GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Being a good businessman (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1060482)

jimmycooper 03-09-2012 04:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 18812901)
I'm writing it at the moment. Done the part of touring Europe during the late 60s, skipped the early 70s when I was out of porn and just went straight to the part where we were nearly bankrupt and I started back in porn.

In the first couple of weeks we were earning above the average weekly wage from our porn sales. On top of my other work. Slow start. Sort of mole hill to a big hill type of story. Never became a mountain. But never claimed to be.

I wasn't in Staines.

Still waiting for an intelligent reply from someone.


TheSquealer 03-09-2012 05:04 PM

Those that can, do.

Those that can't, teach.

Jakez 03-09-2012 10:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xholly (Post 18812721)
you shot for magazines? I didn't realize, what was that like, how much you get paid?

:1orglaugh He really fell for this one. Love you Paul.

Roald 03-09-2012 11:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xholly (Post 18812721)
you shot for magazines? I didn't realize, what was that like, how much you get paid?

:1orglaugh nice :thumbsup

anexsia 03-09-2012 11:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bm bradley (Post 18813224)
all gay with condoms and hazmat suits

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh how much would you charge to make some gay hazmat content???

Paul Markham 03-10-2012 01:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Roald (Post 18814533)
:1orglaugh nice :thumbsup

Yes there were far better payers for content in offline than online porn. The only way to make big money as a shooter in online porn was to put your content onto your own sites. Selling it to sponsors exclusive paid shit money. Unlike traffic they were not willing to pay decent amounts fr content. So few if any were brought over as in-house or content production heads. Online simply couldn't or wouldn't compete on the payment level. Why is the question.

This doesn't apply to just me, it applies to most of the offline shooters of any worth. Even when offline porn was reduced to a side show how many of the offline shooters are coming over to produce a great product? Yes very few.

Yet we all know great content converts. Met Art, FTV, PG, etc. We all know the sites that convert well, retain longer ad get members coming back. And we all now the sites that are just not good enough, converting badly, retaining badly and need more traffic to earn the same. There's another difference, the latter don't need to spend mega bucks promoting themselves, the former did. And became the "bros" of affiliates.

Shap went part of the way to create a good site, he could of gone further and created a great site. Yes he made a good return, he could of made a great return. As a content producer I reviewed his site's content. I found sets that would never get published in a magazine, some by the so called top dog here. simply not enough poses, not the right poses, not the right looks off the model and on some it seemed getting a light in the background to glow was more important than getting the picture of the model right. The shooter makes excuses why he didn't do much magazine work. The truth is obvious to someone who got a lot of magazine work published.

And before the idiots talk about me shooting 80s style or for magazines that are now gone. We shot solo girl sets worth $3,000. Custom paid $500 a set and video. Maybe Twistys paid more, ATK paid less. So did a lot of other sponsors.

The big accusation, until I slam dunked it, was offline porn didn't understand the Internet and come here to make more money. Well it's a two way street. Online porn was simply clueless about offline porn and didn't go there to make more money. The excuses for this failing are usually stupid, couldn't be bothered, didn't have the time, etc. That's not good business practices. You eventually went to get stands at the Venus show. 5-6 years to late, in your defense how many other online porn companies did the same?

The media coverage of the "Bang Bus" in a offline porn show might of paid for the outlay, meeting customers face to face always will. But people have to get out of their little boxes to see what's outside to view the opportunities.

Paul Markham 03-10-2012 01:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by travs (Post 18813197)
I still don't get it why Paul Markham appears to be the guy that's most trolled here in GFY

Because I put up threads and posts that the best reply is showing that I'm older than them. Or as they tap on their keyboard from home, trying to pay the rent. Like to imagine I'm as broke as they are. While they play "Big Dog".

Paul Markham 03-10-2012 01:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fletch XXX (Post 18813210)
think of this Paul, in 1977 did you think I would be here in 2012 making apps with your content?

For that matter, in 1977, I was less than 1 year of age, and had no idea 35 years later id be making apps with your content.

technology rules.

No. in the mid 90s I had decided to retire to Thailand. Not for the whores, I just loved the people and country. I had made enough, owned the apartment in London and with my saved money, could of lived comfortably. Flying the occasional girl out to Thailand to shoot on the beaches.

Then Eva walked into my life and I fell head over hills in love, like her, and my life suddenly took a huge detour. Eva had come to me for a casting so she earn enough to go back to Czech, her present boyfriend who she lived with had made her pay for the food, her savings were gone and a few hundred pounds would do the trick. 13+years later I did something in 1997, I was swearing I wouldn't do. Set up a new life in the center of Europe, have a family and a dog and live in a quiet village outside Brno. Instead of on or near a quiet beach in Thailand. Carried on working, started a new business, expanded more in the sector of online porn and grew an entirely new career.

And never regretted a single second of it. :thumbsup

Roald 03-10-2012 01:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 18814581)
It is a long established fact that a reader will be distracted by the readable content of a page when looking at its layout. The point of using Lorem Ipsum is that it has a more-or-less normal distribution of letters, as opposed to using 'Content here, content here', making it look like readable English. Many desktop publishing packages and web page editors now use Lorem Ipsum as their default model text, and a search for 'lorem ipsum' will uncover many web sites still in their infancy. Various versions have evolved over the years, sometimes by accident, sometimes on purpose (injected humour and the like).

There are many variations of passages of Lorem Ipsum available, but the majority have suffered alteration in some form, by injected humour, or randomised words which don't look even slightly believable. If you are going to use a passage of Lorem Ipsum, you need to be sure there isn't anything embarrassing hidden in the middle of text.

All the Lorem Ipsum generators on the Internet tend to repeat predefined chunks as necessary, making this the first true generator on the Internet. It uses a dictionary of over 200 Latin words, combined with a handful of model sentence structures, to generate Lorem Ipsum which looks reasonable. The generated Lorem Ipsum is therefore always free from repetition, injected humour, or non-characteristic words etc.

Contrary to popular belief, Lorem Ipsum is not simply random text. It has roots in a piece of classical Latin literature from 45 BC, making it over 2000 years old. Richard McClintock, a Latin professor at Hampden-Sydney College in Virginia, looked up one of the more obscure Latin words, consectetur, from a Lorem Ipsum passage, and going through the cites of the word in classical literature, discovered the undoubtable source.

Lorem Ipsum comes from sections 1.10.32 and 1.10.33 of "de Finibus Bonorum et Malorum" (The Extremes of Good and Evil) by Cicero, written in 45 BC. This book is a treatise on the theory of ethics, very popular during the Renaissance. The first line of Lorem Ipsum, "Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet..", comes from a line in section 1.10.32.

I agree :2 cents:

papill0n 03-10-2012 01:37 AM

yes paul !

DamianJ 03-10-2012 02:27 AM

Fiddy posts by Paul saying the same old shit about how great he is and how everyone else is an idiot.

Still, it's the weekend now, the only time in the week Paul gets to see his wife and kid so I am sure he will be spending as much time as poss with them and not arguing with people he despises on the internet.

Paul Markham 03-10-2012 02:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tonyparra (Post 18813833)
Paul likes to write. I hate writing, he could do my blog post for me. We would make $$

Hit me up and we can talk.

Paul Markham 03-10-2012 03:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Roald (Post 18814590)
I agree :2 cents:

https://www.google.com/webhp?hl=en#h...1280&b ih=766

The level of abuse here is slipping so much.

Here's the truth.

If sponsor or "whale" had waved enough money in front of any offline shooter he would of changed camps or had a foot in each one. We're all about money. If any online shooter could of earned $3,000 a set non exclusive consistently on his work he would of changed camps or had a foot in each one.

Could Roald of ever waved enough money in front of a good shooter to make him change camps or or have a foot in each one?

Could he with all his skills driving traffic, partnered with a good shooter and made enough money to keep the shooter happy?

If he could of, why didn't he?

Interesting questions. He will no doubt come up with lots of excuses. Couldn't be bothered, was earning too much doing what he was doing, didn't have the skills. All excuses that in business, well a proper business, would get laughed at.

I can't program, so employed a programer in the end we had 3. No one ever thinks WTF did we need 3 programmers for, go figure it out.

I could edit reel to reel and have learned to use a program. Didn't have time before, so I employed an editor.

Didn't want to sit on a computer correcting and sorting images, so employed someone to do it.

Didn't want to jump up and shoot every time a model walked through the doors or go to Prague on castings or do make up, or get the studio ready, or do a number of other jobs. I employed people to do it.

If I wanted to develop into another area to make more money. I didn't make excuses, I employed people.

All it takes to grow a business, is the talent to run one, the business skills and money.

Roald 03-10-2012 04:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 18814637)
https://www.google.com/webhp?hl=en#h...1280&b ih=766

The level of abuse here is slipping so much.

Here's the truth.

If sponsor or "whale" had waved enough money in front of any offline shooter he would of changed camps or had a foot in each one. We're all about money. If any online shooter could of earned $3,000 a set non exclusive consistently on his work he would of changed camps or had a foot in each one.

Could Roald of ever waved enough money in front of a good shooter to make him change camps or or have a foot in each one?

Could he with all his skills driving traffic, partnered with a good shooter and made enough money to keep the shooter happy?

If he could of, why didn't he?

Interesting questions. He will no doubt come up with lots of excuses. Couldn't be bothered, was earning too much doing what he was doing, didn't have the skills. All excuses that in business, well a proper business, would get laughed at.

I can't program, so employed a programer in the end we had 3. No one ever thinks WTF did we need 3 programmers for, go figure it out.

I could edit reel to reel and have learned to use a program. Didn't have time before, so I employed an editor.

Didn't want to sit on a computer correcting and sorting images, so employed someone to do it.

Didn't want to jump up and shoot every time a model walked through the doors or go to Prague on castings or do make up, or get the studio ready, or do a number of other jobs. I employed people to do it.

If I wanted to develop into another area to make more money. I didn't make excuses, I employed people.

All it takes to grow a business, is the talent to run one, the business skills and money.

You?ve got to be kidding me. I?ve been further even more decided to use even go need to do look more as anyone can. Can you really be far even as decided half as much to use go wish for that? My guess is that when one really been far even as decided once to use even go want, it is then that he has really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like. It?s just common sense :2 cents:

DamianJ 03-10-2012 04:37 AM

Poor Paul. His wife works every day and his kid is at school so he only has the weekend to see them, and for the third weekend running he is choosing to make long posts on GFY rather than spend quality time with them :(

MaDalton 03-10-2012 04:40 AM

sigh....

asdasd 03-10-2012 05:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Roald (Post 18814666)
You’ve got to be kidding me. I’ve been further even more decided to use even go need to do look more as anyone can. Can you really be far even as decided half as much to use go wish for that? My guess is that when one really been far even as decided once to use even go want, it is then that he has really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like. It’s just common sense :2 cents:

http://www.geekosystem.com/wp-conten...Man_Denied.gif

Paul Markham 03-10-2012 05:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Roald (Post 18814666)
You’ve got to be kidding me. I’ve been further even more decided to use even go need to do look more as anyone can. Can you really be far even as decided half as much to use go wish for that? My guess is that when one really been far even as decided once to use even go want, it is then that he has really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like. It’s just common sense :2 cents:

So I assume you couldn't go the extra mile to expand into paysites.

The saddest part of this thread is the lack of any decent replies. Which sponsors did diversificate, adapt into different markets, go to the other sides of porn, when they were still worth going to?

Roald knows that some sites by far out perform others. Would he of liked to own one, would he of liked more of them to send traffic to?

The obvious answer is yes, I point out the failings of online porn and his only answer is abuse or making fun of the post. The lack of a credible reply is sad.

Yes Madalton you may well sigh. You came in to late too see the glory days. Then again, you did stand in the wharehouse of Beate Uhste. Sigh!!!

georgeyw 03-10-2012 05:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fletch XXX (Post 18813210)
think of this Paul, in 1977 did you think I would be here in 2012 making apps with your content?

For that matter, in 1977, I was less than 1 year of age, and had no idea 35 years later id be making apps with your content.

technology rules.

You are writing apps and I am dunking my balls in Charlize Theron's ass.

MaDalton 03-10-2012 05:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 18814713)
So I assume you couldn't go the extra mile to expand into paysites.

so you couldnt go the extra mile and not just sell office furniture but also build it? :winkwink:

Roald 03-10-2012 05:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 18814713)
So I assume you couldn't go the extra mile to expand into paysites.

Oh there was a question in your wall of text?

You are correct :thumbsup

MaDalton 03-10-2012 05:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 18814713)
Yes Madalton you may well sigh. You came in to late too see the glory days. Then again, you did stand in the wharehouse of Beate Uhste. Sigh!!!

Her name was Uhse and it was Orion i was visiting :)

And my days are quite glorious right now, thank you :thumbsup

Paul Markham 03-10-2012 07:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaDalton (Post 18814717)
so you couldnt go the extra mile and not just sell office furniture but also build it? :winkwink:

As I was just a worker in the business no I couldn't. Could Herman Miller go the extra mile and sell as well as produce?

Try harder please. :1orglaugh

Quote:

Her name was Uhse and it was Orion i was visiting

And my days are quite glorious right now, thank you
Orion were mainly mail order and sold mostly toys. Laws in Germany about Mail Order Porn might of been the problem. Tell us about the laws.

I'm off to have a snack and sleep. Eva and our daughter are skiing and I finished another chapter of my life in porn.

MaDalton 03-10-2012 07:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 18814777)
As I was just a worker in the business no I couldn't. Could Herman Miller go the extra mile and sell as well as produce?

Try harder please. :1orglaugh



Orion were mainly mail order and sold mostly toys. Laws in Germany about Mail Order Porn might of been the problem. Tell us about the laws.

I'm off to have a snack and sleep. Eva and our daughter are skiing and I finished another chapter of my life in porn.


The branches of ORION Versand GmbH & Co. KG
7 mail order companies in Europe:
Germany, Austria, Switzerland, Denmark, Sweden, Norway and Spain
More than 170 retail shops in Europe:
Germany, Austria, Denmark, Norway and Spain
ORION wholesale worldwide:
Delivery to big dispatchers, distributors and erotic shops

xholly 03-10-2012 07:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jakez (Post 18814504)
:1orglaugh He really fell for this one. Love you Paul.

Nothing against Paul, just making fun. Paul is great value :thumbsup

asdasd 03-10-2012 08:02 AM

http://images.memegenerator.net/inst...0x/9933435.jpg

Paul Markham 03-10-2012 11:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Roald (Post 18814718)
Oh there was a question in your wall of text?

You are correct :thumbsup

It's too late now. Still you were just one of many who never looked outside what you were doing to expand, diversify and adapt.

Was it because you were unable to?

My annoyance with this industry is the way it accuses others for not doing what it didn't do.

And for assuming driving traffic is the be all and end all of this business. When it's clearly not on their own experience.

How many time have we seen these type of statements?

Any problem with not enough joins is put down to not enough traffic.

An affiliate saying he can convert anything given enough traffic.

He can sell anything with the right marketing.

That getting content is easy.

That getting traffic is hard.

All true if taken literally, but not sensible. Except the last one. Getting 10 surfers is easy. Getting a sale from them is the hard part.

I guess after taking abuse from dwarfs for so long, now they are seeing their results of the way the industry has been run, it's time for me to point it out.

B.Barnato 03-11-2012 12:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Roald (Post 18814590)
I agree :2 cents:

:1orglaugh

Jakez 03-11-2012 12:20 AM

Paul, no one doubts you have made some decent money over the years and worked hard for it and adapted when needed. But your constant babbling of repeated opinion or views and thread derailing doing so is what annoys everyone and that is why you receive so much negativity. But I'm sure you already know that.

papill0n 03-11-2012 12:30 AM

roald wrote this crap

Quote:

Originally Posted by Roald (Post 18814666)
You?ve got to be kidding me. I?ve been further even more decided to use even go need to do look more as anyone can. Can you really be far even as decided half as much to use go wish for that? My guess is that when one really been far even as decided once to use even go want, it is then that he has really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like. It?s just common sense :2 cents:

and paul responds to it ! with this!



Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 18814713)
So I assume you couldn't go the extra mile to expand into paysites.

The saddest part of this thread is the lack of any decent replies. Which sponsors did diversificate, adapt into different markets, go to the other sides of porn, when they were still worth going to?

Roald knows that some sites by far out perform others. Would he of liked to own one, would he of liked more of them to send traffic to?

The obvious answer is yes, I point out the failings of online porn and his only answer is abuse or making fun of the post. The lack of a credible reply is sad.

Yes Madalton you may well sigh. You came in to late too see the glory days. Then again, you did stand in the wharehouse of Beate Uhste. Sigh!!!


:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:

B.Barnato 03-11-2012 12:39 AM

If anyone had any remaining doubts about looney tunes this should seal it.

Jakez 03-11-2012 12:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by papill0n (Post 18815911)
roald wrote this crap

and paul responds to it ! with this!

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:

LOL what the fuck?

Roald 03-11-2012 01:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 18815883)
....

Paul, it really doesn't matter what I say. You will never agree with anything I say even when you know I am right.

Carry on :2 cents:

Paul Markham 03-11-2012 01:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Roald (Post 18815987)
Paul, it really doesn't matter what I say. You will never agree with anything I say even when you know I am right.

Carry on :2 cents:

Has anyone said that not diversifying, not employing people to fill positions the boss can't do, not looking outside of one small avenue of business is "Being a good Businessman"?

Look at what people are saying. Usually just abuse. Madalton at least attempts to point to other porn businesses that didn't stay in one narrow avenue and did diversify into many areas. He's using his knowledge to put up a counter point.

Did porn shops rely on novelties over porn for their income? Anyone who's been in a porn shop prior to the demise of the porn industry will know the answer to that.

nextri 03-11-2012 02:14 AM

I like cheese

Paul Markham 03-11-2012 02:25 AM

The problem is two views of the same situation.

Some see sponsors paying affiliates a lot and giving them all the help needed. As a good thing.

I see it as, saturating online porn with poor affiliates. Taking traffic from good ones.

Some see giving away lots of free porn, as getting lots of traffic.

I see it, as losing lots of sales.

Some see staying in a single sector as good.

I see it as missing an opportunity to make more money.

Some see making a smart ass reply as cool.

I see it as a lack of a credible reply.

Jakez 03-11-2012 02:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 18816036)
The problem is two views of the same situation.

Some see sponsors paying affiliates a lot and giving them all the help needed. As a good thing.

I see it as, saturating online porn with poor affiliates. Taking traffic from good ones.

Some see giving away lots of free porn, as getting lots of traffic.

I see it, as losing lots of sales.

Some see staying in a single sector as good.

I see it as missing an opportunity to make more money.

Some see making a smart ass reply as cool.

I see it as a lack of a credible reply.

Here's a credible reply. People are selling their traffic to others because they make more than trying to convert it. That means they are sending it to the wrong place so they offer it to others who pay for it and send it to where it needs to go. I really don't know why you have a personal hatred for traffic sellers and buyers when they are simply trying to keep porn sales alive. Period.

Paul Markham 03-11-2012 02:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jakez (Post 18816042)
Here's a credible reply. People are selling their traffic to others because they make more than trying to convert it. That means they are sending it to the wrong place so they offer it to others who pay for it and send it to where it needs to go. I really don't know why you have a personal hatred for traffic sellers and buyers when they are simply trying to keep porn sales alive. Period.

Good answer and thank you.

I would agree in some cases. Excluding those selling traffic, after trying to convert it themselves.

For some selling ad space is their best way of earning a living. Ultimately many sell traffic, some on bulk per 1,000s some on rev share sending t to others. Because they can't convert it themselves and earn more.

I have no hatred for traffic sellers and buyers. Only sadness that keeping the porn business alive has come to this.

Hatred is far too strong a word.

alextokyo 03-11-2012 03:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by theking (Post 18812725)
You poor...pathetic babbling fool.

Sorry I didn't catch this one earlier. I was too busy, uh... out of the, uh, house... donating to "military families". Yeah, that'll do it. :1orglaugh

Anyway... pot, meet kettle.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:26 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc