![]() |
here's a thought. I actually TRUST companies that get emotional about things like trademark and reputation and don't just handle it totally professionally but go off the handle for a moment. WHY? cause it's personal and a matter of pride in their company and who they are. The good ones come back down to earth quickly, but it shows they are human and actually CARE, when you think about it.
People who are 'all business, all professional image 100% of the time' scare me. I keep thinking they're out to fuck me. Usually they are...... |
what is your trademark that covers exclusive right to the term "homegrown" in adult ?
|
Quote:
Generic? In the adultspace? Dude, if I saw a "Homegrown" food processor I would think..well...Odd Brand extension, but go Far-L. :2 cents: |
Quote:
|
what's a "homegrown video" anyway? You can't grow a video. I think the name is pretty stupid, actually.
|
Quote:
Quote:
Do you remember our copyright and trademark issues, when someone infringed our rights? Probably not, because we didn't come in here calling you a pompous, ignorant goofball. We made some phone calls and handled our business like - well, business people. |
Quote:
|
Haha, amazing how many people are against homegrown on this. Really? Homegrownamateurs people. Pretty damn obvious that it's infringing and they are required to protect it even if they don't want to.
|
Quote:
Homegrown Video would argue that "Homegrown", when applied to porn, is meaningless except as a brand. The OP would argue that "homegrown" means the same thing as "homemade", so it's merely descriptive of homemade porn. Both would have reasonable arguments, so it would come down to evidence presented about how well known the brand is, etc. It could even be affected by the fact that the judge is a human and if one party was a complete asshat the judge might want to find a way to rule against them. It's happened more than once. |
It's pretty easy to throw out any talk on a message board in a court. But none the less... interesting reading.
Here is my stance... homegrown (original) should offer homegrown (trademark infringer) a sweet ass revshare deal to promote homegrown. Make sense? |
Quote:
|
I support HomeGrown in this case as I think its a pretty obvious one.
But god damn FarL get off the board already lol |
The only thing I don't understand is why Homegrown didn't reg the domain?
Seems like an oversight on there part..... |
there is another trademark for "homegrown" in the entertainment category,
not owned by "homegrown video" but same category as "homegrown video" " Word Mark HOMEGROWN Goods and Services IC 038. US 100 101 104. G & S: Entertainment, namely, broadcasting of radio shows in the field of gardening; and entertainment services, namely, audio streaming and electronic transmission of entertainment media content in the field of gardening. FIRST USE: 20011001. FIRST USE IN COMMERCE: 20011001 IC 041. US 100 101 107. G & S: Entertainment, namely, production of radio shows in the field of gardening; entertainment services, namely, providing a radio program in the field of gardening via a global computer network. FIRST USE: 20011001. FIRST USE IN COMMERCE: 20011001"" By this alone it tells me no one has exclusive right to "homegrown" in the entertainment field. As there are at least 2 companies in the entertainment category with words "homegrown" in it. i dont know, this might not be an open and shut case |
Ok, back from my hockey game; some of the piss and vinegar has been knocked out of me.
To anyone that was offended that I came here to defend against challenges to our trademark, I am deeply sorry. I was posting on this board when a good pissing match was still considered marketing. I know some of you posting here were not around then so you probably don't know how to deal with it. Hopefully you will accept my apology but if not then we certainly can agree to disagree and let bygones be bygones. Even as unpleasant as this may be, we are completely obligated to staunchly defend our brand. That might make me come off like whatever names I have been called here, but seriously, Stocktrader23 actually read our notice and said it was the nicest he has ever seen - because we do offer reasonable and mutually profitable alternative to anything harsh. We would much rather work with people than have to go after them. Now, this is a fact: Homegrown Video was literally the first company to distribute authentic homemade sex videos. PERIOD. That name is now literally synonymous with "homemade adult videos" and that is because of the effort we put into making it so. We have a trademark (#2651798) and anyone is welcome to read it, better yet, have an IP attorney take a look and ask his or her opinion. |
Simple answer.
Can icymelon afford to take this to court with a high chance of losing? If he can, go for it, if not settle quickly. IM what has your lawyer advised? |
Quote:
You don't have an axe to grind do you? Nothing from the past that you would like to share? Come on, get it out and you will feel a whole lot better... |
Quote:
On a side note though, talk on a message board is often used in court both for and against people and Judges don't necessarily disregard it, even if it did come from a board called "GFY". In fact, oftentimes it provides very clear motive and intent and can be highly pertinent to consideration of damages. Just saying... and I know there are some on this board that will attest to it from personal experience. :winkwink: |
Quote:
worked out how? Did you offer payment to buy the domain? I'm confused |
Clear case of infringement.
Folks need to learn how to use uspto.gov before spewing about a subject they know nothing about. Edit: if you don't think this is an infringement, try to start a real estate company called RE/MAX Homes and see how far you get with their attorneys. |
Quote:
Is this your domain? |
Quote:
You can name a price if you want. We would of course pay a fair price for it. Of course, your idea of fair, my idea of fair, and what we would have to spend to get ICANN to resolve it would all have to be weighed together. |
Farrell,
To be clear, you're going after "homegrown" and not "homemade" correct? |
Quote:
Also I noticed your trademark is for "Homegrown Video" not "Homegrown" or "Homegrown Amateurs" If you can claim "Homegrown" from having a trademark on "Homegrown Video" are you gonna try for "Video" next? |
Its a big fucking internet, I dont think "Homegrown Video" should own the term "homegrown" :2 cents:
They may own the term "Homegrown Video" but you can't blame them for trying to twist arms to get anything with "Homegrown" in it. They are probably just taking advice of their overpaid lawyers who only make money when they sue and have to send out letters. It's dog eat dog out here on the internet! EDIT: just read the rest of the thread so edit was in order. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
You seriously show lack of understanding about trademark. Read the mark and it makes it pretty clear. I guess ICANN agrees because everytime we have had to go to them about a domain we have prevailed. End of story. You can quick speculating and acting like you know what you are talking about. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
You whining about it and busting our chops over it is not going to change that. Sorry. |
Lol there's a whole lot of stupid in this thread...
You guys need to read up on trademark law |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I don't understand how a group of seasoned webmasters can't see how obvious this is.
Homegrown is trademarked where adult material is concerned. Cut and dry. |
wowza..that sukcs
|
Quote:
I hope they take it. Willful infringement in a trademark dispute is so worth it, especially in a situation like this, our attorneys literally start salivating. It is disgusting. You literally have to watch where you step. |
Quote:
"Homegrown Videos" is. |
Quote:
In fact, I don't think anyone outside the industry has any idea about this "trademark" and I think it would be pretty difficult to prove that Joe Surfer was ever bamboozled into joining the OP's free site while trying to purchase goods from Homegrown Video. Yeah I don't know alot about the legal angles, but I am pretty sure the precedents that exist, are there because too many people have rolled over under threat of costly litigation and the legal system has been abused to allow this kind of legal extortion and anti-competetive practices. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:53 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc