GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   boneprone family rich (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1065839)

LeRoy 04-24-2012 08:42 PM

Shits gettin real around here!

Just Alex 04-24-2012 08:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by garce (Post 18907213)
Can you grow up and get rid of the pathetic Marishka Hargitay (or whatever the fuck her name is) animated gif? No-one will ever take anything you say seriously as long as you're promoting that twelve-year old Mike Myers "Love Guru" shit. Wow! You be a clever asshole.

Get rid of the seizure-inducing avatar.

Idiot.

Dumb ass, do you have any fucking idea that she is known for something much bigger than stupid "love guru" flop?

Another clueless GFY.com idiot comes out of the closet.

SleazyDream 04-24-2012 09:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lazycash (Post 18906718)
Hey I was just curious since you were the one who brought up your lakefront land, I thought maybe you and Jman had salvaged your deal.

no -you're a moron. if you want dirt, start a new thread.

Supz 04-24-2012 09:05 PM

'they fucked him'

lazycash 04-24-2012 09:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 18907041)
Seriously? :error

I wasn't really, but wanted to see his reaction.

garce 04-24-2012 09:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Just Alex (Post 18907220)
Dumb ass, do you have any fucking idea that she is known for something much bigger than stupid "love guru" flop?

Another clueless GFY.com idiot comes out of the closet.

Yes, she is famous for yet another unwatchable Law & Order derivation. The sex one - the one that tries to be "cutting edge". SVU. Fucking laughable show. Serious, blatant exploitation. No redeeming social values. Network television pornography.

If it was an HBO show, it might have real scripts, real acting, and real meaning. The show just exploits sex for ratings. Its the sad joke show of the Law & Order family - although they all pretty well suck now.

Lose the avatar faggot. My favourite Law & Order SVU was the one with Jennifer Love Hewitt in it. Gimme a break - the show is shit.

I'm in Toronto. I get Law & Order SVU about 20 times a day on my TV. Its old, its over. My favourite Law & Order character is Bobby Gorn. Vincent D'Onofrio FTW! Zoiks!

Here's one for you:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jayne_Mansfield | http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mickey_Hargitay

The daughter ain't the momma. Not even close. She ain't even the daddy.

Get rid of the seizure inducing nodding head, asshat.

Fuck.

Just Alex 04-24-2012 09:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by garce (Post 18907273)
Yes, she is famous for yet another unwatchable Law & Order derivation. The sex one - the one that tries to be "cutting edge". SVU. Fucking laughable show. Serious, blatant exploitation. No redeeming social values. Network television pornography.

If it was an HBO show, it might have real scripts, real acting, and real meaning. The show just exploits sex for ratings. Its the sad joke show of the Law & Order family - although they all pretty well suck now.

Lose the avatar faggot. My favourite Law & Order SVU was the one with Jennifer Love Hewitt in it. Gimme a break - the show is shit.

I'm in Toronto. I get Law & Order SVU about 20 times a day on my TV. Its old, its over. My favourite Law & Order character is Bobby Gorn. Vincent D'Onofrio FTW! Zoiks!

Here's one for you:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jayne_Mansfield | http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mickey_Hargitay

The daughter ain't the momma. Not even close. She ain't even the daddy.

Get rid of the seizure inducing nodding head, asshat.

Fuck.


Eat a Hot Bowl of Dicks punk. Like I give a fuck what you think or what you watch. Nuke Canada and fuck off.

garce 04-24-2012 09:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LeRoy (Post 18907215)
Shits gettin real around here!

This board is now defined by hatred and animosity. Now that no-one has any friends left here, its fucking funny how eager people are to stab you in the back and put you down.

I include myself in those numbers. I always have, though... I'm holding down the fort, the rest of the board is just now coalescing around me.

Choas and mayhem. Keep bringing it on. I fucking love it! If you ever thought you had a friend here - HA! That is done.

GFY members will suck on your ass until they hear the tiniest bit of gossip about you - then they'll sell you out in the blink of an eye.

garce 04-24-2012 09:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Just Alex (Post 18907279)
Eat a Hot Bowl of Dicks punk. Like I give a fuck what you think or what you watch. Nuke Canada and fuck off.

Can you please exchange the seizure inducing avatar of Ms. Hargitay for a more appealing one? Here: https://www.google.com/search?q=mari...11 94&bih=871 A VERY attractive woman - but not when her head is constantly nodding from side to side.

I like Marishka Margiaty. Just not that picture...

Now, here is my problem...

I believe that - since Sept. 11. 2001 - a LOT of government agencies have popped up to protect free countries from insane assholes that spout shit like, oh, NUKE CANADA.

I now have to report this thread. I do believe its the law. If some dipshit asshole makes a random threat to the national security of my country - I HAVE to report it. I'm 100% serious. If someone says "Nuke Canada" I have to report that threat.

And I AM going to report your "Nuke Canada" threat. I have no idea how angry or insane you are. I have no idea what your motives are. I don't care. You have scared me, though, and I no longer feel safe. You want to Nuke Canada over a picture of Marishka Hargitay.

Really? Nuke Canada? This is an internet argument - its not a war.

You scare me.

Just Alex 04-24-2012 10:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by garce (Post 18907309)
Can you please exchange the seizure inducing avatar of Ms. Hargitay for a more appealing one? Here: https://www.google.com/search?q=mari...11 94&bih=871 A VERY attractive woman - but not when her head is constantly nodding from side to side.

I like Marishka Margiaty. Just not that picture...

Now, here is my problem...

I believe that - since Sept. 11. 2001 - a LOT of government agencies have popped up to protect free countries from insane assholes that spout shit like, oh, NUKE CANADA.

I now have to report this thread. I do believe its the law. If some dipshit asshole makes a random threat to the national security of my country - I HAVE to report it. I'm 100% serious. If someone says "Nuke Canada" I have to report that threat.

And I AM going to report your "Nuke Canada" threat. I have no idea how angry or insane you are. I have no idea what your motives are. I don't care. You have scared me, though, and I no longer feel safe. You want to Nuke Canada over a picture of Marishka Hargitay.

Really? Nuke Canada? This is an internet argument - its not a war.

You scare me.

http://i48.tinypic.com/15y0r5.jpg

epitome 04-24-2012 10:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by garce (Post 18907309)
Can you please exchange the seizure inducing avatar of Ms. Hargitay for a more appealing one? Here: https://www.google.com/search?q=mari...11 94&bih=871 A VERY attractive woman - but not when her head is constantly nodding from side to side.

I like Marishka Margiaty. Just not that picture...

Now, here is my problem...

I believe that - since Sept. 11. 2001 - a LOT of government agencies have popped up to protect free countries from insane assholes that spout shit like, oh, NUKE CANADA.

I now have to report this thread. I do believe its the law. If some dipshit asshole makes a random threat to the national security of my country - I HAVE to report it. I'm 100% serious. If someone says "Nuke Canada" I have to report that threat.

And I AM going to report your "Nuke Canada" threat. I have no idea how angry or insane you are. I have no idea what your motives are. I don't care. You have scared me, though, and I no longer feel safe. You want to Nuke Canada over a picture of Marishka Hargitay.

Really? Nuke Canada? This is an internet argument - its not a war.

You scare me.

I am just going to point out that he told you to do it and you mentioned doing it like 5 more times.

Also pretty sure that only governments have that ability right now and he is not a head of state.

garce 04-24-2012 11:12 PM

Ok. I'll assume that "Nuke Canada" is a GFY supported plan of action?

Instead of posting "Nuke Canada", can some of you macho GFY failures go out on a limb and try posting threads about, oh....

"Nuke New York" ?
"Nuke Los Angeles" ?
"Nuke Isreal" ?

We'll see how long your fucking freedom lasts.

But posting Nuke Canada is ok? Really? If you posted "Nuke (Any city in the United States)" you'd have Homeland Security up your asses so far your dead grandparents would scream in pain.

Nuke Canada? Wow. That's an OK thing to post here, right? A common sentiment?

I want this fucking Alex asshole banned permanently. I have reported the threat he made against Canadian (and therefore American security - you guys would have to bail us out...) to the RCMP. Its up to them to decide whether or not they need to follow up on the threat or not.

Nuke Canada? Fuck you all. Delete this Alex piece of shit.

garce 04-24-2012 11:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by epitome (Post 18907326)
I am just going to point out that he told you to do it and you mentioned doing it like 5 more times.

Also pretty sure that only governments have that ability right now and he is not a head of state.

Your first sentence is nonesense. Its not even close to being English. He told me to do it and I mentioned doing it... doing what? I guess I did it five times, but WTF did I do?

Call him an asshole? I have no idea what you are referring to.

Can I please read your "Nuke Isreal" post? No? Your "Nuke New York" post? Where are they? Because its obviously ok to post or support "Nuke Canada" comments. Whereas if you posted a "Nukeanyotherplaceonthefaceofthefuckingearth" reply you'd already be in jail.

There is only one point here: He said Nuke Canada. And that's ok with you? That's fine? That's cool?

A common sentiment here at GFY is Nuke Canada?

I am really, truly, done. Nuke Canada, indeed.

Fuck the lot of you. Every single one of you.

Bye.

Just Alex 04-24-2012 11:22 PM

http://i.pbase.com/g3/87/648987/2/12...0.veQROroW.jpg

raymor 04-24-2012 11:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Harmon (Post 18906339)
I think there is a lesson to be learned here kids. Keep you mouth shut, and keep as low profile as possible.

Or don't fucking steal, which seems like a simple enough concept.

Just Alex 04-24-2012 11:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by garce (Post 18907385)
Your first sentence is nonesense. Its not even close to being English. He told me to do it and I mentioned doing it... doing what? I guess I did it five times, but WTF did I do?

Call him an asshole? I have no idea what you are referring to.

Can I please read your "Nuke Isreal" post? No? Your "Nuke New York" post? Where are they? Because its obviously ok to post or support "Nuke Canada" comments. Whereas if you posted a "Nukeanyotherplaceonthefaceofthefuckingearth" reply you'd already be in jail.

There is only one point here: He said Nuke Canada. And that's ok with you? That's fine? That's cool?

A common sentiment here at GFY is Nuke Canada?

I am really, truly, done. Nuke Canada, indeed.

Fuck the lot of you. Every single one of you.

Bye.

Bye,
















see you tomorrow clown.

raymor 04-24-2012 11:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DamageX (Post 18906401)
Embedding = publishing.

Regardless of where the content is located, he's publishing it. The difference between this and what The Pirate Bay are doing is that the latter only publish links to content, which people share from their home computers. Embedding is publishing the actual content for public view.

Would love to hear someone with a law degree opine on this. I know we have a few lawyers frequenting GFY, would love to hear from them.

Yeah people forget that judges aren't stupid (must of the time). They know a thief when they see one. "The video itself isn't on my server" is the same as "I leave the stolen cars on the street in front of my house, not on my property. Only the keys are in my house, in my pocket. So I'm not a car thief."

I don't know anything about Boneprone's sites, but obviously if someone is ripping content that makes them a thief. "I didn't host it on my server" means squat.

(Obviously one could rip CCL licensed content, but that doesn't apply.)

Roald 04-25-2012 12:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by boneprone (Post 18906294)
I have a 1999 lincoln Navigator I can give them.. Kelly blue book, about 5k..
The rims are nice though. A little bent.. So im thinking 5.5k?


Anyone want to lend me 19 million? LOL.

For embeding content from other sites.. Never hosted a movie once in my life ever on my sites.. All embeds..

Complete shake down. Bring it. Im ready.
Dumb fucks.

Bro, you are publishing it ;)

Best of luck though!!

topnotch, standup guy 04-25-2012 02:26 AM

boneprone has always struck me as a pretty cool guy. Certainly an amusing poster.

Wish it could have been one of those in-your-face "adapt or die" types that got nailed.

In a perfect world, boneprone will somehow slip off the hook and the sledgehammer will later crush the first of many truly deserving individuals :2 cents:


.

Qbert 04-25-2012 05:04 AM

The Bro Force is strong in this thread. :error

Three words for Boneprone to ask his lawyer about...

Contributory Copyright Infringement

CaptainHowdy 04-25-2012 06:07 AM

Cliffnotes:


fris 04-25-2012 06:38 AM

wasnt this suppose to be a thread about a lawsuit ;)

Rebel D 04-25-2012 06:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by epitome (Post 18906631)
I was using sarcasm.

you forgot the sarcasm font. probally why he missed it

DamageX 04-25-2012 06:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fris (Post 18907736)
wasnt this suppose to be a thread about a lawsuit ;)

It is, to some extent. But you can't stop the keyboard warriors from measuring their e-dicks in public.

Just Alex 04-25-2012 06:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jesus H Christ (Post 18907716)
Best advice in this thread. Now is the time to go full damage control. I often wondered why BP was still promoting his I am a baller, look at me, pimp mentality? It was great in 2007, but now it's totally foolish as it's proved. They're going to make an example out of him.

Are you saying he wasn't for real? The BPL signs, restaurant receipts and penthouse pets on his lap?

JFK 04-25-2012 06:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fris (Post 18907736)
wasnt this suppose to be a thread about a lawsuit ;)

and what does that have to do with anything ?:winkwink:

mamaliga 04-25-2012 07:02 AM

good luck boneprone

NaughtyVisions 04-25-2012 07:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by garce (Post 18907373)
Ok. I'll assume that "Nuke Canada" is a GFY supported plan of action?

Nuke Canada? Wow. That's an OK thing to post here, right? A common sentiment?


DamageX 04-25-2012 07:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Just Alex (Post 18907746)
Are you saying he wasn't for real? The BPL signs, restaurant receipts and penthouse pets on his lap?

You forgot the private jets. Seriously, the guy has been painting a HUGE target on himself.

L-Pink 04-25-2012 07:33 AM

And again, it all comes down to using someone else's property without permission.

.

react 04-25-2012 08:23 AM

This is no different than what Google/Yahoo/Blinkx do/did and is defensible. The case is nothing more than copyright trolling.

Why 04-25-2012 09:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by react (Post 18907915)
This is no different than what Google/Yahoo/Blinkx do/did and is defensible. The case is nothing more than copyright trolling.

QFT.

i have no dog in this fight and hope it comes to an amicable end for both parties.

that being said, even if he is crawling other sites to get the content and streaming it off their server, thus "publishing" it in some manor... how is that any different then what google of msn video search features do?

DamageX 04-25-2012 09:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Why (Post 18908174)
QFT.

i have no dog in this fight and hope it comes to an amicable end for both parties.

that being said, even if he is crawling other sites to get the content and streaming it off their server, thus "publishing" it in some manor... how is that any different then what google of msn video search features do?

Has Google or Bing embedded (published) Private's copyrighted content? If not, then this is irrelevant. They're going after boneprone because HE published THEIR content. What other sites do with other people's content is outside the scope of this particular lawsuit.

Roald 04-25-2012 09:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Why (Post 18908174)
QFT.

i have no dog in this fight and hope it comes to an amicable end for both parties.

that being said, even if he is crawling other sites to get the content and streaming it off their server, thus "publishing" it in some manor... how is that any different then what google of msn video search features do?

BP is much cheaper to fight with ;)

Klen 04-25-2012 09:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DamageX (Post 18908187)
Has Google or Bing embedded (published) Private's copyrighted content? If not, then this is irrelevant. They're going after boneprone because HE published THEIR content. What other sites do with other people's content is outside the scope of this particular lawsuit.

Party breaker :1orglaugh

DamageX 04-25-2012 09:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Roald (Post 18908190)
BP is much cheaper to fight with ;)

+ that. :)

CaptainHowdy 04-25-2012 10:15 AM

Don't kick them until they're really down ...

Rebel D 04-25-2012 10:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DamageX (Post 18908187)
Has Google or Bing embedded (published) Private's copyrighted content? If not, then this is irrelevant. They're going after boneprone because HE published THEIR content. What other sites do with other people's content is outside the scope of this particular lawsuit.


The voice of Reason

Why 04-25-2012 10:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DamageX (Post 18908187)
Has Google or Bing embedded (published) Private's copyrighted content? If not, then this is irrelevant. They're going after boneprone because HE published THEIR content. What other sites do with other people's content is outside the scope of this particular lawsuit.

i thought you knew how to use google?

https://www.google.com/search?q=miss...ient=firefox-a

looks like i can watch the latest update on private.com/movies/ right there on google.com, took 5 seconds of time to find.

what other people do with other peoples content is in fact a matter of this lawsuit, being foreign i know you don't understand american law. we have precedent, and im pretty sure this exact topic has already been argued in US courts.

then again, i havent read the entire complaint, so its possible DMCA notices were ignored, in which case. he is fucked. Oregon is an interesting venue as well, i wonder how tech savvy their courts are.

12clicks 04-25-2012 10:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Why (Post 18908261)
i thought you knew how to use google?

https://www.google.com/search?q=miss...ient=firefox-a

looks like i can watch the latest update on private.com/movies/ right there on google.com, took 5 seconds of time to find.

what other people do with other peoples content is in fact a matter of this lawsuit, being foreign i know you don't understand american law. we have precedent, and im pretty sure this exact topic has already been argued in US courts.

then again, i havent read the entire complaint, so its possible DMCA notices were ignored, in which case. he is fucked. Oregon is an interesting venue as well, i wonder how tech savvy their courts are.

"your honor, I'm not guilty because google is doing it too"

lets see how far that defense gets you. :1orglaugh


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:14 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc