GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Tips and ideas for the hiring and staffing of an adult company (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1062597)

mpahlca 03-28-2012 10:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by raymor (Post 18848640)
Another quick thought - if you're hiring skills you don't have, engage someone who does have those skills to consult in the hiring process. Especially technical skills. If you can't code, you don't have the knowledge to judge an applicant's choice of algorithms. I can interview a programmer, but I'm not qualified to choose a marketing manager. I don't know that field well enough to make the best selection so I'd consult with someone who DOES know marketing to help choose the new hire.

This is a great point I didn't bring up. Well said Ray. (and hi Ray long time no chat!)

mpahlca 03-28-2012 10:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NemesisEnforcer (Post 18849150)
Do you recommend drug testing as well?

I would say a background check is a must though if you are legally allowed to do it. Drug test I honestly debate back and forth with myself on it could be voluntary but I would consider that option depending on the size of my company. The smaller more exposed I was the more I would lean on that idea.

TMM_John 03-28-2012 10:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mpahlca (Post 18849691)
If I was in the states I would only hire on contract work. I would consult with a lawyer but essentially I would hire each person as a contractor for x period of time. Let them handle their own taxes.

That's called payroll tax fraud and is illegal. Definitely consult with a CPA and/or attorney before going that route.

mpahlca 03-28-2012 10:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TMM_John (Post 18849744)
It's doable, but the vast majority of the time you'll get much lower production out of the remote employee. I know people will argue the contrary. They're more than welcome to burn all the money they wish :)

As far staff costs as a % of revenue; I don't believe you should ever try to mimic other companies or industry averages. Each company is going to have unique circumstances. Some may do quite well at half the industry average, some may need double. You need to look at many other things and figure out what is right for you, not try to mimic large companies.

TMM is also not SaaS. Our mainstream end of things is tho.

TMM is not Software as a Service? I thought you leased it and then charged for support? It may have changed so sorry if so.

As far as doing what others do I agree you should find your own way but not knowing what others are doing is a mistake IMO as you then don't know what others have done successfully.

Knowing and understanding others successful patterns doesn't mean you have to replicate them, it means you can see what others are doing and then improve on it. As I believe was the point of NATS in the first place. MPA was a product you did better than they did.

But again everyone is different (I am just super happy there has been some real discussion here on it.)

mpahlca 03-28-2012 11:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TMM_John (Post 18849754)
That's called payroll tax fraud and is illegal. Definitely consult with a CPA and/or attorney before going that route.

As John said look into the legalities of it in your area. Its not illegal to do it in Canada as long as the individuals have their own companies and they are hired as sub contracts for a specific job with an end date.

Tom_PM 03-28-2012 11:10 AM

I think telecommuting/working remote is something that should always be worked into a game plan. Provided there are tasks that can be done from a remote terminal obviously, and the ability to take written reports.

Relocating for each job could become a job in itself without some long term contracts.

NemesisEnforcer 03-28-2012 12:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mpahlca (Post 18849750)
I would say a background check is a must though if you are legally allowed to do it. Drug test I honestly debate back and forth with myself on it could be voluntary but I would consider that option depending on the size of my company. The smaller more exposed I was the more I would lean on that idea.

I've debated drug testing as a regular course of business. However, I do request a drug test if we're hiring some that will be trusted with a great deal of company assets, i.e. large sums of money to do production or to manage a remote location, etc.

CaptainHowdy 03-28-2012 12:03 PM

I look down on management ...

plsureking 03-28-2012 12:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by papill0n (Post 18848590)
and dont forget to punch every potential employee into google :)

and the boards if hiring from within the industry.
being associated with some guys around here would cripple your project or brand..
#

alias 03-28-2012 01:10 PM

Nice work on the creation of a real business thread.

raymor 03-28-2012 01:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mpahlca (Post 18849775)
As John said look into the legalities of it in your area. Its not illegal to do it in Canada as long as the individuals have their own companies and they are hired as sub contracts for a specific job with an end date.

Here's the skinny -
Some people try to commit fraud by lying and saying that employees are outside contractors. That's obviously illegal pretty much anywhere. It's perfectly legal to use actual independent contractors. It's just that if you want to treat them like independent contractors for tax purposes, you have to treat them as independent contractors on a day to day basis.

In general, with employees you pay for their time. With contractors, you pay for a result. Some differences between employes and independent contractors can include:

Employees are expected to arrive at a certain time and work a certain number of hours per day.
Contractors are expected to finish a project by a certain date, but work any hours they want.

Employees use tools provided by the employer, such as company computers.
Independent contractors use thrir own tools and equipment.

Employees personally do the work.
Contractors can hire assistants or sub-contract part of the work.

We have an employee here who was a contractor for us for a while. During his time as a contractor Ali started to say something about him being late and I had to stop her. Since we were treating him as a contractor, not an employee, we had no right comment on what time he came to work. He was his own boss. We were his customer, not his employer. Now, we want him here at a certain time each day, so he's now an employee.

plsureking 03-28-2012 09:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by raymor (Post 18850063)
It's perfectly legal to use actual independent contractors. It's just that if you want to treat them like independent contractors for tax purposes, you have to treat them as independent contractors on a day to day basis.

great post :thumbsup

#

Sunny Day 03-29-2012 09:01 AM

Independent Contractors
 
1st off contact a CPA, not a lawyer. Most lawyers know nothing of taxes. A lot depends on the nature of the business. Most topless bars only will hire independent contractors.

The Govt usually cares less as
1 Either way the employee/contractor will have to pay all their income taxes, although independent contractors can deduct some expenses, but an employee would be reimbursed and the employer would deduct the expenses.
2 Either way the Govt will still get the Social Security tax. Independent contractor pays all or a 50/50 split between employee & employer.
3 Actually Govt comes out ahead on Workers Comp & Unemployment on an independent contractor, as an employee will most likely get back more than they had withheld.

My GF works as an independent contractor for a business that has employees doing the same exact job. There is nothing illegal about it and despite what posters have said, she does not have to be incorporated, nor is it illegal to hire independent contractors.

A lot of the independent contractor rules are in the Fair Labor Standards Act. It's mostly to keep companies declaring their employees independent contractors, so they can pay straight time instead of overtime.

The basic rule is an independent contractor, can have the option to have multiple employers. A web site designer is a perfect example. If he works at home it's easy for him to be an independent contractor. If he works in your office 40 hours a week he is probably an employee. Less than 40 it's a gray area.

You can always hire through a temp agency, costs more, but many companies believe the long term costs, especially not paying employee benefits are less. Also with an agency, you call them, say the employee is no longer needed and there's no worry of a firing lawsuit.

As for drug testing, I've worked for small and huge companies in the sensitive area of accounting. Mostly as a contract employee (temp), never was I required to take a drug test where regular employees had to. Many places I had more access than the regular employees to sensitive items (money or data). I took the trust I was given seriously and never did harm to an employer. I quit one job after 2 weeks when they falsely questioned my honesty over my medical insurance. I walked out of a job interview as I had to take an honesty test by telephone, 1 for yes, 2 for no. The recorded voice sounded like a supervisor at some cotton mill on Alabama and the sneer in his voice was "if you have to work, you're scum."
Drug tests are worthless. meet the person, get a feel for them. Most of the time you can tell the honest from crooks. But I've worked at companies where a grandmother that didn't even drink ended up arrested for embezzling.

As for the interview, I've got jobs just walking in the door. I also filled at a job application for a small business that was 10 pages long. Got the feeling the owner was a paranoid control freak and was going to be a pain to work for. Glad he didn't call back.

Barefootsies 03-29-2012 09:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by raymor (Post 18850063)
Here's the skinny -
Some people try to commit fraud by lying and saying that employees are outside contractors. That's obviously illegal pretty much anywhere. It's perfectly legal to use actual independent contractors. It's just that if you want to treat them like independent contractors for tax purposes, you have to treat them as independent contractors on a day to day basis.

As stated previously, I think anyone who is serious about their business should have this conversation with their accountant/CPA and not trust GFY board lore. Ultimately, they are the ones' who sign off on your tax docs, and keep you in the good graces of IRS.

:2 cents:

CaptainHowdy 03-29-2012 10:04 AM


Barefootsies 04-21-2012 01:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pornopete (Post 18851778)
Maybe this question is better suited for Paul. Where are you Paul?

He's back from his recent banning, and can now chime in for ye.

:2 cents:

AmeliaG 04-21-2012 04:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by raymor (Post 18848676)
Ditto and ditto. I may try ADP. I wish I could find a clueful accountant. I've gotten rid of three because they didn't know basic stuff like section 179 and all had us doing something illegal because they didn't know any better. In each case, the errors were basic enough that I noticed them and confirmed on the main accountant message board how it should be done.



What is the main accountant message board?

This is a good thread. :thumbsup


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:27 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123