionally, considering your polarized, one sided, political views of the world with a touch of Republican fodder, I doubt there is much 'intelligence' on your end to contribute to a balanced discussion. That being said, I always enjoy a good chuckle when people discount actual history, easily verifiable, just because they do not agree with the facts.

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackCrayon (Post 18725156)
Sorry professor. Please don't knock me down to a C. Aren't you the guy who thinks going to college is the way to success? If that was the case 70% of the young population would be successful, including those dirty educated hippies in the occupy movement. Most of the very rich did not do so well in school and did not find it very important.

Hold your horses right there chief!! You do not want to confuse raymor with facts. He might say you get them from NPR, PBS or something. :winkwink: :winkwink:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 18722411)
Some people are just downright focused on working and moving ahead. They work 24 hours a day 7 days a week. And then the majority (the 99% if you will) are all working for the weekend and can't wait for the end of the workday on Monday through Friday and pretty much fuck off at work most of the day.

Human nature I suppose. There are "leaders" and there are "followers" and that's just the way it is.

Amen BROmance. :thumbsup

12clicks 02-01-2012 07:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stocktrader23 (Post 18725087)
As he should be and you are too. Did you pay for the road in front of your house? Do you care to refund poor people that can't afford a car but still pay for your road?

poor people who can't afford a car are NOT paying for anyone's road. Or much else for that matter.

raymor 02-01-2012 07:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackCrayon (Post 18725156)
Sorry professor. Please don't knock me down to a C. Aren't you the guy who thinks going to college is the way to success? If that was the case 70% of the young population would be successful, including those dirty educated hippies in the occupy movement.

No, I didn't finish school myself, though I may well go back. I've wanted to be an attorney since I was a little kid, because I love to argue. :) What I said is that most millionaires work at learning so they can advance - either learning in school or on the job. If you're successful in this business, I imagine you invested a lot of time and effort learning.

Quote:

Most of the very rich did not do so well in school and did not find it very important.
The average millionaire reads two non-fiction books per month. The average non-millionaire, one per year. Rich people get and stay rich by educating themselves. (Aside, possibly, from the very few in Hollywood.)

Quote:

I can write much better if i took my time but I don't in such cases as long as i can get my ideas across, thats all that matters to me.
I understand that and probably shouldn't have said anything. That said, HUNDREDS of potential business associates are reading this thread and from it learning who we are.

Quote:

And as for small decisions...everything can be traced back. I wouldn't be working online if i didn't get into trouble with the law and was forced by law to not hang out with my friends and needed something else to do. I would never of known how much money there was to be made in adult if not for an email someone i didn't even know sent me after signing up to their mainstream free hosting. Hell if my dad wasn't friends with a guy who was so into computers maybe i never would of had the internet in my home to have the chance to do any of that until much later. Its all connected. None of this was a conscious decision towards anything but its part of what took me to a place where i was working for myself and making much more money than my peers.
Maybe you wouldn't be working online, maybe you would have gotten here via a different path. In order to be successful in this industry, with this much competition, you invested a lot of time and effort into learning. You invested time, effort, and probably money into building your business. You took smart risks. You built relationships. As that kind of person, willing to do those things, you were eventually going to succeed at whatever you were doing.

If you don't already know that the work you invested and the smart risks you take matter, don't work the rest of the week. It doesn't matter whether you work or not, right? It's all luck?

You are working this week, and probably choosing to put off buying things you want, like that new car, in order to invest in your business for long term success. Other, less successful people are spending their paycheck on rims while you invest yours in content. I think you're making better decisions.

PR_Glen 02-01-2012 07:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stocktrader23 (Post 18724888)
If 12clicks was born a poor kid in Africa he'd still have grown up to be a moderately wealthy, white has been in America. :)

Seriously folks, a shit ton of success is based on pure fucking luck. What family were you born into, what opportunities did you have, who did you meet along the way that loaned you some knowledge, etc. Hard work and street smarts can do a lot but neither guarantee you will make great money. Too many factors, way too many.

If you want to see the idiotic attitudes here in fast forward go keep an eye on hot shot poker players. They win for 6 months or a year and think they are so much smarter than everyone then those darn statistics kick in and you never see them win shit again. With millions of people fighting to be successful you will have some that can't lose on pure luck, some that are really brilliant, some that work hard and it works and most that get where they are from a combination of the three.

Even what Robbie says, true to an extent. But his millionaire ass is nobody to the billionaires that also think they are thousands of times smarter than everyone else. To them he is as poor and stupid as the guy working at McDonalds.

Standard deviation, look it up.

if you keep putting yourself in positions of opportunity you create your own luck. You can't hit a homerun if you don't show up to the ball park.

Since when does someone have to be a billionaire to be considered successful? Or to be satisfied? Both my parents have been working class types their whole lives. They found decent jobs early and stuck with it. In their eyes they had no need to want or do more than that. Sure they would have taken more money if they were given it but they would have just spent it on my brother and I, or maybe we would have traveled a bit more, but I assure you they don't feel left out of the picture because they weren't millionaires.

I personally want more than that and I'm pushing hard to get there, but I don't need a billion dollars to do it I assure you--and i can give a rats ass what any billionaire thinks of me. Why should anyone?

Barefootsies 02-01-2012 09:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PR_Glen (Post 18725328)
if you keep putting yourself in positions of opportunity you create your own luck.


"Chance favors the prepared mind" fine sire.

:2 cents:

u-Bob 02-01-2012 09:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barefootsies (Post 18725583)
"Chance favors the prepared mind" fine sire.

:2 cents:

I find that the harder I work, the more luck I seem to have.
Thomas Jefferson

pornguy 02-01-2012 10:34 AM

In the silliest and stupidest old saying is the truth on a road to riches.

if life gives you lemons, Make lemon aid.

Take the lemons and sell lemon aid.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:00 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc